Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Bumper Stickers in Jordan: A Structural Analysis
Abstract
This study has set out to determine the structural patterns of bumper stickers in Jordan. This study is significant since it is the first one to approach bumper stickers structurally. The study has investigated 227 stickers, which can be considered the corpus of stickers in Jordan. The study has found that around 90% of the stickers are sentences, most of which are simple sentences expressed in the present tense. This combination of the three elements i.e. sentence, declarative and simple is what facilitated the job of drivers to write their opinions, attitudes, beliefs, etc. and is what made it possible for the others i.e. drivers and pedestrians to understand the stickers. The study has also found that imperative and negative imperatives are quite common since the stickers are not addressed to the writer/driver rather to the others so as to inform them about his state, his miserable condition, his opinions, his loyalties, and his vehicle. The stickers are addressed to others to demand certain behaviors from them such as driving wisely, not challenging the sticker writer, respecting him if he is driving a truck or a lorry, etc.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Almeda, Cheryl and Jonathan Bush (2012). The Grammar of Context: Breakfast, Bumper Stickers, and Beyond. Language Arts Journal of Michigan. Vol. 27, Issue 2, PP
Belk, Russell W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing. Vol. 7, Issue 2, PP 184-207.
Block, Linda-Renee, (2000). Mobile Discourse: Political Bumper Stickers as a Communication Event in Isreal. Journal of Communication. Vol. 50, No. 2, pp 48-76.
Burt, Richard and Demitri K. Simes, (2015). Foreign Policy by Bumper Stickers. The National Interest. September/October Issue. New York.
Chiluwa, Innocent, (2008). Religious Vehicle Stickers in Nigeria: A Discourse of Identity, Faith and Social Vision. Discourse and Communication. Vol. 2, No. 4. PP 371-87.
Dahl, Östen, (1975). On Generics. In E.L.Keenan (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language. PP 99-111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_________ (1995). The Marking of Episodic/ Generic Distinction in Tense-Aspect Systems. In Carlson, Greg, N. & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Das, D. A. (1991). Dialogic and Argumentative Structures of Bumper Stickers. In Mak Karawan and Andrew U. Frank (eds.) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space. Kluwer Academic Publishing.
Haynsworth, Leslie, (2008). My Volvo, My Self: The (Largely Unintended) Existential Implications of Bumper Stickers. Fourth Genre. Vol. 10, No.1. pp 21-34.
Jaradat, A (2015). Content-Based Analysis of Bumper Stickers in Jordan. Sociolinguistic Studies: under-review.
Nordlinger, Jay, (2015). Stick It to ’em: A World of Bumper Stickers. National Review. Vol. LXVII, No. 15, pp 26-27. New York.
Norton-Meier, Lori A, (2004). The Bumper Sticker Curriculum: Learning from Words on the Backs of Cars. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy. Vol. 48, No.3. PP 260-63.
Stern, B. B, and Soloman, M. R. (1992). “Have You Kissed Your Professor Today?”: Bumper Stickers and Consumer Self Statements. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, PP 169-173.
Szlemko, W., Jacob A. Benfield, Paul A. Bell, Jerry L. Deffenbacher and Lucy Troup, (2008). Territorial Markings as a Predicator of Driver Aggression and Road Rage. Journal of Applied Social psychology, Vol. 38, No. 6, PP 1664-88.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.4p.91
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.