Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Development of Relative Clause Constructions in English L2
Abstract
This study explores how relative clause (RC) constructions develop in the acquisition of English as a second language (L2). The acquisition of RC constructions has been the focus of much research in the field of language acquisition, but a majority of L2 studies in this area is experimental based on the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy (NPAH) (Keenan & Comrie, 1977). In this study, the spontaneous speech production by a Japanese primary school child, learning English in a naturalistic environment, was audio-recorded regularly over two years, and the development of RC constructions was compared with the acquisition of other English morphological and syntactic structures as represented within Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann, 1998; Pienemann, Di Biase, & Kawaguchi, 2005; Pienemann & Keßler, 2011). Although PT predicts that subordinate clauses are acquired at the highest stage in processability hierarchy, the results in this longitudinal study show that some types of RC constructions emerge at earlier stages in L2 English acquisition. The results also show that RC constructions in the Japanese child’s English L2 develop in the similar way to those reported in L1 studies (e.g., Diessel, 2004).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baten, K. & Håkansson, G. (2015). The development of subordinate clauses in German and Swedish as L2s: A theoretical and methodological comparison. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-31. doi:10.1017/S0272263114000552
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B. (Eds.) (2015). Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory. European Second Language Association.
Bloom, L. (1991). Language development from two to three. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bowerman, M. (1979). The acquisition of complex sentences. In P. Fletcher & Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 285-305). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bresnan, J., & Mchombo, S. (1987). Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language, 63(4), 741-782.
Dalrymple, M. (2001). Syntax and semantics: Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research 18 (3), 272-300.
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., Yamaguchi, Y. (2015). The development of English as a second language. In C. Bettoni, & B. Di Biase (Eds.) Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory. European Second Language Association.
Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics, 11 (1-2), 131-151.
Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2001). The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: a corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 97-141.
Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Languages, 81 (4), 882-906.
Doughty, C.J. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315-330.
Eckman, F. R. (1984). Universals, typologies and interlanguage. In W. E. Ruthherford (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 79-105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eckman, F.R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clauses instruction on the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1-20.
Eckman, F. R. (1996). A functional-typological approach to second language acquisition theory. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33-68). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Fitz, H., Chang, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2011). A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology and function (pp. 39-60). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327-344.
Hawkins, J. A. (1987). Implicational universals as predictions of language acquisition. Linguistics, 25, 453-473.
Itani-Adams, Y. (2007). One child, two languages: Bilingual first language acquisition in Japanese and English. PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney, Sydney.
Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53, 285-323.
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
Kidd, E. & Bavin, E. L. (2002). English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses: Evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 599-617.
Kroeger, .P.R. (2005). Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kuno, S. (1974). The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 117-136.
Lambrecht, K. (1988). There was a farmer had a dog: syntactic amalgams revisited. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14, 319-339.
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 169-185). New York: Academic Press.
MacWhinney, B., & Pleh, C. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29, 95-141.
Mellow, D. (2006). The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics, 27, 620-644.
Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal models, and relative clause formation in a formal and informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 38-55.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M. (Ed.) (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199-251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Pienemann, M. & Keßler J-U. (2011). Studying Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sakai, H. (2008). An analysis of Japanese university students’ oral performance in English using processability theory. System, 36(4), 534-549.
Schumann, J.H. (1980). The acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In R. Scarcella, C. & Krashen, S. (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Selected papers of the Lost Angeles Second Language Acquisition Research Forum (pp. 118-131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House
Sheldon, A. (1974). On the role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272-281.
Yamaguchi, Y. (2013a). Child second language learning: A study of English as a second language acquisition. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Yamaguchi, Y. (2013b). The acquisition of complex structures: The case of child ESL. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3(3), 2013.
Yamaguchi, Y. & Kawaguchi, S. (2013). Developing relative clause constructions in English as a second language. Paper presented in the 13th International Symposium of Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition (PALA 2013), Lund University, Sweden, 20-21 September, 2013.
Yamaguchi, Y. & Kawaguchi, S. (2014). Acquisition of English morphology by a Japanese school-aged child: A longitudinal study, The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 16(1), 89-119.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.1p.83
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.