The Doctoral Viva: Questions for, with and to Candidates (or supervisors)
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bitzer, E. (2014). Learning the language of the doctorate: doctorateness as a threshold concept in doctoral literacy. Per Linguam, 30(3), 39-52.
Burner, T., Bjerkholt, E., Gaathaug, A. G., Kleiven, S., & Ljoså, T. M. (2020). Doctorateness across higher education institutions in Norway, Uniped, 43 (1), 3-18.
Brien, D. L., Batty, C., Ellison, E., & Owens, A. (Eds.) (2019). The doctoral experience: Stories from the creative arts and humanities. Palgrave Macmillan.
Carter, S. (2008). Examining the doctoral thesis: a discussion. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 365-374.
Carter, S. (2012). English as an additional language (EAL) viva voce: The EAL doctorate oral examination experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(3), 271-284.
Cornér, S., Pyhälto, K., & Löfström, E. (2019). Supervisors’ perceptions of primary resources and challenges of the doctoral journey. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(3), 365-377.
Crossoard, B. (2011). The doctoral viva as a cultural practice: The gendered production of academic subjects.
Gender and Education, 23(3), 313-329.Dally, K., Holbrook, A., Graham, A., & Lawry, M. (2004). The processes and parameters of fine art PhD examination. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 1360162.
Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2004). Supervising the doctorate, a guide to success. Open University Press.
Denholm, C. & Evans, T. (Eds.) (2007). Supervising the doctorate downunder, keys to effective supervision. ACR Press.
Denicolo, P., Duke, D., & Reeves, J. (2020). Delivering inspiring doctoral assessment. Sage.
Dobson, S. (2018). Assessing the viva in higher education, chasing moments of truth. Springer.
Finn, J. A. (2005). Getting a PhD, an action plan to help manage your research, your supervisor and your project. Routledge.
Jackson, C., & Tinkler, P. (2001). Back to basics: A consideration of the purposes of the PhD viva. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 355-366.
Jonghin, G. (2010). A short guide to oral assessment. Leeds Metropolitan University & University of Wollongong.
Kelly, F. (2010). Reflecting on the purpose of the PhD oral examination, Research Note. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 45 (1), 77-83.
Kiley, M., Holbrook, A., Lovat, T., Fairbairn, H., Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2018). An oral component in PhD examination in Australia. Australian Universities’ Review, 60(1), 25-34.
Lantsoght, E. O. L. (2018) The A-Z of the PhD trajectory: a practical guide for a successful journey. Springer.
Lee, L., Blackmore, B., & Seal, E. (Eds.) (2013). Research journeys: a collection of narratives of the doctoral experience. Cambridge Scholars.
Leonard, D. (2001). A woman’s guide to doctoral studies. Open University Press.
Lovat, T., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., Kiley, M., Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. (2015). Examining doctoral examination and the question of the viva. Higher Education, (3), 5-23.
Mežek, Š., & Swales, J. (2016). PhD defences and vivas. In Hyland and P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 361-375). Routledge.
Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: how experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369-386.
Murray, R. (2015). How to survive your viva, defending a thesis in an oral examination (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language; a handbook for supervisors. Routledge.
Pearce, L. (2005). How to examine a thesis. Open University Press.
Phillips, E., & Pugh, D. S. (2015). How to get a PhD: a handbook for students (6th ed.). Open University Press.
Poole, B. (2014). The rather elusive concept of ‘doctorateness; a reaction to Wellington. Studies in Higher
tives from a sample of UK academics. London Review of Education, 13(3), 92-105.
Powell, S., & Green, H. (2007). The doctorate worldwide. Open University Press.
Salmon, P. (1992). Achieving a PhD – ten students’ experience. Trentham Books.
Smith, P. (2014). The PhD viva: how to prepare for your oral examination. Palgrave Macmillan.
Taylor, S; Kiley, M. & Humphrey, R. (2018) A handbook for doctoral supervisors (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2000). Examining the doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in Britain. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 167-180.
Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2004). The doctoral examination process: A handbook for students, examiners and supervisors. Open University Press.
Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2007). In the dark? Preparing for the PhD viva. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(2), 86-97.
Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2002a). Starting at the end to undertake doctoral research: Predictable questions as stepping stones. Higher Education Review, 34(1), 31-49.
Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2002b). Anatomy of a doctoral viva. Journal of Graduate Education, 3, 33-41
Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2008). Stepping stones to achieving your doctorate: focussing on the viva from the start. Open University Press.
Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 305-316.
Trafford, V., Leshem, S., & Bitzer, E. (2014). Conclusion chapters in doctoral theses: some international findings,
Higher Education Review, 46(3), 52-81.Watts, J. H. (2012). Preparing candidates for the viva: issues for students and supervisors. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(3), 371-381.
Wellington, J. (2013). Searching for ‘doctorateness’. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1490–1503.
Wellington, J. (2021) Examining doctoral work: exploring principles, criteria and processes. Routledge.
Wellington, J. J., Bathmaker, A. M., Hunt, C., McCulloch, G., & Sikes, P. (2005). Succeeding with your doctorate. Sage.
Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor. Palgrave Macmillan.
Yazdani, S., & Shokoosh, F. (2018). Defining doctorateness: A concept analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 31-48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.4p.2
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies
You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.