The Double in Quest to Save the Protagonist

Kalina Maleska

Abstract


This essay explores the theme of the double in Umberto Eco’s The Island of the Day Before, Joseph Conrad’s The Secret Sharer and Zivko Chingo’s The Big Water. While traditionally the double is connected with the evil alter-ego of the protagonist, what brings these three works together (by an Italian, English and Macedonian author) is the fact that the treatment of the double in them is different from those traditional representations. The essay will argue that, even if it seems that the double is some kind of more evil variant than the protagonist, he is actually summoned in the three selected works by the protagonist in order to save him from loneliness or threat. Still, the levels of real existence of the double, his roles and functions are different in all three works and these aspects will come into light in their comparison. Each work is analyzed in terms of several theoretical assumptions established Chatman, Genette or Steiner, among others, and each is compared with the other two, thus producing the points of resemblance in terms of the two narrative structures that coexist in all three works.

Keywords: the double, isolation, alienation, Eco, Conrad, Chingo, ideology 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abi-Ezzi, N. (2000). An analysis of the treatment of the double in the work of Robert Louis Stevenson, Wilkie Collins and Daphne du Maurier. PhD thesis submitted to King’s College, University of London, 2000.

Bradford, R. (1997) Stylistics. London: Routledge.

Chatman, S. (1990). Story and narrative. In D. Walder (Ed.), Literature in the modern world: Critical essays and documents (pp. 105-15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Conrad, J. (2002). The secret sharer. In J. Beaty, A. Booth, J. P. Hunter, K. J. Mays (Eds.), The Norton introduction to literature (8th ed.) (pp. 253-8). New York: Norton.

Eco, U. (1995). The island of the day before. (W. Weaver, Trans). New York: Harcourt.

Erdinast-Vulcan, D. (2005). Some millennial footnotes on the heart of darkness”. In C. M. Kaplan, P. L. Mallios and A. White (Eds.), Conrad in the twenty-first century: Contemporary approaches and perspectives (pp. 55-67). New York: Routledge.

Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

McHale, B. (1987). Postmodernist fiction. New York: Methuen.

Miller, K. (2009). Doubles: Studies in literary history. London: Faber.

Ovid, P. N. (2008). The metamorphosis. Project Gutenberg: Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/files/26073/26073-h/26073-h.htm

Rank, O. (1989). The Double: A psychoanalytical study. Harry Tucker (Trans.). London: H. Karnac).

Steiner, G. (1990). The hollow miracle. In D. Walder (Ed.), Literature in the modern world: Critical essays and documents (pp. 346-51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Барт, Р. [Barthes, R.]. (1996). Увод во структуралната анализа на раскажувањето [Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives]. In Атанас Вангелов (Ed. and trans.), Теорија на прозата (pp. 129-78). Скопје: Детска радост.

Чинго, Ж. [Chingo, Z.]. (1971). Golemata voda [The Big Water]. Скопје: Македонска книга.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.