The Use of Fundamental Rights as Active And Responsible Citizens: Tendencies of Social Studies Teacher Candidates

Davut Gürel

Abstract


This study aimed to determine the tendencies of social studies teacher candidates, whose primary purpose is to raise active and responsible citizens, towards the use of fundamental rights. The study adopted a survey methodology and reached a total of 356 students studying in the Social Studies Teacher Education undergraduate program at 7 universities in different regions of Turkey. The data collected from these students with a Likert-type survey of ten dimensions, consisting of 48 items and five options, were analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 package program. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test and ANOVA. The analysis of the collected data showed that the scores obtained from the sub-factors of the survey, access to court and exercising consumer rights, differed significantly in favor of women, and conscious citizenship and taking responsibility differed significantly in favor of men. While none of the scores obtained from all sub-dimensions of the survey differed significantly according to the place of residence of the students, the right to petition, the right to lockout, the right to access court and conscious citizenship and taking responsibility differed according to the undergraduate class level. The overall assessment of the results is that the tendencies towards the exercise of fundamental rights do not differ significantly by students’ gender, class level and place of residence, and the overall tendencies in exercising these rights are above average, but not very high.

Keywords


Fundamental rights, Active citizen, Responsible citizen, Social studies, Teacher candidates, Seek rights, Legal literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ada, Ş., & Koç, M. (2000). Üniversite öğrencilerinin lisans eğitimleri süresince demokratik tutumlardaki değişmelerin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [The examining in terms of various variables of changes in democratic attitudes of university students during undergraduate education]. In IX. National Educational Sciences Congress Proceedings (pp. 796-808). Atatürk University Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education, Erzurum.

Akçay, P., & Güler, G. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin hak arama tutumları [Right-seeking attitudes of university students]. In EJER Congress 2020 Abstracts (pp. 78-80). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/64992288/ejer_2020_ozet.pdf#page=95

Akın, U., & Özdemir, M. (2009). The examination of teacher candidates’ democratic values in terms of various variables: the case of faculty of educational sciences. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 42(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001182

Arslan, A., & Çalmaşur, H. (2017). Analysis of multiculturalism and democratic attitude of elementary and secondary grade teachers in the sense of various variables. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 34, 90-109.

Arslan, H., Dil, K., Çetin, E., & Yazıcı, S. (2017). Active citizenship self-efficacy scale: A reliability and validity study. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2797-2809. https://doi:10.14687/jhs.v14i3.4771

Aydın, B. (2013). The right of access to a court in the area of administrative jurisdiction in Turkey. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 15, 271-296.

Bain, C. (2009). Untangling legal issues that affect teachers and student teachers. Art Education, 62(5), 47-53.

Bal, H. (2012). Hukuk sosyolojisi. (3rd ed.). Fakülte Kitapevi.

Beetham, D. (2006). Demokrasi ve insan hakları. (B. Canatan, Trans.), Liberte Yayınları.

Belge, Z. S. (2020). Planning process and the role of the planner in communities of active and passive citizens. İdealkent, 11(29), 350-372. DOI:10.31198/idealkent.681057

Bingül, A. (2020). Hak arama hürriyeti [Freedom of seek right]. Retrieved from: https://www.imgehukuk.com.tr/blog/hak-arama-hurriyeti/

Bulut, N. (2006). The relations between the democratic attitudes of a group of university students and some variables. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 45(45), 37-59.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F., (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Academy Publication.

Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process with SPSS]. Pegem Academy Publication.

Çayan, G. (2016). The right of access to court in the light of European court of human rights and constitutional court decisions. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 28, 235-272.

Çeçen, A. (2013). Human rights and humanitarian law. Journal of Yaşar University, 8, 809-830. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jyasar/issue/19146/203178

Çelik, A. (2019). Unionization, collective bargaining and strike tendencies in turkey through 2010's under the strain of symbiotic relationships and authoritarian corporatism. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 15(15), 39-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2019CEEIK201854097

Çermik, H. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ democratic values and investigation of these values based on some variables. Education Sciences, 8(2), 261-274.

Çetin, O. (2007). The Freedom of justice demanding [Unpublished master's thesis]. Dokuz Eylul University Graduate School of Social Sciences, İzmir.

Çildan, C., Ertemiz, M., Tumuçin, H. K., Küçük, E., & Albayrak, D. (2012). Role of social media in Political Participation and Actions. Akademik Bilişim 2012 Congress Abstract, Retrieved from https://ab.org.tr/ab12/bildiri/205.pdf

Coady, M. M., Corbett, E. A., Falconer, S. R., Grierson, J., Smith, D. & Gregory V. (1950). A working philosophy for Canadian adult education. Kidd, J. R. (Ed.). In Adult Education in Canada (pp. 11-39), Canadian Association for Adult Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED024875

Demirci, K. (2015). E-government applications in turkey from the point of state-citizens relations: The BIMER case. The Journal of Akdeniz University's Faculty of Communication, 23, 96-113.

