Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Language Choice and Use of Malaysian Public University Lecturers in the Education Domain
Abstract
It is a norm for people from a multilingual and multicultural country such as Malaysia to speak at least two or more languages. Thus, the Malaysian multilingual situation resulted in speakers having to make decisions about which languages are to be used for different purposes in different domains. In order to explain the phenomenon of language choice, Fishman domain analysis (1964) was adapted into this research. According to Fishman’s domain analysis, language choice and use may depend on the speaker’s experiences situated in different settings, different language repertoires that are available to the speaker, different interlocutors and different topics. Such situations inevitably cause barriers and difficulties to those professionals who work in the education domain. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explore the language choice and use of Malaysian public university lecturers in the education domain and to investigate whether any significant differences exist between ethnicity and field of study with the English language choice and use of the lecturers. 200 survey questionnaires were distributed to examine the details of the lecturers’ language choice and use. The findings of this research reveal that all of the respondents generally preferred to choose and use English language in both formal and informal education domain. Besides, all of the respondents claimed that they chose and used more than one language. It is also found that ethnicity and field of study of the respondents influence the language choice and use in the education domain. In addition, this research suggested that the language and educational policy makers have been largely successful in raising the role and status of the English language as the medium of instruction in tertiary education while maintaining the Malay language as having an important role in the communicative acts, thus characterizing the lecturers’ language choice and use.
Keywords: Language choice and use; lecturers; Malaysian public university, education domain; domain analysis
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, A. R. (2013). Language Choice and Use of Malaysian Tamil Christian Youths: A Survey. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 149-166.
Adams, Y., Matu, P. M., & Ongarora, D. O. (2012). Language Use and Choice: A Case Study of Kinubi in Kibera, Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 99-104.
Awal, N. M., Jaafar, M. F., Mis, M. A., & Lateh, H. (2014). Maintenance of Mother Tongue: Patterns of Language Choice at the Malaysian-Thai Border. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 282 – 287). Elsevier Lt.
Bond, M., Harris, J., Maslanka, I., Pickering, H., & Turkoglu, D. P. (2011). Language Choice of the Polish Community in Manchester. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2009). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS 14,15 and 16. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (2004). The Nature of Quantitative Research. In A. Bryman, Social Research Methods: Second Edition (pp. 61-82). New York: Oxford University Press.
Burhanudeen, H. (2006). Language and Social Behaviour. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Chaudhry, S., Khan, M., & Mahay, A. (2010). A Multilingual Family's Linguistic Profile in Manchester: A Domain Analysis of English, Urdu and Punjabi. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Dealwis, C. (2010). Language Choices of Dayak Bidayuh Undergraduates in the Friendship Domain. Borneo Research Journal, 209-220.
Ethnologue Languages of the World. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.ethnologue.com/showcountry.asp?name=MY
Fishman, J. A. (1989). Utilizing Societal Variables to Predict Whether Countries are Linguistically Homogeneous or Heterogeneous. In J. A. Fishman, Language and Ethnicity in Minority Sociolinguistics Perspectives (pp. 580–601). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Fishman, J. A. (1972). Domains and the Relationship between Micro- and Macro-sociolinguistics. In J. J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes, Directions in Sociolinguistics: the Ethnography of Communication (pp. 435-453). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fishman, J. A. (1972). The Sociology of Language: An Interdisciplinary Social Science Approach to Language in Society. Newbury: Rowley.
Fishman, J. A. (1970). A Brief Introduction. Newbury House Publishers.
Fishman, J. A. (1967). Bilingualism With and Without Diglossia; Diglossia With and Without Bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 74-75.
Fishman, J. A. (1965). Who Speaks What Language to Whom and When? La Linguistique, 67-88.
Fishman, J. A. (1964). Language Maintenance and Language Shift as a Field of Inquiry. Linguistics , 32-70.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Leo, A. R., & Abdullah, A. N. (2013). Language Choice and Use of Malaysian Tamil Christian Youths: A Survey. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 149-166.
Mostafizar Rahman, A. R., Chan, S. H., & Nadzimah, A. (2007). Patterns of language choice in the education domain: The Malaysian context. In The Second Biennial International Conference on Teaching and Learning of English in Asia : Exploring New Frontiers (TELiA2) (pp. 1-15).
Namei, S. (2008). Language Choice Among Iranians in Sweden. Journal of Multilingual and Multicutural Development, 419-437.
Nancy, H. (2011). Linguistic Choices in Multilingual Spheres: The Case of the University of Ghana Male Studies.
Omar, A. H. (1993). Language and Society in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Ting, S.-H., & Ling, T.-Y. (2013). Language Use and Sustainability Status of Indigenous Languages in Sarawak, Malaysia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 77-93.
UNESCO. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/Language_vitality_and_endangerment_EN.pdf
Yeh, H.-n., Chan, H.-c., & Cheng, Y.-s. (2004). Language Use in Taiwan: Language Proficiency and Domain Analysis. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities and Social Sciences, 75-108.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.