Dimension of Experience: Metadiscourse in the Texts of Novice Non-Native, Novice Native and Expert Native Speaker
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English (vol. 24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Akbaş, E. (2012). Exploring metadiscourse in master’s dissertation abstracts: Cultural and linguistic variations across postgraduate writers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1, 12-26.
Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31(2), 151-183.
Bayyurt, Y. (2010). Hedging in L1 and L2 student writing: A case in Turkey. In: Kincses-Nagy, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Turkish Linguistics. Szeged University Press, Szeged, pp. 123-132.
Bayyurt, Y., & Akbaş, E. (2014). Akademik metinlerde kaçınma ve vurgulayıcı ifadelerin lisansüstü öğrenciler tarafından algılanması ve kullanılması [Graduate students’ perception and use of hedges and boosters in academic texts]. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara, pp. 72-79.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35.
Can, C. (2006). An analysis of freshman year university students’ argumentative essays. Unpublished MA thesis, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul.
Can, C. (2012). Uluslararası Türk öğrenici İngilizcesi derleminde tutum belirteçleri [Authorial Stance in Turkish International Corpus of Learner English]. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, 1, 39–53.
Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 279-296.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39–71.
Çandarlı, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Martı, L. (2015). Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 192-202.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113.
Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825.
Fu, X., & Hyland, K. (2014). Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse. English Text Construction, 7(1), 122-144.
Heng, C. S., & Tan, H. (2010). Extracting and comparing the intricacies of metadiscourse of two written persuasive corpora. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 6(3), 124-146.
Hinkel, E. (2003). Teaching Academic ESL Writing. New York: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-256.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatic of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437-455.
Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179-197.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151.
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183-205.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177.
Kawase, T. (2015). Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 114-124.
Konca, M. Y., & Nasiri, S. (2014). How to hedge in psychology discipline? A Cross-national study. Journal of American Science, 10(10), 1-5.
Kuhi, D., & Behnam, B. 2011. Generic variations and metadiscourse use in the writing of applied linguists: A comparative study and preliminary framework. Written Communication, 28(1), 97-141.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322.
Letsoela, P. M. (2013). Interacting with readers: Metadiscourse features in national university of Lesotho undergraduate students' academic writing. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(6), 138.
Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150-160.
Rustipa, K. (2014). Metadiscourse in Indonesian EFL learners’ persuasive texts: A case study at English department. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(1), 44-52.
Tan, H., & Eng, W. B. (2014). Metadiscourse use in the persuasive writing of Malaysian undergraduate students. English Language Teaching 7(7), 26-39.
Ting, L., & Wharton, S. (2012). Metadiscourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 345-356.
Uysal, H. H. (2012). Argumentation across L1 and L2 writing: Exploring cultural influences and transfer issues. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 133-159.
Vande Kopple, W.J. (1985). Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93.
Vande Kopple, W.J. (2002). From the dynamic style to the synoptic style in spectroscopic articles in the physical review: Beginnings and 1980. Written Communication, 19(2), 227-264.
Zare-ee, A., & Taghi Farvardin, M. (2009). Comparison of university level EFL learners’ linguistic and rhetorical patterns as reflected in their L1 and L2 writing. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(2), 143-155.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.104
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.