Sentence-level vs. NP-level Genericity: Are Arabic Learners of English Sensitive to Genericity Type?

Abdulrahman Alzamil

Abstract


The study was conducted to investigate the L2 acquisition of English generics by L1 Arabic speakers. The present study considered the two types of genericity (NP-level vs. sentence-level). Since generics in Arabic are always definite, the study investigated whether L1 Arabic speakers perform similarly in both types. The study recruited 43 participants (36 Saudi-Arabic-speaking participants and seven native English speakers). The Saudi-Arabic-speaking participants were assigned to two proficiency levels (23 elementary and 13 lower intermediate) in accordance with the Oxford Quick Placement Test. An Acceptability Judgement Task was administered to test their use of English generics. Five types of nouns were used (definite singulars and plurals, indefinite singulars and plurals, and bare singulars). The results revealed that: a) statistically, the Arabic speakers were significantly less accurate than the native English speakers; b) the Arabic speakers rated the non-target definite plurals highly in both types of genericity; and c) they rated the target indefinite singulars low with sentence-level genericity. These findings demonstrated that Arabic speakers were sensitive to genericity type, and that their selections cannot be explained solely in terms of their L1.

Keywords


L2 Acquisition, Genericity, Arabic, EFL Learners, L1 Transfer

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alzamil, A. (2016). The second language acquisition of English indefiniteness and genericity by L1 Saudi Arabic and L1 Mandarin speakers. Ph.D. Thesis. Newcastle University.

Avery, P., & Radisic, M. (2007). Accounting for variability in the acquisition of English articles. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA) (pp. 1-11). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.

Chiang, D., Diab, M. T., Habash, N., Rambow, O., & Shareef, S. (2006). Parsing Arabic dialects. In Proceedings of the 11th conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 369-376).

Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across language. Natural language semantics, 6(4), 339-405.

Dayal, V. (2004). Number marking and (in) definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and philosophy, 27(4), 393-450.

García Mayo, M. P. (2008). The acquisition of four nongeneric uses of the article the by Spanish EFL learners. System, 36(4), 550-565.

Goad, H., & White, L. (2009). Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. In N. Snape, Y.-k. I. Leung, & M. S. Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp. 1-26). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Goad, H., White, L., & de Garavito, J. B. (2011). Prosodic transfer at different levels of structure: The L2 acquisition of Spanish plurals. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston university conference on language development: Online supplement (pp. 1-9). Somerville: Mass: Cascadilla Press.

Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The Failed Functional Features Hypothesis. Second language research, 13, 187-226.

Huebner, T. (1983). A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.

Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language acquisition, 12(1), 3 - 69.

Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1 transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2 English. Language learning, 60, 877-925.

Ionin, T., Montrul, S., Kim, J.-H., & Philippov, V. (2011). Genericity distinctions and the interpretation of determiners in second language acquisition. Language acquisition, 18(4), 242-280. doi:10.1080/10489223.2011.610264

Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L., & Maldonado, S. B. (2008). Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles. Lingua, 118(4), 554-576.

Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: an introduction. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1-124). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Kupisch, T. (2012). Specific and generic subjects in the Italian of German-Italian simultaneous bilinguals and L2 learners. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 15(4), 736-756.

Longobardi, G. (2001). How comparative is semantics? A unified Parametric Theory of bare nouns and proper names. Natural language semantics, 9(4), 335-369.

Parrish, B. (1987). A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language learning, 37, 361-383.

Reiter, N., & Frank, A. (2010). Identifying generic noun phrases. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 40-49).

Sarko, G. (2009). The Acquisition of the English Article System by L1 Syrian Arab and French Learners of English. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Essex.

Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners' accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language learning, 64(1), 103-131.

Snape, N. (2006). The acquisition of the English determiner phrase by Japanese and Spanish learners of English. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Essex.

Snape, N., Hirakawa, M., Hirakawa, Y., Hosoi, H., & Matthews, J. (2014). L2 English Generics: Japanese child returnees' incomplete acquisition or attrition? Paper presented at the the 2012 Second Language Research Forum.

Thomas, M. (1989). The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied psycholinguistics, 10(03), 335-355.

Tryzna, M. (2009). Questioning the validity of the Article Choice Parameter and the Fluctuation Hypothesis. Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications, 49, 67-86.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.2p.95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.