Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Establishing the Thematic Structure and Investigating the most Prominent Theta Roles Used in Sindhi Language
Abstract
This study focuses on the thematic structure of the Sindhi verbs to find theta roles in the Sindhi language. The study tries to answer the research questions; “What are the thematic structures of Sindhi verbs?” and “What are the prominent theta roles in the Sindhi language?” It examines the argument/thematic structure of Sindhi verbs and also finds the theta roles assigned by the Sindhi verbs to their arguments along with the most prominent theta roles used in the Sindhi language. The data come from the two interviews taken from two young native Sindhi speakers, which consist of 2 hours conversation having 1,669 sentences in natural spoken version of the Sindhi language. Towards the end, it has been found that the Sindhi language has certain theta roles which are assigned by the verbs to their arguments in sentences. Each verb phrase in our data is thus examined and studied in detail in terms of Argument/Thematic structure in order to find theta roles in Sindhi language. Thus, in this regard, each verb phrase (in a sentence) has been examined with the help of Carnie’s theoretical framework (Thematic Relation and Theta Roles: 2006) in order to find the prominent theta roles in the Sindhi language. The data have been examined and analysed on the basis of the Carnie’s theoretical framework. The study finds that the Sindhi language has all (09) theta roles which have been proposed by Carnie (2006). It has been found that six prominent theta roles out of nine are used prominently in Sindhi. The six prominent theta roles in Sindhi language are: agent, theme, beneficiary, recipient, locative and goal.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adwani, B. (1985). .وڏو سنڌي وياڪرڻ: Jamshoro.: Institute of Sindhalogy, Jamshoro, Sindh.
Allana, G. A. (2010). . سنڌيڪا سنڌي گرامر. Karachi.: Sindhica Academy, Karachi, Pakistan.
Arshad, A. (1986). فيق گرامر Hala.: International Academy, Hala, Sindh, Pakistan.al.,.
Baker, M. C. (1996). Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure. Liliane Haegeman (ed). Iin Elements of Grammar, 73-137.
Be, M. Q. (2006). سنڌي وياڪرڻ Hyderabad: Qaleech, M. (2006). سنڌي وياڪرڻ (J. Sindhi Adabi Board Ed.). Hyderabad.: Sindhi Adabi Board, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.
Bierwisch, M. (2006). Thematic Roles- Universal, Particular, and Ideosyncratic Aspects. Ina Bornknessel, Matthias Schlesewsky, Bernard Comrie, Angela D. Friederici (Eds. Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 89-126.
Carnie, A. (2006). A general Introduction (Second ed.). USA.: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Chano, M. I. (2011). آسان سنڌي گرامر Mehrabpur, Sindh, Pakistan.: M. Sindhi Sahat Ghar, Sindh, Pakistan. Ed.
Devis, A. R. (2009). Thematic Roles. online 1 (202) 449-1315.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language, 67(3), 547-619.
Ezeizabarrena, M. J. (2012). The (in)consistent ergative marking in early Basque: L 1 vs child L 2. Lingua(122), 303-317.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure: Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Hackl, M. (2013). The Synax-semantics interface. Lingua(130), 66-87.
Harley, H. (2013). External Arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua(125), 34-57.
Holmberg, A. R., I. (2013). The syntax-morphology relation. Lingua(130), 111-131.
Jokhio, A. H. (2011). وياڪرڻ جي اهم جُزفعل جو مختصر اڀياس. . Sindhi Boli Tahqeeqi Journal, Sindhi Language Authority, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan. , 2, 78-100., 78-100.
Jokhio, A. H. (2012). جزم جي دُرست استعمال جو مسعلو. Sindhi Boli Tahqeeqi Journal, Sindhi Language Authority, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan, 68-90.
Jokhio, A. H. (2013a). .فعل لازمي ۽ فعل متعدي جو مختصر اڀياس. Sindhi Boli Tahqeeqi Journal, Sindhi Language Authority, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan., 41ڏ75.
Jokhio, A. H. (2013b). وضاحت در وضاحت. Sindhi Boli Tahqeeqi Journal, Sindhi Language Authority, Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan., 160-162.
Lehman, C. (2005). Participant roles, thematic roles and syntactic relations. Paper presented at the SKY Conference on 'Syntactic Functions-Focus on the Periphery', Helsinki, 14-15. 11. 2003.
Luuk, E. (2009). The Noun/Verb and Predicate/Argument Structure. Lingua, 119, 1707-1727.
Marantz, A. (2013). Verbal argument structure: Evidents and participants. Lingua(130), 152-168.
Radford, A. (2009). Introduction to English Sentence Structure.: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rappaport, M. H. L., B. (2004). Deconstructing Thematic Hierarchies. Architectures, Rules, and Prferences: Afrestschrift for Joan Bresnan (pp. 451-468): Stanford, CA: CSIL Publications.
Rashidi, M. (2007). سوجھرو Kandyaro: Roshini Publication Kandyaro, Sindh, Pakistan.
Sindhi, D. (2010). سنڌيڪا سنڌي گرامر. Karachi: Sindhica Academy, Karachi, Sindh, Pakisan.
Swart, P. d. e. a. (2008). Animacy. argument structure, and argument encoding. Lingua(118), 131-140.
Verhoeven, E. (2014). Thematic Prominence and animacy asymmeteries. Evidence from a cross-linguistic production study. Lingua, 143, 129-161.
Wechsler, S. (2005). Thematic Structure The Encyclopedic of language and Linguistics (Second ed.): Elsevier.
Williams, E. (1987). NP Trace in Theat Theory. Linguistics and Philosophy. Topics in Syntax and Semantics: NP, Non-A Binding, 10(4), 433-447.
Willits, J. A. e. a. (2007). Distributional Statistics and Thematic Role Relationship. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.216
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.