Morphosyntax Analysis of Acehnese Clitic

Denni Iskandar, - Mulyadi, Iskandar Abdul Samad

Abstract


Clitic has challenged many grammatical theories because it is a combination between syntax and morphology. At most theory, clitization is considered as a phenomenon of phrase because the clan of its form is similar to affixes attached to whole phrase. Some experts claim that clitic is one form that is difficult to identify and classify. This qualitative research investigates the clitic of Acehnese in the perspective of morphosyntax. This research found that Acehnese consists of proclitic and enclitic. The function is to emphasize the topic being talked by the subject. In general, Acehnese clitic is a relatively complex personal pronoun because Acehnese’s pronominal system is identical with the content of morality (politeness and friendship). Each personal pronoun has its own proclitic and enclitic including the adjustment of clitic for variant personal pronouns which refers to the level of politeness. In addition to personal pronoun, the clitic in Acehnese is also used to refer to noun or nounphrase either to animals, plants, or other types of nouns.

Keywords


Clitic, Proclitic, Enclitic, Acehnese, Personal Pronoun, Politeness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asyik, A.G. (1987). A contextual grammar of acehnese sentences. Disertasi. Michigan: The University of Michigan.

Bauer, L. (1988). Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Chatzikyriakidis, S. (2010). Clitics in four dialects of modern greek: a dynamic account. Disertasi.University of London: Department of PhilosophyKing’s College London.

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design; Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). The USA: Sage.

Djajasudarma, T. F. (2006). Metode linguistik: ancangan metode penelitian dan kajian. Bandung: Eresco.

Djunaidi, A. (1992). Morfosintaksis bahasa Aceh: analisis tipologi sintaksis. Tesis. Bandung: Unpad.

Djunaidi, A. (1996). Relasi-relasi gramatikal dalam bahasa aceh: satu telaah berdasarkan teori tata bahasa relasional. Disertasi. Bandung: Unpad.

Durie, M. (1985). A grammar of Achenese on the dialect of North Aceh. Dordrecht-Holland/Cimnnamison USA: Foris Publication.

Grüter, T. (2006). Object clitics and null objects in the acquisition of french. Disertasi. Montreal: Department of Linguistics, McGill University.

Halpern, A.L. (1998). Clitics. In Spencer, A. and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Harris, A.C. (2002). Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hudson, R. (2007). Clitics in Word Grammar. Retrieved from http://www. phon.ucl.ac.uk/ home/dick/wg.htm. on 5 January 2018.

Iqbal, M. (2011). Diatesis aktif bahasa aceh: analisis morfosintaksis. Tesis. Bandung: Unpad.

Kari, E.E. (2003). Clitics in Degema: A Meeting Point of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.

Katamba, F. (1994). Modern Linguistics: Morphology. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Kaufman, D.A. (2010). The morphosyntax of tagalog clitics: a typologically driven approach. Disertasi. New York: Faculty of the Graduate Schoolof Cornell University.

Kopris, C.A. and Anthony R. D. (1988). Theoretical Morphology Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.

Martín, F.J. (2012). Deconstructing catalan object clitics. Disertasi.New York: Department of Linguistics.

Medová, L. (2009). Reflexive clitics in the slavic and romance languages: a comparative view from an antipassive perspective. Disertasi. Faculty of Princeton University, Department of Slavic Languages And Literatures.

Muhadjir, N. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi ketiga. Yogyakarta: Rakesarasin.

Salmons, I.O. (2015). The agrammatic comprehension of contrastive focus and clitic left dislocation in catalan. Disertasi. Universitat Autonoma de Bercelona: Fakultat de Filosofia I Lietres.

Schiering, R. (2006). Cliticizationand the volution of morphology: a cross-linguistic study on phonology in grammaticalization. Disertasi. Universitas Konstanz Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft.

Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A.M. (2001). The Handbook of Morphology (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.

Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Verhaar, J. W. M. (1996). Asas-AsasLinguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Wildan, W. (2010). Kaidah Bahasa Aceh. Banda Aceh: Geuci.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.212

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.