Perceptions of Middle School Turkish Language Teachers on Using e-Learning Tools in Grammar Teaching

Onur ER, Hakan Saritiken

Abstract


By determining the perceptions of Turkish language teachers about using e-learning tools, it is possible to identify the obstacles to the use of e-learning tools in grammar teaching. The study aims to evaluate the Turkish language teachers’ perceptions about using e-learning tools in grammar teaching in the distance education process. The research was designed as a qualitative case study. The data collection process of the research was carried out in the 2021-2022 academic year. The study group consists of 22 Turkish language teachers working in public middle schools in Turkey who participated in the research voluntarily. Within the scope of the research, the opinions of Turkish language teachers were taken via semi-structured interview forms. According to the results, the majority of Turkish language teachers stated that e-learning tools should be used in grammar teaching. Teachers of Turkish stated that they benefited from EBA as an education portal in this context. Moreover, Turkish language teachers receive help from programs such as Zoom, Kahoot, Wordwall and Teams in grammar teaching during the distance education process. The majority of Turkish language teachers emphasised that they benefit from traditional measurement tools in the measurement and evaluation process of grammar teaching in distance education. Most of the Turkish language teachers participating in the research stated that they did not know Web 2.0 tools. Based on the findings of the research, it may be argued that Turkish language teachers should be introduced to technology and overcome their fears of using instructional technologies. This would enable the teachers to benefit more from e-learning tools in their lessons.

Keywords


Turkish Language Teachers, Turkish Curriculum, Grammar, Distance Learning, E-Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alyılmaz, S., & Alyılmaz, C. (2018). The importance of dialectology studies in regards to Turkish teaching. Turkish World Journal of Language and Literature, 45, 7-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.24155/tdk.2018.55

Arabacı, I. B., & Akilli, C. (2021). English teachers’ views on the use of web 2.0 tools in educational environments. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 7(2), 115-125.

Aytaçlı, B. (2012). A detailed analysis on case study. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Education Sciences, 3(1), 1-9.

Beniczky, S., Blümcke, I., Rampp, S., Shisler, P. Biesel, E., & Wiebe, S. (2020). e-learning comes of age: Web-based education provided by the International League Against Epilepsy. Epileptic Disorders, 22(3), 237-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/epd.2020.1157

Bojović, Ž., Bojović, P. D., Vujošević, D., & Šuh. J. (2020). Education in times of crisis: Rapid transition to distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cae.22318

Cantoni, V., Cellario, M., & Porta, M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 15(5), 333-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2003.10.002

Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE

De Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo A. S. T., & Pereira V. S. (2018). Distance education: advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, 29, 139–152. http://dx.doi.org/10. 5585/dialogia.N29.7661

Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 49-52. Accessed via https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Apr_15/Apr15.pdf.

Elmas, R., & Geban, O. (2012). Web 2.0 tools for 21st century teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 243-254. Accessed via https://iojes.net/?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=&makaleurl=IOJES_795.pdf&key=41244.

Faizi, R., Chiheb, R., & El Afia, A. (2015). Students’ perceptions towards using Web 2.0 technologies in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(6), 32–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i6.4858

Göçer, A., & Arslan, S. (2019). Evaluation of grammar teaching status performed in secondary school according to teachers’ opinions. Igdır University Journal of Social Sciences, 2(18), 297-326. Accessed via http://sosbilder.igdir.edu.tr/Makaleler/178648372_16_Gocer_(297-326).pdf.

Graham, K. (2015). TechMatters: Getting into Kahoot!(s): Exploring a game-based learning system to enhance student learning. LOEX Quarterly, 42(3), 6-7. Accessed via https://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1272&context=loexquarterly.

Gunawardhana, L. K. Pulasthi Dhananjaya (2020). Review of e-learning as a platform for distance learning in Sri Lanka. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(2), 141-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.03.02.126

İşcan, A. (2007). İşlevsel dil bilgisinin Türkçe öğretimindeki yeri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1, 253-258. Accessed via https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2819/37997.

Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. E., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.) Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 13-29). Taylor & Francis. Published with acknowledgment of federal support

Kekeç Morkoç, D., & Erdönmez, C. (2015). The effect of web 2.0 technology in the training processes: The sample of vocational school of Çanakkale social sciences. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 3, 335-346. Accessed via https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/higheredusci/issue/61508/918491.

Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020) The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: how teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820 480

Kırık, A. (2014). Historical development of distance education and the situation in Turkey./Marmara University Journal of Communication, 21, 73-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.17829/midr.20142110299

Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338

Kutlu Demir, Ö. (2018). 21st century learning: integration of web 2.0 tools in Turkish adult language classrooms. Unpublished PhD thesis, Çağ University, Mersin.

Lee, K. (2020). Who opens online distance education, to whom, and for what? Distance Education, 41(2), 186-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757 404

Mcmillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: evidence – based ınquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.

MEB. (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlilikleri. Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2th ed.). Sage Publication.

Odabaş, H. (2004). Use of internet based distance learning model towards information studies at higher education programs. In Kütüphaneciliğin Destanı Uluslararası Sempozyumu 21-24 Ekim 2004 (pp. 121-139). A.Ü. DTCF Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Bölümü Yayınları.

Özarslan, Y. (2008). Uzaktan eğitim uygulamaları için açık kaynak kodlu öğrenme yönetim sistemleri. In inet-tr’08 - XIII. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı 22-23 Aralık 2008 (pp. 55-60). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.

Riel, J., Christian, S., & Hinson, B. (2012). Charting digital literacy: A framework for information technology and digital skills education in the community college. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=278116

Sharp, L. A. (2018). Collaborative digital literacy practices among adult learners: Levels of confidence and perceptions of importance. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 153-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11111a

Sorohiti, M., & Aini, E. N. (2021). Grammar Teaching Materials: What Makes Them Interesting? Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 518, 270-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.135

Taranto, G., Dalbon, M., & Gaetano, J. (2011) Academic social networking brings Web 2.0 technologies to the middle grades. Middle School Journal, 42(5), 12-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461778

Tenekeci, M. (2020). Use of web and mobile applications in Turkish teaching and awareness of the teachers about it. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 49(227), 429-445. Accessed via https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/milliegitim/issue/56322/778318.

Thorvaldsen, S., & Madsen, S.S. (2020). Perspectives on the tensions in teaching with technology in Norwegian teacher education analysed using Argyris and Schön’s theory of action. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5281–5299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10221-4

Traxler, J. (2018). Distance learning-predictions and possibilities. Education Sciences, 8(35), 1- 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010035

Tsai, S., & Machado, P. (2002). E-learning, online learning, web-based learning, or distance learning: unveiling the ambiguity in current terminology. e-Learn Magazine, 7, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/566778.568597

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. Baskı). Seçkin.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.10n.4p.9

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.