The Effect of Three Kinds of Reading Strategies on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Gender Difference Using Think-aloud Protocol

Ali Fathi Karizak, Laleh Khojasteh

Abstract


Reading comprehension strategy instruction is a powerful tool in teaching context. The present study examines the effect of teaching three kinds of reading strategies on L2 learners’ reading comprehension ability as well as identifying the gender role in this intervention. This quasi experimental study was carried out on 100 Iranian EFL students who were chosen on the basis of a convenient sampling procedure. These participants were divided into two groups of experimental and control.  50 students (experimental group) were taught to use three reading comprehension strategies while reading English texts over 16 sessions, whereas the other 50 students (control group) were taught reading comprehension traditionally. The results of the study revealed significant effect of reading strategies application on L2 learners’ reading comprehension ability. It also showed that not only male learners employ reading strategies more than their female counterparts, but also male learners had higher reading comprehension performance in comparison to their female counterparts. Thus, it seems that training of reading strategy raised students' awareness towards these strategies and could encourage some learners to use them; which in turn could improve the students' reading comprehension skill.  

 


Keywords


Reading; Strategy; Reading strategies; Reading comprehension; Think-aloud protocol

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alderson, J.C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a Language Problem? In J. C. Alderson and A. H. Urquahart (Eds.). 1984: Reading in a foreign Language. London: Longman.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Razavieh, A. (2005). Introduction to research in education, 7th edition. Wadsworth / Thomson Learning, California.

Baier, J. R. (2005). Reading comprehension and reading strategies. Published dissertation. Master of Education Degree in Education. The Graduate School: University of Wisconsin-Stout.

Bernhardt, E.B. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second-language reading. In Mary McGroarty (Ed). Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. (pp. 133-150). Cambridge: CUP.

Brantmeier, C. (2001). Second language reading research on passage content and gender. Challenges for the intermediate level curriculum. Foreign language Annals, 34, 325-333.

Caposey, T., & Heider, B. (2003). Improving reading comprehension through cooperative learning. Unpublished dissertation. St. Xavier University & Pearson/Skylight, Chicago, IL.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, Thomson learning, Inc.

Cooper, J. D. (1999). Literacy: Helping children construct meaning. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Cullum, L. (1998). Encouraging the reluctant reader: Using a Think-aloud Protocol to Discover Strategies for Reading Success. ERIC Document No. ED420 837.

Davis, S. (2010). A meta–analysis of comprehension strategy instruction for upper elementary and middle school students. Unpublished PHD, dissertation. Vanderbilt University, America.

Day, R. R. & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. In Cambridge language education (J.C. Richards, Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Duke, N. (2003, March 7). Comprehension instruction for informational text. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Michigan Reading Association, Grand Rapids, MI.

Ericsson, K., & Simon, H.J. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ghonsooly, B. (1997). Introspection as a method of identifying and describing competence in reading skills, Doctoral dissertation, University of Stirling, UK.

Goh, C., & Foong, K. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, Proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 39-53.

Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. Harlow: Longman.

Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-69.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (1985). Two approaches to teaching reading: A classroom-based study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 3, 363- 373.

Hannu, K. & Pallab, P. (2002). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 11-18, 387-404.

Harvey S. & Goudris, A. (2000). Strategies that Work: Teaching Comprehension to enhance. Understanding: Portland, M.E. Stenhouse.

Hong-Nam. K, Leavell. AG. (2007). A Comparative study of language learning strategy use in an EFL context: Monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean-Chinese University students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 71-88.

Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, k. E. (1992). The relationship between teacher’s beliefs and practices during literacy instruction for non-native speakers of English. Journal of reading behavior,24(1), 83-108.

Kafipour, R. & Naveh, M. H. (2011). Vocabulary learning strategies and their contribution to reading comprehension of EFL undergraduate students in Kerman province. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 626-647.

