Email this article 
Hide
Show all
The Effect of Context on Iranian EFL Students’ Amount of Speech Production of English Language and Their Ways of Using Hedging Devices
Abstract
Socioculturally and sociolinguisticlly, gender can have a profound effect on learning and teaching English language as a foreign language. Also learning cooperatively in which both female and male students are involved seems to play a constructive role in creating and enhancing students’ performance, achievement and competence of a foreign language. This study intends to determine whether male or female students will be more productive and active when co-educationally discussing the same topic together in a mixed-sex context as a bi-gender speech community regarding English as a foreign language or when either male or female students participate in the discussion as a mono-gender speech community. This study also aims at determining whether students of different gender would use different hedging devices and strategies in different contexts or there is no difference regarding the types and amount of hedging uttered by male and female students in three different contexts. One topic familiar to both groups about which both have some background knowledge will be given to all eight participants consisting of 4 male and 4 female students. The whole utterances during the discussion will be taped and video-recorded, and then it will be analyzed. The findings may provide us with some significant implications both for gaining higher production performance ability and higher linguistic competence of English as a foreign language which can be of use in both English teaching and learning processes.
Keywords: Co-education, Gender, mixed-sex context, Sociolinguistics, Speech community
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Mously, N., Salem, R. and Al-Hamdan, N., (2013). The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education. J Contemp Med Edu, 1(3), 170-176
Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P.D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 311-341.
Barton, A. (1998). Unlikely linguists? Raising achievement in modern languages in all-boy teaching groups. The Linguist 37, 80-83.
Brutsaert, H. (2001). Co-educatie. Studiekansen en kwaliteit van het schoolleven. Garant, Leuven and Apeldoorn.
Brutsaert, H. Van Houtte, M., (2002). Girls’ and boys’ sense of belonging in single-sex versus coeducational schools. Research Education 68, 48-56.
Burgess, A. (1990). Co-education: the disadvantages for school girls. Gender and Education 2, 91-5.
Povedo, P. C. (2007). A contrastive analysis of hedging in English and Spanish architecture project descriptions. RESLA 2. (2007), 139-158.
Chambers, G., (2005). Teaching modern foreign languages in single-sex classes in a coeducational context – review of a project in a North Yorkshire comprehensive school. Language Learning Journal 32, 45-54.
Cheng, Y., Payne, J., Witherspoon, S., (1995). Science and Mathematics in full-time education after 16. Youth Cohort Report No. 36. Department for Education and Employment, London.
Coates, J. (1998). Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Coates, J. (2004). Women, Men and Language (3rd edn), London: Longman.
Crawford, M. (1995). Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage Publications.
Eckert, P. and S. McConnell-Ginet (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, R. C. (1996). Motivation and second language acquisition: Perspectives. Journal of the CAAL, 18, 19–42.
Gass, S., Varonis, E., (1986). Sex differences in non-native speaker-non-native speaker interactions, in: Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to Learn. Newbury House, Rowley, Mass, pp. 327- 52.
Graddol, D.,and Swann, J. (1989). Gender Voices. Oxford: Blackwell.
Halpern. D. F. (2006). Assessing gender gaps in learning and academic achievement. In Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd Edition), P.A. Alexander and P.H.
Haas, A., (1979). Male and Female Spoken Language Differences: Stereotypes and Evidence. Psychological Bulletin: State University of New York College at New Paltz, 86(3), 615-626.
Haw, K. F., (1994). Muslim girls' schools: a conflict of interests? Gender and Education 6, 63 -76.
Holm, J. (1989). Pidgins and Creoles, vol. 2: Reference Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, J. (1992). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
Hyland, Ken (1994). “Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks”, in English for Specific Purposes, 13, 239-256
Kramer, C. (1974). Wishy-washy Mommy Talk. Psychology Today, 8(1): 82–5.
Kieu Van, L.T., (2000). The Impact of gender on language learning. Vietnam: Ho Chi Min City University of Education press.
Lakoff, G. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Lakoff, G. (1972). “Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts”. Papers from the English Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society Papers, 8, 183-228.
Llamas, C., Mullany, L. and Stockwell, P. (2007). The Routledge companion to sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge publication.
MacIntyre, P. D., Charos, C., (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15, 3–26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Cle´ment, R., Do¨rnyei, Z., Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 82, 545–562.
McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P. (1982). Communication apprehension and shyness: Conceptual and operational distinctions. Central States Speech Journal 33, 458–468.
McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal 56, 72–77.
McCroskey, J. C., 1992. Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly 40, 16–25.
Mesthrie, R., Swann, J., Deumert, A. and William L. L. (2000). Introducing sociolinguistics. Second edition, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Miller, P., Dale, R.R. (1974). A comparison of the degree results of university students from coeducational and single-sex schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 44, 307-308.
Oslar, A., Hussain, L. (1995). Parental choice and schooling: some factors influencing muslim mothers' decisions about the education of their daughters. Cambridge Journal of Education 25, 327-47.
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11, 63-90.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. (1992). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Tenth impression. (1st edition 1985.) London and New York: Longman.
Robinson, P., Smithers, A. (1999). Should the sexes be separated for secondary education: comparisons of single‐sex and co‐educational schools?. Research Papers in Education 14, 23-49.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Open Books, London.
Sax, L., J., Arms, E., Woodruff, M., Riggers, T., Eagan, K. (2009). Women Graduates of Single-Sex and Coeducational High Schools: Differences in their Characteristics and the Transition to College. Sudikoff Family Institute for Education & New Media, Los Angeles.
Shaikh, S., Kelly, A. (1989). To mix or not to mix: Pakistani girls in British schools. Educational Research 31, 10-25.
Shehadeh, A. (1999). Gender differences and equal opportunities in the ESL classroom. ELT Journal 53, 256-261.
Taheryan, A. and Ghonsooly, B. (2014). The Role of Single-sex and Mixed-sex Context on Iranian Students' Willingness to Communicate. International Journal of English and Education, 3(1).
Wardhaugh, R. (1986). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New york: Blackwell Publishing.
Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.
Woodward, L. J., Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., (1999). The effects of single-sex and coeducational secondary schooling on children’s academic achievement. Australian Journal of Education 43, 142-156.
Zakahi, W. R., & McCroskey, J. M. (1989). Willingness to communicate: A potential confounding variable in communication research. Communication Reports 2, 96-109.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.