The Effect of Virtual Language Learning Method on Writing Ability of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
Abstract
This study aimed at investigating the effect of virtual language learning method on Iranian intermediate EFL learners writing ability. The study was conducted with 20 English Translation students at Chabahar Maritime University who were assigned into two groups, control and experimental, after ensuring of their homogeneity by administering a TOEFL proficiency. The participants of the experimental group received virtual learning i.e. sending PowerPoint through their e-mails. The participants of the experimental group did not have to attend the classes, however they had to study the PowerPoint and send the assigned task on the mentioned deadline. A writing posttest was administered to find the impacts of both methods. A paired sample t-test and an independent sample t-test were run to analyze the posttest scores using SPSS. The findings of the study indicated that both groups showed some improvements in terms of their writing ability since the obtained p value of both groups were 0.000 which is smaller than 0.05. However using virtual method appeared to be a more fruitful tool since the mean score of the experimental group (12.75) was much higher than the mean score of the control group (9.8).
Keywords: writing ability; virtual learning; product approach; process approach; virtual environment
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ababneh, & Lababneh. (2013). The Effect of Using the Internet on EFL Elementary School Students’ Writing. Journal of Education and Practice. 4 (12).
Al-Jamal, & O'beidat. (2004). The Effect of Computer Chatting on Developing Tenth Graders’ Reading and Writing Skills . Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences. 12 (2) .
Al-Menei, A. M. (2008). An Investigation of the Effect of Computer-assisted Writing Instruction on EFL Saudi Learners’ Ability. Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: King Saud University.
Arndt, A. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. English Language Teaching Journal , 41 (1), 257-67.
Avent, & Harmon, J. (1994). A study of language learning achievement differences between students using the traditional language laboratory and students using computer-assisted language learning courseware. Dissertation Abstract International .
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A Process Genre approach to teaching Writing. ELT Journal , 2 (54), 153-160.
Braine, 1. (1997). Beyond word processing:Networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computer and Composition , 14 (1), 45-58.
Brakus, J. J., Bernd, S. H., & Zhang, S. (2008). Experiential Attributes and Consumer Judgments. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Bransford, Brown, & Cocking. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Brown, K. M. (1996). The Role of Internal and External Factors in Discontinuation of Off-Campus Students. Distance Education , 17 (1), 44-71.
Curran, K., & McCarroll, N. (2013). Social Networking in Education. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy, 4 (1).
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing Second - Language Skills: Theory to Practice. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing Second Language Skills. San Diego: Harcourt College.
Chen, J. (1996). Computer generated error feedback and writing process. TESL-EJ,2,3.
Chiu, Tsuo-lin, Hsien-chin, yeh, & Yuli. (2007). A study of web-based oral activities enhanced by automatic speech recognition for EFL college learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 20 (3), 209-233.
Chou, T.-W. (2007). The Effects of the WebQuest Writing Instruction Program on EFL Learners' Writing Performance, Writing Apprehension, and Perception. TESL-EJ, 11 (3).
Christakis, D., Meltzoff, & Zimmerman. (2007). Associations between Media Viewing and Language Development in Children Under Age 2 Years. Journal of Pediatrics 12 (4), 364-368.
Christensen, C. (2009, April 20). Blended Learning Infographic. Retrieved from KNEWTON: http://www.knewton.com/blended-learning/
Clark, & Ivanic. (1997). Writing Processes and Practices. London: Routledge.
Cook, J. (1985). Effects of computer-assisted instruction upon seventh grade students’ growth in writing performance. Nebraska, USA: Nebraska State University.
Dastjerdi, V., & Samian, S. H. (2011). Quality of Iranian EFL Learners' Argumentative Essays: Cohesive devices in focus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 14 (4).
Davoudi, L., Gorjian, B., & Pazhakh, A. (2013). The Role of Post-task Call Approach in Teaching Writing Accuracy among Advanced EFL Learners.. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World , 4 (4).
Diecker, L., Lane, Allsopp, O'Brie, Kyg, & Butler. (2009). Evaluating Video Models of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices to Enhance Teacher Learning. Teacher Education and Special Education , 32 (2), 180-196.
Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., & Synteta, P. (2001). Virtual Learning Environments. Information & Communication Technologies in Education , 12 (4), 3-18.
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). ‘Information-gap' tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly , 20 (2), 305-326.
Esmaili, S. (2012). EFL Writing and Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Towards an Eclectic View and Far Beyond That. Iran: A master's thesis.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistic Using SPSS. Sage Publications Limited .
Fletcher, J., & Atkinson, R. (1972). Evaluation of the Stanford CAI programm in initial reading. Journal of Educational Psychology , 63 (6), 597-602.
Ghahari, & Ameri-Golestan. (2013). The Effect of Blended Learning vs. Classroom Learning Techniques on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing . International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research , 1 (3).
Goldberg, Russell, & Cook. (2003). The Effect of Computers on Student Writing:- A Meta-Analysis of Studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment , 2 (1).
Gooran, M., & Hayati, M. (2014). Email and its Effects on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. MEXTESOL Journal, 4 (12).
