The Perception of EFL High School Students in Using of Computer Technology in the Process of Learning: Merits and Demerits

Siros Izadpanah, Mansooreh Alavi

Abstract


Recent developments in the field of computer technology have led to a renewed interest in the process of learning.  In order to investigate EFL learners’ perception of technology use, a mixed method design was used to explore students’ attitude. Quantitative data was collected through questionnaires and qualitative data using open-ended questions.The questionnaire was distributed in two different high schools (one male and one female) in Zanjan, 2015. Participants were 340 high school students who filled in CALLAI questionnaire. The data of the questionnaire was analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 20. Descriptive statistics including frequencies and percentages were used to analyze questionnaire items. Data gathered from open-ended questions was analysed using qualitative data analysis software NVivo 8.0. It was found that students had positive attitude toward facilitation of English learning in the classroom through computer technology. Our objective was to explore students’ perceptions of technology usage in high schools .The implication of this study was that students, with prior experience in technology, might benefit more from technology use in education. Furthermore, it could be guidance for teachers to better understand world of technology and recognize possible barriers to integration of technology.

Keywords: Advantages of Computer Technology, Computer and EFL Teaching, EFL High School Students, English learning, Perceptions of EFL learners


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afshari, M., Ghavifekr, S., Siraj, S., & Jing, D. (2013). Students’ attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. Behavioral Sciences, 103, 852-859.

Aryadoust, V., Mehran, P., & Alizadeh, M. (2015). Validating a computer-assisted language learning attitude instrument used in Iranian EFL context: an evidence-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 1-35.

Bramley, D. (2015). Using focus groups for ELT research. Osaka JALT , 98.

Chen, X. B., & Kessler, G. (2013). Action research tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 20-36.

Dashtestani, R. (2013). EFL teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the use of electronic dictionaries for learning English. CALL-EJ, 14(2), 51-65.

Kalanzadeh, G. A., Soleimani, H., & Bakhtiarvand, M. (2014). Exploring the influence of using technology on Iranian EFL students’ motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 814-823.

Khaddage, F. (2013). The iPad global embrace are we branding mobilr learning? Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013, (pp. 3234-3240). New Orleans.

King, I., & Bass, D. (2013, March 15). Microsoft’s Surface tablet Is said to fall short of predictions. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from Bloomberg L.P.: http://www.bloomberg.com/

Kitchakarn, O. (2015). EFL learners’ attitudes towards using computers as a learning tool in language learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 52-58.

Liu, J. (2009). A survey of EFL learners’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 101-106.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research Methodology and Design. New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Nguyen, N. H., & Tri, D. H. (2014). An exploratory study of ICT use in English language learning among EFL university students. Teaching English with Technology, 4, 32-46.

Oz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Digital device ownership, computer literacy, and attitudes toward foreign and computer-assisted language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 359-366.

Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K. E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30.

Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42(02), 147-180.

Warschauer, M. (2013). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO journal, 13(2), 7-26.

Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language teaching. Handbook of Undergraduate Second Language Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zacharias, N. T. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for Second Language Education: A Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.