Academic Literacy Skills of Instructors Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language

Emrah Boylu, Arzu Çevi̇k

Abstract


Academic literacy covers reading, understanding, and evaluating academic studies that form the basis of science. It is one of the essential qualifications of the 21st century. In the education and training process, teachers are expected to have this skill in particular because teachers with academic qualifications integrate academic literacy skills with their professions according to the necessities of the time to improve themselves and present this to the learners during the teaching process. In this context, this study aims to determine Turkish instructors’ academic competence levels and examine them according to different variables. In the research using the survey model, «The Academic Literacy Scale» prepared by Demir and Deniz (2020) was used as a data collection tool. This scale, which consists of three factors: academic disposition, research process, and information use, consists of 28 items in total. The study determined that academic literacy skills were at a “high” level when the average score of the Turkish instructors from the overall scale was taken into account. When the academic literacy skills of Turkish instructors were examined in terms of various variables, no significant difference was found with the gender variable in the scale. Another divergence was found between the educational status variable and all the sub-dimensions of the scale, like research process, information use, and academic tendency. In addition, the graduated department variable differs with the research process and information use dimensions of the scale. There is also a significant difference between the variable of receiving education to increase academic literacy skills and the research process sub-dimension of the scale. Last but not least, a considerable distinction was discovered between all scale sub-dimensions and the overall scale in relation to the status of having knowledge of scientific research methodologies and having published academic work.

Keywords


Academic Literacy, Teaching Turkish As A Foreign Language, Instructors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aslan, C. (2010). Türkçe Eğitimi programlarında lisansüstü öğrenim gören öğrencilerin akademik özyeterliklerine ilişkin görüşleri. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 87-115.

Banks, G. C., Pollack, J. M., Bochantin, J. E., Kirkman, B. L., Whelpley, C. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016). Management’s science-practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2205–2231. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0728

Barends, E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2018). Evidence-based management: How to use evidence to make better organizational decisions. Kogan Page Ltd.

Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: What’s in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.1.zqr100

Boughey, C. (2000). Multiple metaphors in an understanding of academic literacy. Teachers and Teaching, 6(3), 279-290.

Burke, L. A., & Rau, B. (2010). The research-teaching gap in management. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(1), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.1.zqr132

Cengiz, C., & Karataş, F.Ö. (2014). Alan eğitiminde araştırma projesi dersi: Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının yansıtmaları. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 51-58.

Daemi, M., N., Tahriri, A., & Zafarghandi, A., M. (2017). The relationship between classroom environment and EFL learners’ academic self-efficacy. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies 5(4), 16-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.4p.16

Demir, S., & Deniz, H. (2020). Akademik okuryazarlık ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(3), 1366–1379.

Deniz, K., & Karagöl, E. (2017). Akademik yazma açısından tez yazım kılavuzları. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 5(2), 287-312.

Doru, M. N. (2018). Akademik okur-yazarlık. In M Öztürk (Ed.), Sosyal Bilimlerde Etik Sorunlar (pp. 87-102). Nobel Yayıncılık.

Ekmekçi, V. (2017). Yabancılara Türkçe Öğretiminde Akademik Okuryazarlık Öğretimine Yönelik Bir Eylem Araştırması [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Elkıran, M. Y. (2021). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının akademik okuryazarlık düzeyleri ile teknoloji yeterliği öz-değerlendirmeleri arasındaki ilişki. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(3), 325-343.

Harrington, I. A., Grisham, W., Brasier, D. J., Gallagher, S. P., Gizerian, S. S., Gordon, R. G., & Wiest, M. C. (2015). An instructor’s guide to (some of) the most amazing papers in neuroscience. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 14(1), 3- 14.

Hoskins, S. G., Stevens, L. M., & Nehm, R. H. (2007). Selective use of the primary literature transforms the classroom into a virtual laboratory. Genetics, 176(3), 1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.071183

Kan, M. O., & Gedik, F. N. (2016). Türkçe Eğitimi alanında yüksek lisans tezi tamamlayanların akademik yazma ve tez oluşturma sürecine ilişkin görüşleri. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(1), 402-408.

Karadağ, Ö ., & Maden, S. (2013). Yazma eğitimi: kuram, uygulama, ölçme ve değerlendirme. In A Güzel, & H Karatay (Eds.), Türkçe öğretimi el kitabı içinde (pp. 265-306). Pegem Akademi.

Karakoç, C., & Demir, Ö (2020). The predictive power of Turkish teachers’ reflective thinking skills perceptions in their problem solving skills perceptions. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies 8(3), 12-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.3p.12

Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Yayınları.

Karatay, H. (2009). Okuma stratejileri farkındalık ölçeği. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2(19), 58-80.

Kü çü koğlu, A., Taşgın, A. ve Çelik, N. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel araştırma sü recine ilişkin görü şleri üzerine bir inceleme (eğitim bilimleri bölü mü örneği). Tü rkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 173, 11-24.

Kurbanoğlu, S. S., Akkoyunlu, B., & Umay, A. (2006) Developing the information literacy self‐efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation, 62(6), 730-743, https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610714949.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K.C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33, 265-269.

Memiş, M. R. (2021). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretiminin güncel sorunları. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

Neeley, S. D. (2005). Academic Literacy. Pearson Longman.

Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4

Round, J. E., & Campbell, A. M. (2013). Figure Facts: Encouraging Undergraduates to Take a Data-Centered Approach to Reading Primary Literature. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(1), 39-46.

Taylor, V., & Stickney, L., DeMarr, B. & Fender, C, M. (2020). Improving Academic Literacy in the Management Classroom: Are Your Students Lost in Translation?. Management Teaching Review. 237929811990015. 10.1177/2379298119900156.

Tunagür, M. (2021). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının akademik okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 25(87), 435-450.

Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385

Weideman, A. (2003). Assessing and developing academic literacy. Per Linguam: a Journal of Language Learning=Per Linguam: Tydskrif vir Taalaanleer, 19(1-2), 55-65.

Weideman, A. (2018). Academic literacy: Five new tests. Geronimo Distribution. https://albertweideman.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/academic_literacy_aql_practice_test s_and_answers.pdf.

Yahşi Cevher, Ö., & Güngör, C. (2016). The importance of teaching academic Turkish as a foreign language. Anthropologist, 24(1), 309-318.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.4p.131

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.