The Courageous Ottoman in Goffe's Amurath I (1619)
Abstract
Thomas Goffe favorably represents the image of Sultan Murad I. The presence of the Turkish Sultan serves to highlight the political and cultural significance. The play depicts the disappearance of the cultural, ethnic, and religious boundaries between the Turks and the English. In the tragedy, the Ottoman Amurath loves his wife, Eumorphe. However, his Machiavellian tutor Lala Schahin persuades Amurath to murder her and depart to martial invasions. The legend Eumorphe is a symbol of Ottoman despotism in Europe. The play points on Amurath’s mortal stand and his atrocities towards Christians which is punished by the Serbian assignation. The show accomplishes with the first Battle of Kosovo, in which Amurath is successful but is slain by the Serbian protagonist Cobelitz. According to the Ottoman tradition, his elder son Bajazet gets to the top but then he is enforced to slay his younger brother to avoid his rivalry for the authority.
Keywords: Goffe, Turk, Ottoman, Murad I/Amurath I, Eumorphe, Mahomet, Cobelitz
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Olaqi, F. (2013). The Oriental Other Soliman the Magnificent in Kyd's Soliman and Perseda. TRAMES, 2013, 17(66/61), 2, pp.177–201. DOI: 10.3176/tr.2013.1.02.
Agoston, G. (2005). 'Behind the Turkish War Machine: Gunpowder Technology and War Industry in the Ottoman Empire, 1450–1700,' in: Brett D. Steele et al. (eds.): The Heirs of Archimedes: Science and the Art of War through the Age of Enlightenment, Cambridge et al. 2005, pp. 102–133.
Anderson, Perry (1974). Lineages of the Absolutist State. London, N.L.B.
Belgasem, F. (2013). 'Representations of Ottoman Sultans in Elizabethan Times,' Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7384/
Bartels, E.C. (1992) ‘The Double Vision of the East: Imperialist Self-Construction in Marlowe’s Tamburlaine, Part One’, Renaissance Drama 23 (1992).
Bowers, F. ed. (1987). Dictionary of Literary Biography, Volume 58: Jacobean and Caroline Dramatists. University of Virginia. Gale.
Boxer, Ch. (1985). Anglo-Portuguese Rivalry in the Persian Gulf, 1615–1635, in Boxer, Portuguese Conquest and Commerce in Southern Asia 1500–1750. London, Variorum.
Bisaha, N. (2004).Creating East and West: Renaissance Humanists and the Ottoman Turks. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
Burton, J. (2000).Anglo-Ottoman Relations and the Image of the Turk in Tamburlaine. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 30(1), 130-131.
Burton, J. (2005). Traffic and Turning: Islam and English Drama, 1579-1624, (Cranbury, NJ: Rosemont Publishing.
Casale, G. (2010). The Ottoman age of Exploration. Oxford, University Press.
Chew, S. C. (1965). The Crescent and the Rose. New York, Oxford.
Gainsford, Th. (1618).The Glory of England. London, Edward Griffin
Gurkan, E.S. (2010). 'Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire, in European History Online (EGO),' the Institute of European History (IEG), Mainz 2010-12-03. URL: http://www.ieg-ego.eu/gurkane-2010-en.
Goffman, Daniel. (2004). The Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, UP.
Harper, J. G. (2011). The Turk and Islam in the Western Eye, 1450-1750. Ashgate Publishing, Limited
Inalcık, H. (2006). “Murad I”, DİA, İstanbul: Turkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 2006.156-164.
Imber, C. (2002). The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Khan, F.W. (2011). 'Mirrors of Governance: ‘The Mighty Turkish Diadem and English Drama (Selimus. Sc.xxvi.2340)' Journal of European Studies, 26(2), 139-169.
Knolles, R. (1610).The Generall Historie of the Turkes (London, 1610, first published 1603).
Lewis, B. (ed. and trans.), (1987). Islam from the Prophet Muhammad to the capture of Constantinople, Vol. I: Politics and War. Oxford, UP.
Najemy, J. M. (2009). MACHIAVELLI BETWEEN EAST AND WEST From Florence to the Mediterranean and Beyond.Essays in Honour of Anthony Molho, edited by Diogo Ramada Curto, Eric R Dursteler, Julius Kirshner and Francesca Trivellato. Firenze, pp. 127-145.
Matar, N. ( 1998). Islam in Britain, 1558-1685. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matar, N. (1999). Turks, Moors, and Englishmen in the Age of Discovery. Columbia University Press, New York.
McJannet, L. (2006). The Sultan Speaks: Dialogue in English Plays and Histories about the Ottoman Turks. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
O'Malley, Susan Gushee. ed. (1979). Thomas Goffe, The Courageous Turk. New York, Garland.
Pasini, J. (2011). "Kin with Kin and Kind with Kind Confound": Pity, Justice, and Family Killing in Early Modern Dramas Depicting Islam. Unpublished PhD. Thesis. Rice University, Houston, Texas.
Sandys, G. (1610) A Relation of a Journey. London, Barrett.
Schwoebel, Robert. (1967). The Shadow of the Crescent: Renaissance Image of the Turks 1453-1517. Nieuwwkoop: B. de Graaf.
Senlen, S. (2010). “A[u]gmenter of Their Kingdome”: Goffe’s The Couragious Turke , or, Amurath the First as a Christian Tragedy based on Knolles’ The Generall Historie of the Turkes, (OTAM, 28 /Güz 2010) pp. 49-63.
Skilliter, S. A. (1977). William Harborne and the Trade with Turkey, 1578–1582: A Documentary Study of the First Anglo-Ottoman Relations. London, Oxford University Press.
Slotkin, J.E. (2008). Now will I be a Turke': Performing Ottoman Identity in Thomas Goffe's The Courageous Turk'. Early Theatre, 12(2), 222-35.
Southern, R.W. (1978). The Western Views of Islam in the Medieval Ages. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Valensi, L. (1993). The Birth of the Despot: Venice and the Sublime Porte, trans. A. Denner, Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University Press.
Vitkus, Daniel J., (1997).Turning Turk in Othello: The Conversion and Damnation of the Moor. Shakespeare Quarterly, 48(2),145–76.
Vitkus, Daniel J. (2000). Introduction. Three Turk Plays from Early Modern England. New York, Columbia UP.
Vitkus, Daniel J. (2003).Turning Turk: English Theater and the Multicultural Mediterranean, 1570–1630. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Wann, Louis. (1915). The Oriental in Elizabethan Drama. Modern Philology, 12(7), 423-447.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.