Asynchronous Communication: Investigating the Influences of Relational Elements and Background on the Framing Structure of Emails
Abstract
This study explored the influences of relational elements and the background of communicators on the framing structure of email messages that were exchanged in an educational Institute in Malaysia. The investigation revealed that social distance played a more significant role than power relations as Malaysian respondents are, generally, more polite to distant colleagues than they are to close colleagues regardless of their organizational position. It was also revealed that the ethnic background of email writers prompted the framing structure of the emails as the use of the pre-closing move and ‘thank you’ as a closing marker was generally a Malaysian practice. This study also revealed that the framing structure of the emails depended on the direction of the message as the majority of the emails that were sent to external contacts included an auto signature, whereas the internally exchanged email were mainly signed off using the first name of the sender alone. In addition, it was revealed that email writers in the educational Institute had a very high tendency to name their messages as almost 100 percent of the emails included the identifying topic move, which was generally clearly or broadly informative move.
Keywords: Email communication, Relational factors, Framing moves, Social distance, Power relations
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akar, D. (1998). Patterns and variations in contemporary written business communication in Turkey: A genre study of four companies (Unpublished dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
AlAfnan, M. A. (2015a, in press). Language use in computer-mediated communication: An investigation into the genre of workplace emails. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 3(1).
AlAfnan, M. A. (2015b, in press). Analyzing the rhetorical, typographical and paralinguistic features of electronic mails in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(4).
AlAfnan, M. A. (2014a). Politeness in business writing: The effects of ethnicity and relating factors on email communication. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4(2), 275-289. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2014.42022.
AlAfnan, M. A. (2014b, March 27-28). Interethnic workplace communication: An investigation into politeness strategies. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Public Management and Education Research in Tianjin, China (iceeim-14). doi:10.2991/iceeim-14.2014.61
Al-Ali, M. N., & Sahawneh, M. (2008). An investigation into the generic features of English requestive e-mail messages. LSP & Professional Communication, 8(2), 40- 65. Retrieved from http://rauli.cbs.dk/index
Alatalo, P. (2002). Repair work interaction in business e-mail messages, with special reference to interpersonal metadiscourse (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Baron, N. S. (1984). Computer mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, 18(2), 118-141. Retrieved from ERIC database.
Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication, 18, 133-170. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00005-6
Crystal, D. (2001). The language of e-mail. In Language and the Internet (pp. 94-128). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Du Bartell, D. (1995). Discourse features of computer-mediated communication: “Spoken-like” and “written-like.” In B. Wårvik, S.-K. Tanskanen, & R. Hiltunen (Eds.), Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from the Turku Conference, Vol. 14. Turku, Finland: University of Turku, Department of English.
Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34. doi: 10.1177/0741088391008001002
Gimenez, J. C. (2000). Business e-mail communication: Some emerging tendencies in register. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3), 237-251. doi: 10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00030-1
Grzege, J. (1999). Some observations on email style vs traditional styles. Papier zur Linguistik, 60(1), 3-16.
Hafner, K., & Lyon, M. (1996). Where wizards stay up late: The origins of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Herring, S. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message schema. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81-105). Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamins.
Licklider, J. C. R, & Vezza, A. (1978). Applications of information networks. Proceedings of the IEEE. 66(11), 1330-1346.
Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium for managerial choice. Organization Science, 5(4), 502-527. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635179
Mulholland, J. (1999). E-mail: Uses, issues and problems in an institutional setting. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & C. Nickerson (Eds.), Writing business: Genres, media and discourses (pp. 57-84). London, England: Longman.
Ng, Y. K. (2003). A discourse analysis of e-mail messages in a Malaysian business community. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 3(1). Retrieved from http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/~ppbl/Gema/GemaVol3.1.2003No3.pdf
Nickerson, C. (1998). Corporate culture and the use of written English within British subsidiaries in the Netherlands. English for Specific Purposes, 17(3), 281-294. doi: 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00015-X
Nickerson, C. (1999). The use of English in electronic mail in a multinational corporation. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & C. Nickerson (eds.), Writing business: Genres, media and discourses. London, England: Longman.
Nickerson, C. (2000). Playing the corporate language game: An investigation of the genres and discourse strategies in English used by Dutch writers in multinational corporations. Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication (Vol. 15). Amsterdam, Holland: Rodopi.
Nor Azni Abdullah. (2006, December). Constructing business email messages: A model of writers’ choice. ESP Malaysia, 12, 53-63. Retrieved from http://www.penerbit.utm.my/OnlineEspMalaysia/12/Artikel_53_63.pdf
Peter, I. (2014, October 10). The beginnings of the Internet. Retrieved from Net History website: http://www.nethistory.info/History%20of%20the%20Internet/beginnings.html
Rafi, M. S. (2009). SMS text analysis: Language gender and current practices. Journal of TESOL France. Retrieved from http://www.tesol-france.org/Documents/Colloque
Rice, R. E., & Borgman, C. L. (1983). The use of computer-monitored data in information science and communication research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 247-256. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630340404
Scheyder, E. C. (2003). The use of complementary closing in emails: American English examples. Working papers in Educational linguistics, 19 (1), 27-42. Retrieved from http://www.wpel.net/v19/v19n1_Scheyder.pdf
Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). In: A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language (pp. 100-116). Clevendon, England: British Association for Applied Linguistics.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Waldvogel, J. (2005). The role, status and style of workplace email: A study of two New Zealand workplaces (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand). Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/330
Waldvogel, J. (2007). Greetings and closings in workplace email. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), article 6. Retrieved November 13, 2008from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/waldvogel.html
Wilson, E. V. (2002). Email winners and losers. Communication of the ACM, 45(10), 121-126. doi: 10.1145/570907.570908
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.