The Effect of Gradual Increase in Contextual Interference on Acquisition, Retention and Transfer of Volleyball Skills

Fatemeh Pasand, Heydar Fooladiyanzadeh, Gholamhossien Nazemzadegan

Abstract


Background: A general viewpoint on contextual interference shows that a blocked practice schedule facilitates the acquisition of a skill while a random practice is more useful in the retention and transfer of that skill. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of gradual increase in contextual interference upon acquisition, retention and transfer of volleyball skills. Methods: For this purpose, 45 participants were randomly selected from male students at Shiraz University-Iran. After pre-test, the participants were equally distributed in three experimental groups: blocked (low CI), random (high CI) and percentile gradual increase. After nine training sessions and recording the scores, the students were tested for acquisition, retention and transfer. p≤0.05 was considered as significance level in all the tests. Results: There was significant difference between the groups in acquisition sessions in favor of the blocked group. Retention and transfer test results also showed a significant difference between the groups in favor of random training and gradual increase groups compared to blocked training group .However no significant difference was observed between random with gradual increase training groups. Conclusion: According to the findings of this research, it can be concluded that random and gradual increase in contextual interference training methods may increase the performance of subjects in terms of volleyball skills in retention and transfer tests.

Keywords: Gradual Increase of Contextual Interference, Blocked, Random, Volleyball, Acquisition, Retention, Transfer


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afsanepurak, S. A., Karimiyani, N., Moradi, J., & Safaei, M. (2012). The Effect of Blocked, Random, and Systematically Increasing Practice on learning of Different Types of Basketball Passes. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2(6), 2397-2402.

Antonius, K., Travlos. (2010) (1). “Specificity and variability of practice, and contextual interference in acquisition and transfer of an underhand volleyball serve”. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Vol. 110, Issue, pp: 298-312.

Bortoli, L., Robazza, C., Durigon, V., & Carra, C. (1992). Effects of contextual interference on learning technical sports skills. Perceptual and motor skills, 75(2), 555-562.

Chamberlin, C., Rimer, T., & Skaggs, D. (1990). The ecological validity of the contextual interference effect: A practical application to learning the jump shot in basketball. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity. Houston, TX, May.

Dias, G., & Mendes, R. (2010). Effects of a contextual interference continuum on golf putting task. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, 24(4), 545-553.

Feghhi, I., Valizadeh, R., Rahimpour, M., Tehrani, M. A., & Karampour, S. (2015). Contextual Interference in Learning Three Table Tennis Services. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 546-549.

French, K. E., Rink, J. E., & Werner, P. H. (1990). Effects of contextual interference on retention of three volleyball skills. Perceptual and motor skills, 71(1), 179-186.

Gallahue, D., & Ozmun, J. (2002). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults with PowerWeb.

Giuffrida, C. G., Shea, J. B., & Fairbrother, J. T. (2002). Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules. Journal of motor behavior, 34(4), 353-365.

Goode, S., & Magill, R. A. (1986). Contextual interference effects in learning three badminton serves. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 57(4), 308-314.

Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of motor behavior, 36(2), 212-224.

Hall, K., & Boyle, M. (1993). The effects of contextual interference on shuffleboared skill in children. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 67(1), 52-58.

Jones, L. L., & French, K. E. (2007). Effects of contextual interference on acquisition and retention of three volleyballskills 1. Perceptual and motor skills, 105(3), 883-890.

Kalkhoran, A. F., & Shariati, A. (2012). The Effects of Contextual Interference on Learning Volleyball Motor Skills. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 12(4), 550.

Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 71(1), 10-24.

Landin, D., & Hebert, E. P. (1997). A comparison of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 68(4), 357-361.

Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 730.

Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human movement science, 9(3), 241-289.

Meira Jr, C. M., & Tani, G. (2001). The contextual interference effect in acquisition of dart-throwing skill tested on a transfer test with extended trials. Perceptual and motor skills, 92(3), 910-918.

Menayo, R., Moreno, F., Sabido, R., Fuentes, J., & Garcia, J. (2010). Simultaneous treatment effects in learning four tennis shots in contextual interferenceconditions1, 2. Perceptual and motor skills, 110(2), 661-673.

Ollis, S., Button, C., & Fairweather, M. (2005). The influence of professional expertise and task complexity upon the potency of the contextual interference effect. Acta Psychologica, 118(3), 229-244.

Porter, J. M. (2008). Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning novel motor skills.

Porter, J. M., & Saemi, E. (2010). Moderately skilled learners benefit by practicing with systematic increases in contextual interference. International Journal of Coaching Science, 4(2), 61-71.

Rouhollahi,V. Rozan,M. Mehrotra,A.(2014). Effect of Different Practice Schedules on Learning and Performance in Handball Task, American Journal of Sports Science. Vol. 2, No. 4, 2014, pp. 71-76.

Saemi, E., Porter, J. M., Ghotbi Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Shafinia, P. (2012). Practicing along the contextual interference continuum: A comparison of three practice schedules in an elementary physical education setting. Kineziologija, 44(2), 191-198.

Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. (1988). Motor control and learning.

Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179.

Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in memory and learning movement information. Advances in Psychology, 12, 345-366.

Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1988). Knowledge incorporation in motor representation. Advances in Psychology, 50, 289-314.

Shewokis, P. A. (2003). Memory consolidation and contextual interference effects with computer games. Perceptual and motor skills, 97(2), 581-589.

Smith, P. J. (2002). Applying contextual interference to snowboarding skills. Perceptual and motor skills, 95(3), 999-1005.

Smith, P. J., Gregory, S. K., & Davies, M. (2003). Alternating versus blocked practice in learning a cartwheel. Perceptual and motor skills, 96(3c), 1255-1264.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.