Email this article 
Hide
Show all
The Production of Yes/No Questions, Wh-Questions, and Embedded Clauses as Functional Categories at the Initial Stage of Child L2 Acquisition
Abstract
This is a longitudinal case study of two Farsi-speaking children learning English: ‘Bernard’ and ‘Melissa’, who were 7;4 and 8;4 at the start of data collection. The research deals with the presence or absence of functional categories (CP),in our case Yes/no questions, Wh-questions, and embedded clauses as well as their production rate in early stages of interlanguage development of the child second language (L2) acquisition of syntax. Some studies in the field of child second language acquisition regarding the production of functional categories (CP) are discussed. Examining data collected from the children’s spontaneous speech, the researcher’s diaries and translation and other tasks over a period of 20 months, the competing claims of the two most prominent hypotheses about early L2 grammars are tested: Vainikka& Young-Scholten’s (1996) Minimal Trees/Structure Building hypothesis and Schwartz & Sprouse’s (1996). Full Transfer/Full Access hypothesis. The conclusion is reached that Yes/no questions, Wh-questions, and embedded clauses as three functional categories are absent in early stages of interlanguage development of the child L2acquisition.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bhatt, R.M., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. (2002).Structural Minimality, CP and the initial state in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 18(4), 348-392.
Brown, R. (1968). The development of Wh-questions in child speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 7, 279-290.
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E.J. & Schumann, J.H. (1978).The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish Speakers. In E.M. Hatch (ed.).
Eubank, L. (1996). Negation in early German-English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research, 12, 73 106.
Gerbault, J. (1978). The acquisition of English by a five year old French speakers. Master’s thesis, University of California at Los Angles.
Grondin, N. & White, L. (1996). Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition, 5,1-34.
Guilfoyle, E. & Noonan, M. (1992).Functional Categories and Language Acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 241-272.
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax. A Generative Introduction. Oxford, Blackwell.
Haznedar, B & Schwartz, B.D. (1997).Are there Optional Infinitive in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes
& A. Greenhill (eds.). Proceeding of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA. Cascadilla Press PP. 257-268.
Haznedar, B. (1997). Child second language acquisition of English. A Longitudinal Case Study of a Turkish-Speaking Child, PhD dissertation, University o Durham, UK.
Haznedar, B. (2001). The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 English. Studies in second language acquisition, 23,1-39.
Klima, E. &Bellugi, U. (1966).Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In J. Lyons & R.J. Wales. (eds.) Psycholinguistic Papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 183-208.
Lakshmanan, U. &Selinker, L. (1994).The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars of English. Second Language Research 10, 25-48.
Lakshmanan, U. (1993/94). The boy for the cookie’-Some evidence for the non violation of the Case Filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 3(1), 55-91.
Lakshmanan, U. (1994). Universal Grammar in Child Second Language Acquisition: Null subjects and morphological uniformity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lebeaux, D. (1989). Parameter-setting, the acquisition sequence, and the form of the grammar: The composition of phrase structure. Paper presented at GLOW. Utrecht.
Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge.
Platzack, C. (1990). A grammar without functional categories: A syntactic study of early Swedish child language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 13, 107-126.
Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Radford, A. (1992). The acquisition of morphosyntax of finite verbs in English. In Meisel, J., (ed). The acquisition of
verb placement. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1-22.
Radford, A. (1995). Children: Architects or Brickies? In D. MacLaughlin& S. McEwen (eds.). Proceedings of BUCLD 19, 1-19.
Schwartz, B.D. &Sprouse, R.A. (1996).L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model.Second Language Research, 12(1), 40-72.
Tsimpli, I.M. (1992). Functional Categories and Maturation: The Prefunctional Stages of Language Acquisition. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 3,128-198.
Unsworth, S. (2005). Child L2, Adult L2, Child L1: Differences and Similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch.PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. (1994). Direct access to X-bar theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (eds.) Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 265-316.
Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. (1996a). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12(1),7-39.
Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. (1996b). The early stages in adult L2 syntax: Additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research, 12(2),140-176.
Vainikka, A. & Young-Scholten, M. (2005).The roots of syntax and how they grow.Organic Grammar, the Basic Variety and Processability Theory. In S. Unsworth, A. Sorace, T. Parodi and M. Young-Scholten (eds). Paths of Development in L1 and L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.39
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.