Using the Think-Aloud Technique for Determining Different Reading Strategies Used by Iranian EFL Learners
Abstract
This study explored the reading strategies used by advanced and intermediate Persian EFL learners in both English and Persian reading comprehension texts. Based on the aims of the study reading comprehension texts were administered to the learners and their reading strategies in both English and Persian reading comprehension texts were examined through the think-aloud method. The findings showed that while the advanced EFL learners employed all the strategies (which were included in the strategy table of the study) in their English texts, the intermediate learners used only some of them and also used their strategies with different frequencies in comparison with the advanced learners. Therefore, the findings supported the view that the use of the reading strategies may be related to the learners’ proficiency level. The findings also supported the idea that reading strategies can be transferred from one language to another based on the learners’ proficiency level.
Keywords: learning strategies, reading strategies, think aloud protocols, threshold level, transferability
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing.Modern Language Journal, 75, 460-472.
Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 3(3), 1-33.
Barnett, M.A. (1989). More than meets the eye. Foreign language reading: Theory and practice. EnglewoodsClifts, N. Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Block, E. L. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers.TESOLQuarterly, 20(3), 463-493.
Clapham, C. (1993). Is ESP testing justified? In D, Doughlas,& C, Chapelle (Eds), A new decade of language testing research: Selected papers from the 1990 language testing research colloquium(pp. 257-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
Cook, L.K. & Mayer, R.E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose.In M. Pressley and J.R Levin (Eds.).Cognitive strategy research.Springler-Verlag: New York.
Cummins, J. (1979).Linguistic interdependence and the educational development ofbilingual children, Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222-251.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nded). Oxford, England Oxford University Press.
Fotuhi, M. &Abbasi, H.(2012).Farsi Omumi: DarsnameyeDaneshgahi. Tehran: MaharatPublication.
Fox, J. & Matthews, C. (1991).Learner strategies and learner needs in the design of CALL help systems, proceedings of EUROCALL. London:Helsinki.
Ghuma, M.A. (2011). The transferability of reading strategies between L1 (Arabic) and L2 (English) (doctoral dissertation).University of Durham: England.
Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guess game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 4, 126-135.
Grabe, W. &Stoller, F. L. (2002) Teaching and researching reading, London: PearsonEducation.
Hudson, T. (1982).The effects of induced schemata on the short circuit in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance, Language Learning, 32 (1), 1-31.
Lesly, T., Hansen, Ch., &Zukowski/Faust, J. (2003).New interchange passages placement andevaluation package. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. (1988). Learning strategies: An overview. In C. Weinstein, E. Goetz,& P. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation (pp. 11-22). New York: Academic Press.
Oster, L. (2001). Using thing-aloud for reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 64–69.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
SevgiOndes, N. (2004). English through reading. Istanbul: YapimTanitimYayincilik LTD.
Tarone, E. (1980).Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language learning, 30, 417-31.
Thorndike, E.L. (1917). Reading as reasoning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323-332.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.