Vocabulary Instruction: Software Flashcards vs. Word Clouds
Abstract
When it comes to language learning, vocabulary learning is the main activity focused on. Vocabulary learning is the main problem and also the goal of new language learners. It is one of the major problems that language learners encounter during learning a new language. Krashen (1989) (cited in Tokac, 2005) points out the role of vocabulary in a language by stating that most of the meaning in a language is carried by words. This is why people visiting a foreign country prefer to take their dictionaries with them rather than grammar books. And on the other hand, nowadays everything is connected to technology and language learning and teaching is not an exception. As Stockwell (2007) cites, vocabulary has been one of the most commonly taught language areas through technology in recent years. Integration of computer and second/foreign language teaching is admired by many researchers. It is clear that technology can help enhance the degree of vocabulary learning, but the point is that which computer assisted vocabulary learning can work better and would be more efficient?
In this paper we will discuss and analyze the usage of two kinds of different ways of using technology and see which of the methods will work better. A comparison between vocabulary software flashcard and word clouds (Wordle) on vocabulary learning (retention) will be compared by the researcher. We will see that using which method will encourage learners more and they will do better with which kind of using technology? The study is carried out in Iran on 44 English learners. The result is really surprising. Both of the groups were interested in technology, but one group did really better.
Keywords: CALL, CAVL, Software flashcard, Word Clouds, Wordle, Vocabulary learning
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, V. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Vocabulary. New York: Oxford.
Al-Maamary, F. (n.d.) Using word clouds, The More Frequent, the Bigger. Sultan Qaboos University
Baleghizadeh, S. and Ashoori, A. (2011). The impact of two instructional techniques on EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge: flash cards versus word lists. MEXTESOL Journal, 35; 2, 1-9
Cahpelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2; 1, 21-39.
Eslahcar, M. & Khodareza, M. (2012). The effect of using vocabulary flashcard on Iranian pre-university students’ vocabulary knowledge. International Education Studies, 5; 3, 134-147.
Gorjian, B. Moosavinia, R. Ebrahimi, K. Asgari, P. Hydarei, A. (2011). The impact of Asynchronous computer-assisted language learning approaches on English as a Foreign Language high and low achievers’ vocabulary retention and recall. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24; 5, 383-391.
Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in foreign language, 17, 23-59.
Mahmoodi, M., & Talang, T. (2013). The Effect of Using Word Clouds on EFL Students' Long-Term Vocabulary Retention. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 74-106
Meara, P. (2005). English vocabulary. Pearson education.
Seal, B. (1991). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (296-311). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the Move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20; 4, 365-383.
Thu, T. H. (2009). Learning strategies used by successful language learners. Online Submission.
Tokac, A. (2005). A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Vocabulary Instruction and Teacher-led Vocabulary Instruction. The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University.
Zhao, Y. Torres, M. Smith, B. Tan, H. (2004). The NON-NEUTRALITY of Technology: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Study of Computer Mediated Communication Technologies. J. Educational Computer Research, 30; 1&2, 23-55
Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Historical trends in second language vocabulary instruction. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.