Email this article 
Hide
Show all
An Analysis of Errors Committed by Saudi Non-English Major Students in the English Paragraph Writing: A Study of Comparisons
Abstract
The present study investigates the writing errors of ninety Saudi non-English major undergraduate students of different proficiency levels from three faculties, who studied English as a foundation course at the English Language Center in the College of Languages &Translation at King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia in the academic year 2016-17. The findings reveal that the common errors the Saudi EFL students make in writing English paragraphs fall under four categories namely grammar, lexis, semantics and mechanics. Then it compares the categories, types and frequency of errors committed by these three groups of students. Among these categories, grammar has been observed as the most error-prone area where students commit errors the most. The study also posits that among the three groups, the students of the College of Medicine make the minimum errors in all the types and the highest number of errors is committed by the students of Engineering College. The College of Computer Science is in the second position in making errors. The frequency of error types is also found different among these three groups.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbasi, M., &Karimian, A. (2011). An analysis of grammatical errors among Iranian translation students: A gender-based analysis of Iranian EFL learners' types of written errors Insights from inter-language theory. European Journal of Social Sciences, 25(4), 525-536.
Alhaisoni, M. (2012). An Analysis of Article Errors among Saudi Female EFL Students: A Case Study. Asian Social Science- Canadian Center of Science and Education, 8(12), 55-66. Doi:10.5539/ass.v8n12p55
Almarwany, M. (2008). Writing difficulties of EFL secondary school students in Almunawwarh. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Taibah University, Almunawwarh.
Alsamadani, H. A. (2010). The relationship between Saudi EFL students’ writing competence, L1 writing proficiency, and self-regulation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 53-63.
Ansari, A. A. (2012) Teaching of English to Arab students: Problems and remedies. Educational Research, 3(6), 519-524.
Barry, D. (2014). The impact of native Arabic on English writing as a second language. Clarkston, Michigan: USA.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Carroll, S. and Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15(3), 357-86.
Corder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman.
Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learner's errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161-170.
Fageeh, A.I. (2011). EFL learners’ use of blogging for developing writing skills and enhancing attitudes towards English learning: An exploratory study. Journal of Language and Literature, 2(1), 31-48.
Grami, G. M. A. (2010). The Effects of Integrating Peer Feedback into University-Level ESL Writing Curriculum: A Comparative Study in a Saudi Context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Newcastle University.
Huang, S. J. (2006). A case study of EFL students' writing errors on a web-based writing program. A Paper presented at the International Conference & Workshop on TEFL and Applied Linguistics, Ming Chuan University.
Huwari, I. F. & Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2013). The Reasons behind the Weaknesses of Writing in English among Pre-year Students’ at Taibah University. English for Specific Purposes World, 14(38), 1-9.
Ibrahim F. H. &Fadi M. A. (2012¬).The Reasons behind the Weaknesses of Writing in English among Pre-year Students’ at Taibah University. English for Specific Purposes World, 14(38).
Kharma, N., &Hajjaj, A. (1997). Errors in English among Arabic speakers: analysis and remedy. Beirut: Librairie du Liban Publishers.
Keshavarz, M. H. (1997). Contrastive Analysis and Error Analysis. Tehran, Rahnama Press.
Napitupulu, S. (2017). Analyzing Linguistic Errors in Writing an English Letter: A Case Study of Indonesian Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(3), 71-77.doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20170503.12
Norrish, J. (1987). Language Learning and their Errors. London: Macmillan Publisher Ltd.
Richards, J.C. et al. (1992). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Essex, Longman.
Ridha, N.S. (2012). The effect of EFL learners' mother tongue on their writings in English: An error analysis study. Journal of the College of Arts. University of Basrah, 60, 22-45.
Ruwaida, A. R. (2015). Challenges Face Arab Students in Writing Well-Developed Paragraphs in English. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 49-58.
Sadeghi, K. (2009). Collocational Differences between L1 and L2: Implications for EFL Learners and Teachers. TESL Canada Journal, 26(2), 100-124.
Salem, M. S. A. S. (2007). The effect of journal writing on written performance, writing apprehension, and attitudes of Egyptian English majors (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved April7, 2017 from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/434
Sawalmeh, M.H.M. (2013). Error Analysis of Written English Essays: The case of Students of the Preparatory Year Program in Saudi Arabia. English for Specific Purposes World, 40(14), 1-17.
Tahaineh, Y. (2010): Arab EFL university students' errors in the use of prepositions. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics (MJAL), 2(1), 76–112.
Taiseer (2008).An Analysis of the Common Grammatical Errors in the English Writing made by 3rd Secondary Male Students in the Eastern Coast of the UAE.(Unpublished MA Dissertation). Institute of Education, British University, Dubai, UAE.
Retrieved 20 January, 2014 from https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/bitstream/1234/225/1/20050055.pdf
White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process Writing Harlow: London.
Zamel, V. (1983). The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (2), 165-186.
Zuhour, B. Y. & Fatima, S. A. (2015). Exploring the most common types of writing problems among English language and translation major sophomore female students at Tabuk University. Asian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 7-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.31
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.