The Tempest: A Negotiable Meta-Panopticon
Abstract
In The Tempest, Shakespeare represents a world in which the model of a panopticon within a panopticon reveals how the power relations functions. All the major and minor characters establish panopticons which start from their own bodies and soul and move toward the larger one which belongs to that of Prospero as the higher order who has access to a magical power and a mysterious police force. As a social group is formed in the play, the individuals in that group seek to make use of the process of testing, recording, explaining to provide obeying subjects. There are negotiations between the subversive voices and the rulers which expose the issue of containment as a personal, social, and cultural production rather than a coercive factor.
Keywords: panopticon, subversion, containment, discipline, punish, negotiation
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carey-Webb, A. (2014). Making Subject(s): Literature and the Emergence of National Identity. Routledge. Google book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=15VIAwAAQBAJ&pg
Chow, R. (2012). Entanglements, Or Transmedial Thinking about Capture. Duke UP.Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=KO3nIGdrx2oC&pg
Campos, M. (2004). The Portrayal of Treason in The Tempest: The Fourfold Role of a Machiavellian Duke. Sederi, (14), pp.208-216.
Danaher, G. (2000). Understanding Foucault. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publication.
Dollimore, J. (1994). Shakespeare, cultural materialism and the new historicism. In J. Dollimore & A. Sinfield (Eds.), Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism (Illustrated, reprint, revised ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=BctZMVhGkHEC&pg
Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P.(1983). Michel Foucault, beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.
------. (2004) “Discipline and Punish.” Literary Theory, an Anthology. Ed. Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Fumerton, P,& Simon H. (Eds.). (1999). Renaissance Culture and the Everyday. U of Pennsylvania. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=4TSde5LI40EC&pg
Grady, H. Containment Subversion -and Postmodernism. (1993). Textual Practice. Ed. Terence Hawkes. Vol. 1. Psychology. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=jq331W-M9ZYC&pg
Greenblatt, S. (2004). Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and Its Subversion, Henry IV and Henry V. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Ed. Russ McDonald. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
------.(2012). Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. U of Chicago. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=XHxWpdvvUs0C&printsec
------. (1988). Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. U of California. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=866eoQY-tXIC&printsec
Hawkes, T. (2005). Textual Practice: Volume 7, Issue 2. Routledge. Google Books Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=Fo2JAgAAQBAJ&dq
Lim, W. (1998). The arts of empire: The poetics of colonialism from Ralegh to Milton (Illustrated ed.). Newark: University of Delaware Press. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=4OVranlVxhcC&pg
Merkel, M. (2013, October 25) Sources and Design of Shakespeare’s Tempest. Edward Oxford Review. Retrieved from Http://www.edwardoxenford.org/tag/sources-and-design-of-shakespeares-tempest
McDonald, R. (Ed.). (2004). Shakespeare: An anthology of criticism and theory, 1945-2000. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Pub.
Montrose, L.A. (1996). The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre. U of Chicago. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=SVTsYd9C274C&dq
------. (2004). Shaping Fantasies: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1945-2000. Ed. Russ McDonald. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Pieters, J. (2001). The Tempest and Its Histories. In Moments of Negotiation: The New Historicism of Stephen Greenblatt . Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=a0Uf3ocKl_QC&pg
Prusko, R. (2013) ‘A Bootless Inquisition’? Reconsidering Miranda. The Tempest Seminar. 2013. Shakespeare Association of America. Retrieved from http://www.shakespeareassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/2013-Abstract-50.pdf
Rivkin, J., & Ryan, M. (Eds.). (2004). Literary theory, an anthology (2nd ed.). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Shakespeare, W. (1993). The Tempest: Entire Play. Retrieved from http://shakespeare.mit.edu/tempest/full.html
Shaughnessy, R. (2013). The Routledge Guide to William Shakespeare. Routledge. Google Book Search. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=yJN4yAsNSYEC&pg>.
Schneider, Jr., B. (1995). “Are We Being Historical Yet?” Colonialist Interpretations of Shakespeare's Tempest. In J. Barroll (Ed.), Shakespeare studies (Illustrated ed., Vol. 23, pp.120-142). Madison, N.J.: Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press.
Wilson, R. (2014). Shakespeare in French Theory: King of Shadows. London: Routledge.
Officer Ranks in the Royal Navy. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.royalnavalmuseum.org/info_sheets_nav_rankings.htm#Flag
Parts of Boats and Ships. (n.d.). Retrieved from http%3A%2F%2Fwww.macmillandictionary.com%2Fthesaurus-category%2Fbritish%2Fparts-of-boats-and-ships
What are Fractals? (2013). Retrieved from http://fractalfoundation.org/resources/what-are-fractals/
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.