Demoulin, D. F., & Kolstad, R. (2000). Assessing the gains of behavioral dynamics essential for success in democracy for teacher education students. College Student Journal, 34(3), 417- 422.

Duman, B. (2004). The Authority to conclude collective work contract according to the Law of Collective Work Contract, Strike and Lockout numbered 2822 [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.

Ektem, I. S., & Sünbül, A. M. (2011A study into the democratic attitudes of the prospective teachers. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Education Journal, 31, 159- 168.

Ercoşkun, M. H., & Nalçacı, A. (2008). The investigation of the empathic skills and democratic attitudes of the primary school teacher candidate. Milli Eğitim, 37(180), 204-215.

Erdem, C., & Koçyiğit, M. (2019). Exploring undergraduates’ digital citizenship levels: adaptation of the digital citizenship scale to Turkish. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 22-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.03.003

Erdoğan M., Arslan Z., Uzak A., Altuntaş M. & Birincioğlu, A.Y. (2006). İnsan hakları: Temel bilgiler, koruma mekanizmaları, il ve ilçe insan hakları kurulları [Human rights: Basic information, protection mechanisms, provincial and district human rights committees]. Matus.

Ertan, B. (2013). Yeni insan hakları [New human rights]. K. Akkoyunlu Ertan (Ed.), In Yeni kuşak insan hakları [New generation human rights] (pp. 23-46), Institute of Public Administration for Turkey and the Middle East.

Ertuğrul, H., & Turpçu, H. (2018). Temel hukuk [Basic law]. (8th Ed.). Nobel.

Garner, D. R. (2000). The knowledge of legal issues needed by teachers and student teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY.

Gömleksiz, M. N., & Kan, A. Ü. (2008). Eğitim fakültesi ve tezsiz yüksek lisans programlarına kayıtlı öğretmen adaylarının demokratik tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the democratic attitudes of teacher candidates enrolled education faculties and non-thesis master's programs]. Milli Eğitim, 178(1), 44–64.

Hablemitoğlu, Ş., & Özmete, E. (2012). A suggestion for effective citizenship education. Ankara University Faculty of Health Sciences, 1(3), 39-54.

Hız, Y., & Yılmaz, Z. (2004). Bilgi edinme ve dilekçe hakkı: Açıklamalı, notlu, gerekçeli [Right to information and petition: expositional, annotated, reasoned]. Seçkin.

İmren, E. Ş., & Güven, A. (2007). Demokratik ve şeffaf yönetimi anlamlandıran bir hak: Bilgi edinme hakkı [A right that gives meaning to democratic and transparent administration: The right to information]. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2(1), 257-272.

Kaboğlu, İ. Ö. (2004). İnsan haklarına yönelik örtülü bir tehdit: 3D eksikliği [A veiled threat to human rights: the lack of 3D.]. In İ. Kaçuradi (Ed.), Threats to human rights in the beginning of the twenty-first century (pp. 23-46), Hacettepe University Human Rights and Philosophy Research and Application Center.

Kaçuradi, I. (2016). İnsan hakları: Kavramları ve sorunları [Human rights: Concepts and problems]. (3rd Ed.). Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu.

Kapani, M. (1991). İnsan haklarının uluslararası boyutu [The international dimension of human rights. (2nd Ed.). Bilgi Publishing House.

Kara, H., & Tangülü, Z. (2017). A case study on legal and political literacy at the social studies curriculum. Research and Experience Journal (REJ), 2(1), 1-28.

Kara, H., & Tangülü, Z. (2021). Determination of legal literacy levels of social studies teacher candidates studying in turkey. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 341-359.

Karahan, T. F., Sardoğan, M. E., Özkamalı, E. ve Dicle, A. N. (2006). Democratic attitude, neurotic tendencies and self-actualization in prospective-teachers. H.U. Journal of Education 30, 149-158

Kaya, P. A., & Güler, C. (2015). Collective action right in international law of human rights. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 68, 105-126. http://dergipark.gov.tr/iusskd

Kayar, İ., & Üzülmez, İ. (2017). Hukukun temel kavramları [The basic concepts of law] (10th Ed.). Seçkin.

Kayıkçı, K. (2013). Unionization in the public and education sector in turkey, and expectations of school administrators and teachers expectations from unions. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 47(1), 99-126.

Kenan, K. (2007). Right of petition in Turkey [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.

Köse, T. Ç., & Bursa, S. (2020). Pre-service social studies teachers’ perceptions of legal literacy. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 33(2), 372-388.

Kutal, M. (2013). Hukuki açıdan lokavt [Lockout in terms of law]. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 24, 159-190.

Kutsyuruba, B., Murray, J., & Hogenkamp, S. (2019). Understanding Pre-Service Teachers’ Legal Literacy and Experiences with Legal Issues in Practicum Placements: An Exploratory Study. Canadian journal of educational administration and policy, 191, 54-71.

Oğuzman, K. (1962) Toplu sözleşme grev ve lokavt kanunu tasarısı tahlil ve tenkidi [Analysis and criticism of the collective agreement strike and lockout law draft]. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 28(2), 407-429.

