Role of the CEFR and English Teaching in Thailand: A Case Study of Rajabhat Universities

Kanjana Charttrakul, Anamai Damnet

Abstract


In 2016, Thai Ministry of Education (MOE) has announced the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages or the CEFR (Council of Europe, 2001) as a guideline for teachers in primary and secondary schools. This has inevitably affected Rajabhat Universities (RUs) in the country that have major roles and responsibilities in producing pre-service English teachers. This paper presents the results of an investigation of English teachers’ perceptions at Rajabhat universities in Bangkok and suburban areas. Participants were 67 teachers in total. A mixed-methods approach was employed for data collection. Research tools are a set of questionnaire and an individual semi-structured interview. An interview was conducted with 6 teachers in 6 RUs, each was purposively selected. Data analysis employed frequency, means, and standard deviation, while Grounded theory (Strauss & Corbin, 1999) was used for interview data analysis. Findings indicate the participants mostly agreed with the MOE’s launching the CEFR policy and reflected they could apply the CEFR as a guideline in teaching and learning management. However, data from the in-depth interview revealed both advantages and disadvantages of the CEFR. This study might be a kind of mirror for policy makers and practitioners at both policy and classroom pedagogy levels who advocate the CEFR policy in Thailand.

Keywords


CEFR, MOE, Pre-service Teachers, and Rajabhat Universities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cambridge ESOL. (2011). Using the CEFR: Principles of good practice. Cambridge. Retrieved April 2016, from www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/126011-using-cefr-principles-of-good-practice.pdf

Charttrakul, K. (2009). An implementation of a collaborative Internet-based project for Thai EFL students. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Department of Language, Literacy and Arts Education, Melbourne.

Charttrakul, K., Anchaleewittayakul, W., Sukkara, P., Chirasawadi, S., & Deesiri, K. (2011). Developing an innovation for teaching English at primary levels using cooperative language learning approach. Bangkok: Suan Dusit Rajabhat University.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved March 5, 2016, from https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf

Council of Europe. (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved February 2016, from www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Eleonora, M. (2015). The impact of the Common European Framework of Reference on foreign language instruction: The case of sociolinguistic and pragmatic competence. University of Toronto (Canada), Curriculum, Teaching and Learning. Ann Arbor: Proquest. Retrieved 2016, from http://search.proquest.com.portal.lib.ku.ac.th/docview/1746693292?accountid=48250

Ellis, R. (2008). Second language acquistion. Oxford: Oxford University.

English Language Institute. (2016, February 6). คู่มือการจัดการเรียนการสอนตามกรอบ CEFR. Retrieved May 2016, from English Language Institute, Ministry of Education: http://english.obec.go.th/english/2013/index.php/en/2012-08-08-10-26-5/74-cefr

Figueras, N. (2012). The impact of the CEFR. ELT Journal, 66/4(Special issue October 2012), 477- 485. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs037

Harmer, J. (2007). THe practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the laaanguage classroom. Oxford: Oxford University.

Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Liddicoat, A. J. (2014). The interface between macro and micro-level language policy and the place of language pedagogies. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 9(2), 118-129. Retrieved September 17, 2017, from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1643396355?accountid=48250

Mala, D. (2016, Mar 22). O-Net scores rise, students still failing: Grade 12 results show signs of 'inequality'. Retrieved May 2016, from Bangkokpost: http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/general/905620/o-net-scores-rise-students-still-failing

Maxwell, D. (2015, April). Thai schools adopt Europen Framwork to boost English langauge proficiency. Retrieved May 2016, from Asian News: https://asiancorrespondent.com/2015/04/thai-schools-adopt-european-framework-to-boost-english-language-proficiency/

Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge.

Owen, J. M., & Rogers, P. J. (1999). Program evaluation: forms and approaches. NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

Pearson Longman. (2013). Teacher's guide to the Common European Framework. Retrieved March 5, 2016, from http://longman.com/cef: http://www.euddansk.dk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cefguide.pdf

Prasansaph, W. (2009). Task-based learning for oral communication: A case study of Thai EFL learners. Doctoral thesis, The University of Melbourne,, Language and Literacy Department, and Arts Education, Melbourne.

Read, J. (2014). The influence of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) in the Asia-Pacific Region. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (LEARN) Journal(Special Issue 2014), 32-39. Retrieved 2016

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

Tannenbaum, R. J., & Wylie, C. (2014). Linking English-language test scores onto the Common European Framework of Reference: An application of standard-setting methodology. ETS Research Report Series, 2008(1). Retrieved March 5, 2016

Weicheng, Z. (2012). Perspectives from China. In M. Byram, & L. Parmenter (Eds.), The Common European Framework of Reference: The globalisation of language education policy (pp. 183-197). Bristol,UK: Multilingual Matters.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.2.p.82

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.