Kafipour, R., Noordin, N. & Pezeshkian, F. (2010). Effects of motivation and gender on the choice of language learning strategies by Iranian postgraduate students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19(1), 159-171.

Kamhi , A.G. (2005). Finding beauty in the ugly facts about reading comprehension. In H. W. Catts, & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connection between language and reading disabilities (pp.201-212). New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kern, R. (1989). Second language reading strategies instruction: its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. Modern language Journal, 73, 135-49.

Keshavarz. M.H & Ashtarian, S. (2008). The Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Gender and Reading Comprehension of Three Different Types of Text. Iranian journal of applied linguistics, 11(1), 97-114.

Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.

Khosravi, A. (2000). The effect of scanning and skimming on the rate of and reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Master thesis Shiraz University, Iran.

Koda, K. (2004). Insight in to second language. Across-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Lee, L & Gundersen, E. (2001). Select Readings: Intermediate. Oxford university press.

Mackey, A. & Gass, S, M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McKeown, M. Beck, I. and Blake, R. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches, Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218-253.

Marzban, A. & Adibi, A. (2014). The effect of teaching paragraph structure rules on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 387-394.

Mehrpour, S., Razmjoo, S. A., & Kian, P. (2011). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English language teaching and learning, 53(222), 97-127.

Mikulecky, B. and Jeffries, L. (2004). More Reading Power. New York: Pearson.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Oxford, R. L. (1993) Instructional implication of gender differences in second /foreign language (L2) learning styles and strategies. Applied language learning, 4(182), 65-94.

Oxford, R. L., & Burry- Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy Inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23, 1-23.

Paris, S. Wasik, B. & Turner, J. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil& P. Mosenthal. (eds.). Handbook of reading research (1), (pp.609-640). New York: Longman.

Paris, S. G. Lipson, M.Y. & Wixon, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.

Poole, A. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female Colombian university students. Issues in teachers’ professional Development, 11(1), 29-40.

Poole, A. (2005). Gender and academic reading strategies: A survey of adult EFL learners in Mainland China. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 38-51.

Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53, 649-702.

Pressely, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Salataci, R. & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction onL1 and L2 reading. Reading in a foreign language, 14 (1). 234-255.

Shamis, W. A. (2003) Language learning strategy use in Palestine. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 20-33.

Shang, Hai-Fang(2010). Reading Strategy Use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 18-42.

Sheorey, R. & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers.

Soleimani, H. & Hajghani, S. (2013). The effect of teaching reading comprehension strategy on Iranian EFL, pre-university students’ reading comprehension ability. International journal of Payame Noor University of Iran.

Sotoudehnama, E., & Asadian, M, (2011). The effect of gender oriented content familiarity and test type on reading comprehension. The journal of teaching language skills, 3(2), 155-179.

Szoke, E. & Sheorey, R. (2002). A comparative study of the learning strategies of Hungarian and Russian college Students. Novelty, 9(3), 23-36.

Wells, G. (1990). Talk about text: where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(4), 369-405.

Wright, M. & Brown, P. (2006). Reading in a modern foreign language: exploring the potential benefits of reading strategy instruction. Language learning journal, 33, 22-23.

YaaliJahromi. A. (2002). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners' sex, and level of proficiency, and their reading comprehension strategy use. MA. Thesis, Shiraz Azad University.

Yang, Y. (2002).Reassessing Reader’s Comprehension Monitoring. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 18-42.

Yau. JC. (2005). Two Mandarin readers in Taiwan: Characteristics of children with higher and lower reading proficiency levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 108-123.

Yazdanpanah, Kh. (2007). The effect of background knowledge and reading comprehension test items on male and female performance. The Reading Matrix, 7(2), 64-80.

Zolfagharkhani, M. & Kowsary, M. A. (2013). The Relationship between Reading Aloud Strategies and Comprehension Among the Iranian EFL learners in Pre-Intermediate Levels, Studies in Literature and Language, 6(1), 74-77.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.