Gousseva, J. (1998). Crossing Cultural and Spatial Boundaries: A Cyber composition Experience . The Internet TESL Journal , 4 (11).
Gunning, T. (1998). Assessing and Correcting Reading and Writing Difficulties. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. (2008). Opening up education: the collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Cambridge: Mass: MIT Press.
Hamp, L., & Heasley, B. (2006). A Course in Written English for Academic Purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students Distress with a Web-Based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences. Information,Communication and Society, 3 (4), 557-579.
Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormouth, D., Hartfiel, V., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing ESl Compostion: A Practical Approach. Rowely: Newbury House.
Jordan, R. (1999). Academic Writing Course (3rd Edition ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kashefian-Naeeini, S., & Mousavi, H. (2011). Academic Writing Problems of Iranian Post-Graduate Students at National University of Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences , 4 (23), 593-603.
Khajavi, Y., & Abbasian, R. (2011). English Language Teaching, National Identity and Globalization in Iran: the Case of Public Schools. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, I 5 (10).
Langan, J. (1987). College Writing Skills. New York: McGraw Hill.
Maki, R., Maki, W., Patterson, M., & Whittaker, P. (2000). Evaluation of a Web-Based Introductory Psychology Course: Learning ans Satisfaction in On-line Versus Lecture Course. Behavior Research Methods, Insstruments, and Computers , 32 (2), 230-239.
Maltby, A., & Mackie, S. (2008). Virtual learning environments – help or hindrance for the ‘disengaged’ student? ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology , 17 (1), 49-62.
Mastuda, P. (2003). Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History. Journal of Second Language, 12 (4), 5-83.
McKenzie, T., McRae, H., & Toia, R. (2010). ICT Tools Supporting Teacher Practice in Language Acquisition. Ubiquitous Learning .
Moursund, D. (1988). Education Would Be Better If... Learning and Leading with Technology.
Murray, K., & Waller, R. (2007). Social Networking Goes Abroad. Education Abroad 16 , 16 (1), 56-59.
Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: the writing process and error analysis in student texts. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language , 6 (2), 1-19.
Nezam Hashemi, F. (2014). The Effect of Virtual vs. Actual Writing Instruction on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Essay Writing Performance in Islamic Azad University, Dubai Branch. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature , 2 (1), 1-12.
Niazi, F., & Pourgharib, B. (2013). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences , 4 (11), 331-339.
Oduol, S. (2012). Innovative applicat ions of Typography. Ancient African Typographic Symbols in Contemporary Publication Design, 12 (3), 2-10.
Parker, S. (1993). The Craft of Writing. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Pilgrim, J., & Bledsoe, C. (2011). Learning Through Facebook: A Potential Tool for Educators. Delta Kappa Gamma .
Pincas, A. (1982). Writing in Eblish 1. London: Macmillan.
Phillips, D. (2004). Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test: The Paper Test. New York: Pearson ESL.
Purceel, Buchnan, & Friedrich. (2013). The Impact of Digital Tools on Student Writing and How Writing is Taught in Schools. National writing project .
Queen. (2009, January 11). www.encyclopediadramatica.se. Retrieved April 03, 2013, from https://forum.encyclopediadramatica.se/threads/completely-random-thread.13025/page-9
Russell, T. (1999). The No Significance Difference Phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Press.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in Teaching Writng. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reeves, T. (1998). The Impact of Media and T echnology in Schools. Georhia: The Bertelsmann Foundation.
Richards, C. (1990). The Lanaguage Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: an Anthology of Curent Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, & Ritzko. (2009). Pdcasts in Education: What, Why and How? Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership , 14 (1), 38-45.
Sattar, & Naharkhalaji. (2013). The Role of E-mail Activities in EFL Writing Classes.
Schlager, M., fusco, J., & Schank, P. (1999). Evolution of an On-line Education Community of Practice. Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace .
Susan, G. (2002). Theological Education on the Web: A Case Study in Formation for Ministry. Teaching Theology an Religion , 5 (4), 227-235.
Tremblay, E. (2010). Educating the Mobile Generation – Using Personal Cell Phones as Audience Response Systems in Post-Secondary Science Teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching , 29 (2), 217-227.
Tushyeh , & Farrah. (2010). Enhancing the English Reading and Writing Skills of Palestinian English Majors by Using CALL. Hebron University Research Journal , 5 (2), 259-282.
Williams, J. (1989). Preparing to Teach Writing. California: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
White, S. (1994). The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Prewriting on the Prewriting on the Persuasive Writing of Tenth Grade Students. TX:University of Houston, MAI , 33 (04), 296- 315.
Wu, P., Kuo, C., Wu, P., & Wu, T. H., T. (2006). Design a competence -based networked learning system: using sequence control as example (1st Edition ed.). (A. Méndez-Vilas, A. Solano Martín, & M. Gonzá, Eds.) Badajoz, Spain: FORMATEX.
Yang, N. (2004). Using My Access in EFL Writing. The Proceedings of 2004 International Conference and Workshop on EFL and Applied Linguistics (pp. 550-564). Taipei: Ming Chuann University.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.