Öktem, N., & Türkbağ, A.U. (2014). Felsefe, sosyoloji, hukuk ve devlet [Philosophy, sociology, law and the state] (6th ed.). Dar Publications.

Özkul, Z. (2011). Right to strike in the Turkish Constitutional order and in international human rights conventions [Unpublished master’s thesis]. İstanbul University Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.

Patrick, J. J. (1999). The Concept of Citizenship in Education for Democracy. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED432532

Posocco, S. C. L. (2016). The importance of legal literacy in education [Master of Teaching thesis]. University of Toronto.

Sağlam, F. (2011). İnsan hakları evrensel bildirgesinin BM’de kabulünün 60. Yıldönümünde sosyal haklar [Social rights in the 60th Anniversary of the agreement of the universal declaration of human rights in the UN.]. In İnsan hakları evrensel bildirgesinin 60. yılında insan hakları [Human rights in the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights] İ. Kaçuradi (Ed), (pp.113-119), Maltepe University Publications, No. 42.

Sağlam, H. İ. (2000). Sosyal bilgiler dersinin demokratik tutum geliştirmedeki rolü [The role of social studies course in developing democratic attitudes]. Milli Eğitim, 147, 67-71.

Şahan, G. (2018). Evaluation of democratic owners who have teacher nominated formation education. Turkish Studies, 13(4), 1045-1056. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13006

Şahin, A., & Örselli, E. (2003). E-devlet anlayışı sürecinde Türkiye [Turkey in the process of e-government understanding.]. Selçuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal (SUSBED) 9, 343-356.

Şahin, İ., Şahin-Fırat, N., Zoraloğlu, Y.R. & Açıkgöz, K. (2009). The problems of university students. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(4), 1435-1449. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/nwsaedu/issue/19826/212403

Schimmel, D., & Militello, M. (2011). The risks of legally illiterate teachers: The findings, the consequences and the solution. University of Massachusetts Law Review, 6(1), 37-55.

Schopenhauer, A. (2013). İnsan doğası üzerine [On human nature]. (E. Yıldırım, Trans.). Oda Publications.

Selvi, Ö., Ulucan, M., & Coşgun, A. E. (2019). Public relations and CIMER as an e-government application. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 75, 13-37.

Şirin, T. (2013). Constitutional problems of freedom of assembly in turkey. Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(4), 289-316.

Sirmen, L. (2013). The purpose and the characteristics of consumer law. Journal of Yaşar University, 8(1), 2465-2476.

Sönmez, Ö. F., İrşi, E., Önlen, M., & Polat, U. (2019). 2018 investigation of 2018 secondary school curriculum in terms of legal literacy. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 20(2), 906-928.

Tabak, B. (2018). Emniyete veya savcılığa şikayet nasıl yapılır? [How to make a complaint to the police or prosecution office]. Retrieved from https://www.tabakhukuk.com/emniyete-veya-savciliga-sikayet-nasil-yapilir

Tanyar, Z. Ç. (2011). Right to freedom of assembly under the case law of European court of human rights. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Law], 60(3), 593-634.

Tepe, H. (2011). İnsan hakları eğitiminden beklenenler [Expectations from human rights education]. In İ. Kaçuradi (Ed.), İnsan hakları evrensel bildirgesinin 60. yılında insan hakları [Human rights in the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights] (pp.152-157), Maltepe University Publications, No. 42.

Tepe, H. (2013). İnsan hakları ve evrensellik tartışması [Human rights and universality debate]. In K. Akkoyunlu Ertan (Ed.), Yeni kuşak insan hakları [New generation human rights] (pp. 23-46), Institute of Public Administration for Turkey and the Middle East.

Tepe, H. (2014). Rethinking human nature as a basis for human rights. In M. Albers T. Hoffmann & J. Reinhardth (Eds.), In Human Rights and Human Nature, (pp.57-77), Springer.

Türk, G. D. (2013). Demokrasinin dördüncü kuvveti yeni medya teknolojileri [New media technologies as the fourth force of democracy]. XVIII.Internet Conference of Turkey Proceedings, 55-60.

Tutkun, T. (2013). The relationship between teacher candidates’ media literacy level and participation levels to representative democracy, protest and social change dimensions of active citizenship [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.

Ünal, F. (2019). Vatandaşlık yaklaşımları, vatandaşlık bilinci karma araştırma örneği [Citizenship approaches: an example of citizenship awareness mixed research]. Pegem Academy Publication. DOI 10.14527/9786056991639.

Urhan, B., & Selamoğlu, A. (2008). Workers’ attitudes and behaviours towards the trade unions; the case of kocaeli. Labour and Society, 3(18), 171-197.

Uysal, A., & Cömert, Y. (2017). Motivation of consumers for participation in boycotts: the example of Muş. Journal of Academic Approaches, 8(1), 97-125.

Yeşil, R. (2018). The scale of civilization perception: the validity and reliability study. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 7(1), 77-88.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.1p.219

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.