A Cognitive Approach to EkeGusii Pop Songs

Victor Ondara Ntabo, Moses Gatambuki Gathigia, Naom Moraa Nyarigoti

Abstract


A review of literature on pop songs reveals that composers use metaphors to communicate their feelings. In particular, the meaning of the metaphors in EkeGusii pop songs needs to be interpreted to reveal the message of the composers. The EkeGusii pop singer Christopher Mosioma’s (Embarambamba) songs have gained fame in Kenya because of their richness in the usage of metaphors. One of Christopher Mosioma’s songs, amasomo (education) which was launched in 2015 has gained acclaim from Kenyans. The song amasomo (education) is basically presented as a piece of advice to students to embrace education in order to optimally reap from its benefits. The study identified 10 metaphors in the song amasomo (education) through the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit. In order to interpret the metaphors in the EkeGusii pop song amasomo (education), the Conceptual Metaphor Theory complemented by the folk conception of the generic Great Chain of Being Metaphor were employed. The study employed four coders (including the researchers) in the identification of the metaphors. The study found that, inter alia, animal, plant and object metaphors are used in the song amasomo (education). The study concludes that the metaphors in the EkeGusii pop songs belong inherently to different levels of the generic Great Chain of Being Metaphor.

Keywords


Amasomo, CMT, Great Chain of Being Metaphor, MIPVU, Pop Songs,

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahrens, K. (2002). When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairings in the contemporary theory of metaphor. Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 273-302). Cheng-Chi University, China.

Akama, J. S., & Maxon, M. (Eds) (2006). Ethnography of the Gusii of Western Kenya: A vanishing cultural heritage. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Aunga, S. (2011). The nature of homonymous and polysemous relations in EkeGusii (Unpublished MA thesis), Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Allen, S. R. (2017). Food science education and websites. Journal of Food Science Education, 16 (1), 4-5.

Armi, E. (2006). The art of American automobile design. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.

Bicknell, J. (2002). Can music convey semantic content? A Kantian approach. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60 (3), 253-261.

Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32, 77-96.

Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions (3rd ed.). California: Thousand Oaks.

Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

De Nora, T. (2001). Aesthetic agency and musical practice: New directions in the sociology of music and emotion. In J.A. Sloboda and P. Juslin (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp.161-180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eleanor, A. C. (2006). The impact of idealized images of female beauty of women’s self concept: Who does it affect and when? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Massachusetts, USA.

Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idiom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Guthrie, M. (1971). Comparative Bantu: An introduction to the Comparative Linguistics pre-history of Bantu languages. Farnborough: Gregg press.

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive semantics: An introduction. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Feinstein, J. (2015). Examining the effects of human-animal interaction on individuals with developmental disabilities (Unpublished MA thesis), Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.

Finch, G. (2000). Linguistic terms and concepts. New York: Palgrave.

Franklin, S. P. (2011). Being human, being church: The significance of the theological anthropology for ecclesiology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), McMaster Divinity College, USA.

Hatch, D., & Milwad, S. (1987). From blues to rock. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2010). The economics of M-PESA. Innovations, 4 (2), 4-20.

Jenkins, S. (2011). Changing fortunes: Income mobility and poverty dynamics in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jones, A. (2006). Violence and “othering” in colonial and post colonial Africa. Case study: Banda’s Malawi. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 18 (2), 197 -213.

Khamis, S. A. (2005). Clash of interests and conceptualization of Taarab in East Africa, Swahili Form, 12, 133-159.

Kleparski, G.A. (2008). The joys and sorrows of metaphorical consumption: Mozarellas, prostisciuttos, muttons and yum-yum girls – foodsemy with a romance accent, Z e s z y t y n a u k owe Uniwersyteturzeszowskiego, Seria Filologiczna Studiaanglicare Soviensia, 5, 45-59.

Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphor of anger, pride and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kövecses, Z. (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krzeszowski, T. P. (1997). Angels and devils in Hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warszawa: Wydawnic two Energeia.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chocago Press.

Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Laura, A. J. (2004). A metaphor is in search of a source domain. The categories of Slavic aspect. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 171-527.

López, I. (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación/ Culture, Language and Representation, 7 (7), 77-100.

Manaseh, A.M. (2016). Instructional leadership: The role of heads of schools in managing the instructional programme. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 4 (1), 30-47.

McDonald, R. (2002). What are musical identities, and why are they important? In R. Mc Donald, D.J. Hargreaves & D. Miell (Eds.), Musical identities (pp. 1-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morawczynski, O. (2010). Examining the adoption, usage and outcomes of mobile money service: The case of M-PESA in Kenya (Unpublished doctoral thesis), the University of Edinburg, USA.

Palinkas, I. (2006). The development of the senses argumentum. Kossuth Egyetemi Kiado, Derecen, 2, 191-197.

Pallais, A. (2014). Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets. American Economic Review, 104, 3565-3599.

Rhodes, L. K. (2010). An apparent ugliness: Fashion and dressing poor (Unpublished MA thesis), RMIT Unuversity, Australia.

Rosinska, F.S. (2016). The comparison of a human being is a plant metaphor between English and Polish language. World Journal of Social Science, 3 (1) 15-21.

Scruton, R. (2005). Philosophy: Principles and problems. London: The University of Chicago Press.

Spivy, R. C. (2007). Analysis of ride quality of tractors semi-trailers (Unpublished MSC thesis), Clemson University, USA.

Steen, G., et al. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Simon, F., & Wills, S. (2001). The Cambridge companion to pop and rock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sullivan, S. (2013). Pop music. Encyclopedia of great popular song recording, 2, 101-103.

The Holy Bible (1982). New King James Version. Philadelphia: National Publishing Company.

Wheeler, M. (1994). Heaven, hell and the Victorians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.166

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.