Quality Research in Higher Education Institutions in Oman: Some Views of Teacher Researchers

Ahmed Ali Saleh Al Ajmi, Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali

Abstract


Academic research remains a prime source of knowledge and innovation for higher education institutions (HEIs) that strive to grow, expand and develop their academic reputations and standards. Yet, research informs teaching practices, shapes social changes and it has financial outcomes for HEIs. Therefore, it is imperative to develop institutional policies and strategies for promoting and sustaining quality research in HEIs in Oman. There are a number of international frameworks and models which have been developed to measure research quality in HEIs around the world. For example, bibliometrics were used to assess research quality in HEIs in the UK because bibliometric data can provide a number of component variables. An appropriate bibliometric model may include components such as output volume, diversity of outputs, citation volume, journal impact factor and average citations per publication, etc. Moreover, other popular examples of models for assessing research quality are Multidimensional Research Assessment Matrix (MRAM) used in Europe and the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). However, neither of the above mentioned models is adopted by HEIs in Oman. Thus, the current study is an attempt to explore some institutional, international, logistic and pragmatic factors that impact academic research and publication quality, review popular international research quality assessment models and explore the possibility of applying them in the Omani context. To achieve the study objectives, 20 teacher researchers were surveyed and the findings and recommendations were presented.

Keywords: Quality Research, HEIs in Oman, International Models, Factors, Teacher Researchers' Views


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, J. (2009). The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions. Research Quality in Higher Education Institutions, 57, 19-32. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0003-3

Brennan, J., & Teichler, U. (2008). The future of higher education and of higher education research. Higher Education, 56, 529-264. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9124-6

Cabral, A., & Huet, I. (2014). Assessment of research quality in higher education: contribution for an institutional framework. Procedia- Social Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1528-1532. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.429

Chang, D., Nyeu, F., & Chang, H. (2014). Balancing quality and quantity to build research universities in Taiwan. Higher Education. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9841-y

Chou, C. (2008). The impact of neo-liberalism on Taiwanese higher education. The Worldwide Transformation of Higher Education International Perspectives on Education and Society, 9, 297-311.

Furlong, J. & Oancea, A. (2005). Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research: a framework for discussion. Oxford University Department of Educational Studies.

Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004507

Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2008). Research Assessment Exercise 2008: the outcome. Bristol: HEFCE.

Haustein, S., & Lariviere, V. (2015). The use of bibliometrics for assessing research: possibilities, limitations and adverse effect. In. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, & M. Osterloh (Eds.), Incentives and Performance (pp. 121-1391). Springer International Publishing.

Mahmood, S. (2011). Factors affecting the quality of research in education: students’ perceptions. Journal of Education and Practice, 2, 34-40.

Mok, K. H., & Wang, L. (2008). University governance reforms in China and Taiwan: Academic reflections. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association (APERA) Conference 2008, Nov. 26-28, NIE, Singapore.

Open Research Grant (ORG) Guidelines Manual. (2014). The Research Council, Sultanate of Oman.

Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62, 117-131. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7

Wu, C. (2008). A critical review of challenges and opportunities for universities in Taiwan. In. A Strategic Network Promoting University Excellence (Ed.), mission and vision: development plan for world class universities and research centers of excellence. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2010-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

Advances in Language and Literary Studies

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.