Gender, Scaffolding Mechanism and Output Complexity in Task-based Language Learning

Hamid Bahador, Amir Zand-Moghadam, Maryam Fanaie

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of gender in Iranian EFL learners’ output complexity and scaffolding mechanism as they were performing the tasks. The participants were 18 intermediate learners from both genders who were selected based on a proficiency test and an interview. They were placed into three groups based on their gender. They were also assigned into nine different collaborative pairs and were required to perform four tasks while being tape-recorded for 36 sessions. The audio-recorded dialogues were then transcribed and divided into AS-units. Ohta’s (2001) seven types of scaffolding methods were used as a framework to analyze the data. The findings indicated that the interlocutors in female-female pairs scaffolded their struggling partners more than the other pairs and produced a more complex output; however, the interlocutors in male-male pairs underperformed the other groups. It can be concluded that gender plays an important role in EFL learners’ output complexity and scaffolding mechanisms they employ. 

 


Keywords


AS-units, gender, scaffolding mechanism, sociocultural approach, task-based language learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aslan, O. (2009). The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Barnard, R. (2002). Peer tutoring in the primary classroom: A sociocultural interpretation of classroom interaction. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 57-72.

Basow, S. A., & Rubenfeld, K. (2003). Troubles talk: Effects of gender and gender-typing. Sex Roles, 48, 183-187.

Bassiri, M. A. (2012). The impact of scaffolding as a strategy for teaching reading on the motivation of Iranian L2 learners. British Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 32-46.

Blanton, M., Berenson, S., & Norwood, K. (2001). Using classroom discourse to understand a prospective mathematics teacher's developing practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 227-242.

Brantmeier, C., Schueller, J., Wilde, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2007). Gender equity in foreign and second language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1-40.

Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.

Crookes , G., & Gass, S. M. (1993). Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.

Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. The Journal of the Learning Science, 13(3), 265-272.

De Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 421-446.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402-430.

Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student's contribution to second language learning (Part 1): Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25(4), 211-220.

Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (2004). Second language conversations. London: Continuum.

Grandman, H., & Hanania, E. (1991). Language learning background factors and ESL proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 39-51.

Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61(8), 760-771.

Khodamoradi, A., Irvani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2013). The effects of teacher's scaffolding and peers’ collaborative dialogue on the acquisition of English tenses in the zone of proximal development: A sociocultural perspective. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 336-346.

Ko, J., Schallert, D., & Walters, K. (2003). Rethinking scaffolding: Examining negotiation of meaning in an ESL storytelling task. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 303-324.

Lantolf, J. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Leaper, C. (1991). Influence and involvement in children's discourse: Age, gender, and partner effects. Child Development, 62, 797-811.

Lee, C. D. (1993). Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation: The pedagogical implications of an African-American discourse genre. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Lee, Y. S., & Choi, J. W. (2006). A study on the difference in frequency and strategy of scaffolding by scaffolder. The Journal of Korea Early Childhood Education, 13(4), 397-427.

Many, J. E., Dewberry, D., Taylor, D. L., & Coady, K. (2009). Profiles of three preservice ESOL teachers’ development of instructional scaffolding. Reading Psychology, 30(2), 148-174.

Mason, E. S. (1994). Gender differences in job satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology,135, 143-151.

McCosker, N., & Diezmann, C. (2009). Scaffolding students’ thinking in mathematical investigations. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 14(3), 27-33.

McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(3), 207-224.

McKenzie, J. (1999). Scaffolding for success. The Educational Technology Journal, 9(4). Retrieved from: http://fno.org/dec99/scaffold.html

Mehdian, N. (2009). Teacher’s role in the reading apprenticeship framework: Aid by the side or sage by the stage. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 3-12.

Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83-108.

Merchant, K. (2012). How men and women differ: Gender differences in communication style, influence tactics, and leadership style. Unpublished senior thesis, Claremont McKenna College, retrieved from: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/513

Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Edward Arnold.

Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.

Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender as culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research, 27, 121-152.

Nguyen, M. H. (2013). EFL students’ reflections on peer scaffolding in making a collaborative oral presentation. English Language Teaching, 6(4), 64-73.

Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. London: Longman.

O’Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Language learning strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1992). Instructional implications of gender differences in second/foreign language learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning, 4(1 & 2), 65-94.

Oxford, R., & Ehrman, M. (1993). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 188-205.

Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, A., Piller, I., & Teutsch-Dwyer, M. (2001). Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Pishghadam, R., & Ghadiri, S. (2011). Symmetrical or asymmetrical scaffolding: Piagetian vs. Vygotskyan views to reading comprehension. Journal of Language and Literacy Education , 7(1), 49-64.

Ranter, C. (2002). Cultural psychology: Theory and method. New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.

Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2010). Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. In A. Feryok (Ed.), CLESOL 2010: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Languages and ESOL (pp. 55-63).

Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Skehan, P. (1986). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 81-94). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.

Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 275-298.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stone, A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 344-364.

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.

Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143-159.

Sunderland, J. (2000a). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33(4), 203-223.

Sunderland, J. (2000b). New understanding of gender and language classroom research: Texts, teacher talk and student talk. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 149-173.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.

Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439-473.

Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Villamil, O., & Guerrero, M. D. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.

Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2008). Perception of learner proficiency: Its impact on the interaction between an ESL learner and her higher and lower proficiency partners. Language Awareness, 17(2), 115-130.

Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd Ed.) (pp. 841-873). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wollman-Bonilla, J. E., & Werchadlo, B. (1999). Teacher and peer roles in scaffolding first-graders’ responses to literature. The Reading Teacher, 52(6), 598-607.

Wood, J. T. (1996). Gendered lives: Communication, gender and culture (2nd ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(1), 89-100.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.146

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.