Anchoring Effects of English Vocabulary Instruction: The Case of Pre-University Students

Anahita Deylamsalehi, Hamed Barjasteh, Reza Vaseghi

Abstract


The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of employing Concept Mapping (hereafter CM) in vocabulary instruction on Iranian pre-university students. This study also seeks to find whether there is difference between male and female students’ vocabulary learning when they are subjected to CM instruction. In so doing, an Oxford Placement Test was administered among 120 pre-university students in two high schools in Iran.  Eighty    students who scored between +1 and -1 standard deviation above and below the mean were selected and randomly assigned into concept mapping group (CM) and non-concept mapping group (NCM) (20 male and 20 female). The results indicated that the CM group outperformed the NCM group in vocabulary learning. It was also revealed that there was no significant difference between males and females. Some pedagogical implications in the EFL context are discussed in the subsequent section.

Keywords: vocabulary instruction, pre-university students, concept mapping  


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahlberg, M., & Ahoranta, V. (2004). What do concept maps reveal about pupil’s learning and thinking? Paper presented at the Annual conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada

Allen, F.V. (1983). Techniques in vocabulary. NY: Oxford University Press.

Abayomi, B. f. (1988). The effects of concept mapping and cognitive style on science achievement. Dissertation Abstract International, 45(6), 1420-A.

Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational Psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.

Bello, G., & Abimbola, I. O. (1997). Gender influence on biology students’ concept-mapping ability and achievement in evolution. Journal of Science Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 8-17.

Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (1986). Making connections: Alternatives to the vocabulary notebook. Journal of Reading, 29, 643–649.

Blachowicz, C. L. Z. & Fisher, P. 2000. Vocabulary instruction. In Barr, R., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. S. and Kamil, M. (Eds.). Handbook of Reading Research, Volume3. White.

Barcroft, J., Schmitt, N., & Sunderman, G. (2011). Lexis. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 571-583). Abingdon, UK / New York: Routledge

Boujaoude, S., & Attieh, M. (2003). The effect of using concept maps as a study tool on achievement in Chemistry. In paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in science Teaching, Philadelphia.

Carrell, P., Pharis, B., & Liberto, J. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading.TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.

Cicognani, A. (2000). Concept mapping as a collaborative tool for enhanced Online learning. Educational Technology & society,3,150-158.

Dolehanty, C. (2008). Concept mapping and reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://www.doc- txt.com/Concept-Map-Maker.pdf

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. OUP.

Fahim , M., & Amjadiparvar , A. (2012). An investigation of the effect of concept mapping on improving Iranian EFL learners‘ listening comprehension ability. Journal of American Science, 8 (6)

Fahim, M., & Heidari, F. (2006). The impact of map training as a post- listening strategy on EFL learners' listening comprehension. Zaban- va-Adab, 24, 106-122.

Fromkin, V., and Rodman, R. (1974)..An Introduction to Language. U.S.A., Rinehard and Winston, Inc.

Ghanizadeh, A. (2007). On validation of concept map as an assessment tool of L2 reading comprehension: a triangulation approach. Unpublished MA thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

Godwin-jones, R. (2010). Emerging technologies from memory places to spaces algorithems : Approches to second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology , 4.

Ghonsooly ,B., & Hosienpour, A. (2009) .The effect of concept mapping on EFL speaking fluency. IJAL, 12(1).

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (1997). Content-based instruction: Research foundations. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The contentbased classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. New York: Longman.

Iwai, Y. (2007). Developing ESL/EFL learners’ reading comprehension of expository texts. The Internet TESL Journal,13(7).

Joshi R. (2005) Vocabulary: A Critical Component of Comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 21, 209-219.

Kame’enui, E. J.,& Baumann, J. F. (2012). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press

Kaur, N.(2012). Effect of concept mapping on achievement in mathematics of secondary school students in relation to their intelligence. International Journal Of Research In Education Methodology Council For Innovative Research Vol. 1, No.3

Keshavarz,M. H., Ati, M. R, & Mohammadi, S.M.(2006).The effect of semantic mapping strategy instruction on vocabulary learning of intermediate EFL students. The journal of faculty of letters and humanities No.198

Larsen-Freeman, D. E., & Long, M. H. (1991). An Introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.

Liu, D. O. N. G. Y. U. E. (2004). EFL proficiency, gender and language learning strategy use among a group of Chinese technological institute English majors.ARECLS e-Journal, 1(5).

Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students' English reading comprehension. Computer & Education, 54, 436- 445.

McCarville, K.B .(2000). Keyword mnemonic and vocabulary acquisition for developmental college students. Journal of Developmental Education, 16 (2000), pp. 2–4

Nation, I. S. P., & Meara, P. (2002). Vocabulary. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 35–54). London: Arnold

Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.

Neuman, S. B., Newman, E. H., & Dwyer, J. (2011). Educational effects of a vocabulary intervention on preschoolers' word knowledge and conceptual development: A cluster- randomized trial. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 249-272.

Novak, J.D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps: A tool for students and teachers alike. The Science Teacher 58(7), 45-49.

Novak, J. D. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167-193

Novak, J.D., & Cañas, A.J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical support IHMC Cmap tools 2006-1 Rev01-2008, Florida institute for human and machine cognition. Retrieved October 5, 2009 from http://www.cmaps.ihmc.us/publications/research

Novak, J.D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept Maps(tm) as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oakley, L. (2004). Cognitive Development. London: Routledge, East Sussex.

Poole, A. (2005). Gender differences in reading strategy use among ESL college students. Journal of college Reading and Learning, 36(1), 7-20.Richards, J.C. (1976). The Role of Vocabulary Teaching. TESOL Quarterly (10) 1. (pp. 77-89).

Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41 - 51.

Sanaoui, R. (1996). Processes of vocabulary instruction in 10 French as a second language classrooms. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (2), 179-199.

Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Doyle, B., Mitchell, M. A., & Meyer, A. G. (2014). Teachers' instruction and students' vocabulary and comprehension: An exploratory study with English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual students in Grades 3–5. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 31-60.

Stahl, S., & Vancil, S. (1986). Discussion is what makes semantic maps work in vocabulary instruction. Reading Teacher,40, 62–69.

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406

Stern H.H. (1975). What can we learn from the Good Language Learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 4, pp.304-318.

Swain, M. (1996). Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research prospectives. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (4), 529-548.

Swan , M.., & Walter, C. (1984). The Cambridge English Course 1 (teacher’s book). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. E. Arnold.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.