Email this article 
Hide
Show all
The Use of Learner Autonomy in English as a Foreign Language Context among Saudi Undergraduates Enrolled in Preparatory Year Deanship at Najran University
Abstract
This paper explores the current practices of learner autonomy among Saudi undergraduates at Preparatory Year, Najran University. The Short List questionnaire developed by Dixon (2011) was administered to measure the use of autonomous learning in English as a foreign language (EFL) context. Quantitative data were gathered from 208 male students in level one. The results of the data analysis showed that the participants experience a low level of learner autonomy (LA) in English language. While the LA dimensions of linguistic confidence, social comparison, and locus of control are considered a weakness for the participants, they had medium averages in information literacy, metacognition, and self-reliance dimensions. Therefore, the study suggests the need for pedagogical treatments like the strategy use instruction to develop LA in the Saudi EFL context.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Saadi, H. M. (2011). From Spoon Feeding to Self-Feeding: Helping Learners Take Control of Their Own Learning. Arab World English Journal, 2(3), 95-114.
Al Asmari, A. (2013). Practices and prospects of learner autonomy: Teachers' perceptions. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 1.
Allwright, D. (1990). Autonomy in language pedagogy. CRILE Working Paper, 6.
Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. Autonomy and independence in language learning, 7, 18-34.
Benson, P. (2010). Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to the test. Testing the untestable in language education, 77-97.
Benson, P., & Voller, P. A. (1997). Independence in Language Learning: London: Longman.
Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students' attitudes and behaviours. Evaluation & Research in Education, 16(1), 1-18.
Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195-205.
Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation a literature review. System, 23(2), 165-174.
Dixon, D. (2011). Measuring language learner autonomy in tertiary-level learners of English. University of Warwick.
Dornyeï, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation, England: Pearson Education Limited. P111-25.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies: Oxford University Press.
Dőrnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Constructing, administering, and processing: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Farooq, M. U. (2013). Effects of learner autonomy on teaching practices and outcomes in an ELT classroom. Eur. J. Sci. Res, 94, 316-330.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning, 43(2), 157-194.
Grow, G. O. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult education quarterly, 41(3), 125-149.
Harkness, J. A., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (1998). Questionnaires in translation: DEU.
Holec, H. (1981). Foreign Language Learning: Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Little, D. (1991). Autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Littlewood, W. (1996). “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24(4), 427-435.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
Murase, F. (2007). Operationalising the Construct of Learner Autonomy: A Preliminary Study for Developing a New Measure of Language Learner Autonomy. Paper presented at the proceedings of Independent Learning Association 2007 Japan Conference: Exploring Theory, Enhancing Practice, held in Kanda University of International Studies, Chiba, Japan.
Najeeb, S. S. (2013). Learner autonomy in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1238-1242.
Nunan, D. (2000). Autonomy in language learning. Paper presented at the at the ASOCOPI 2000 conference, Cartengena, Columbia
O'malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition: Cambridge university press.
Oxford, R. (1990b). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know? Boston: Heinleand Heinle. Pruitt, D. (2005). Transactional distance and learner autonomy as predictors of student performance in distance learning courses delivered by three modalities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tulane University, USA.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Sinclair, B. (1999). More than an act of faith? Evaluating learner autonomy. Innovation and best practice in British ELT. London: Longman (in association with the British Council).
Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11), 37-48.
Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2009). Autonomy in language learning: Do student take responsibility for their learning. Journal of Theory and practice in Education, 5(2), 148-169.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes: Harvard University press.
Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning1. Applied linguistics, 19(4), 515-537.
Zarei, A., & Gahremani, K. (2010). On the relationship between learner autonomy and reading comprehension: TELL.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.152
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.