A Gender-based Study of Iranian EFL Learners' Pragmatic Awareness: The Role of Receptive Skill-based Teaching
Abstract
This study explored the effects of contextual factors, namely exposure to instruction and gender difference on Iranian EFL learners' pragmatic perception of the illocutionary act of apology. To this end, sixty four upper-intermediate English learners (34 males & 30 females ranging in age from 17 to 27), from a language institute in a city in north-eastern Iran, voluntarily took part in the study. While investigation of the effect of explicit instruction of apology speech act, through consciousness-raising listening prompts, on EFL learners' interlanguage pragmatic competence is one of the current study's prime concerns, the participants, who were equally assigned to an experimental group and a control group, were given 14 sessions of instruction accompanied, merely within the experimental class, by consciousness-raising activities via listening prompts. Adopting a multiple choice discourse completion task (MDCT) as both the pre-test and post-test, the results confirmed the beneficial effect of listening-based teaching of apology speech act juxtaposed with consciousness-raising activities on the learners' pragmatic awareness. Besides, the context-external factor of gender yielded a significant impact on the way females and males, in the experimental group, perceived the communicative act of apology. In the light of the findings, the study provides implications for curriculum designers, materials developers, and language teachers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Achiba, M. (2003). Learning to request in a second language: A study of child interlanguage pragmatics. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Second Language Acquisition Series.
Afghari, A., &Karimnia, A. (2007).A contrastive study of four cultural differences in everyday conversation between English and Persian. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16(1), 243.
Afghari, A., &Karimnia, A. (2012).On apologizing in Persian: A socio-cultural inquiry. Jezikoslovlje, 13(3), 697-734.
Alcón, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33(1), 417-435.
Alcón, E., &Pitarch, J. G. (2010). The effect of instruction on learners’ pragmatic awareness: A focus on refusals. International Journal of English Studies.10(1), 65-80.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1996).Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence. Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1993).Learning the rules of academic talk. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(03), 279-304.
Barekat, B., & Mehri, M. (2013).Investigating the effect of metalinguistic feedback in L2 pragmatic instruction. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(2), 197-208.
Bergman, M. L., & Kasper, G. (1993).Perception and performance in native and nonnative apology. Interlanguage Pragmatics, 4(1),82-107.
Birjandi, P., &Derakhshan, A. (2014).The impact of consciousness-raising video-driven vignettes on the pragmatic development of apology, request, & refusal. Applied Research on English Language, 3(1), 67-85.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989).Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Blum-Kulka, S., &Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-culture study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196-213.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical aspects of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001).Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Heinle &Heinle Publishers.
Cohen, A. D. (1996). Developing the ability to perform speech acts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 253-267.
DeVellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications.
Doughty, C. J. (2003).Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation and enhancement. InC. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (Eds.),Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ellis, R. ( 2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eslami-Rasekh, A. &Mardani, M. (2010).Investigating the effects of teaching apology speech act, with a focus on intensifying strategies on pragmatic development of EFL learners: The Iranian context. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture,30(1), 96-103.
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2004). Face keeping strategies in reaction to complaints: English and Persian. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication,14(1), 181–198.
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners.ELT Journal, 59(3), 199-208.
Eslami-Rasekh, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., &Fatahi, A. (2004). The effect of explicit metapragmatic instruction on the speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL-EJ, 8(2), 1-12.
Farashaiyan, A., & Tan, K. H. (2012).On the relationship between pragmatic knowledge and language proficiency among Iranian male and female undergraduate EFL learners.3L; Language, Linguistics and Literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies,18(1), 33-46.
Fowler, W. S.,& Coe, N. (1976).Nelson English language tests. Victoria: Thomas Nelson Ltd.
Garcia, C. (1989). Apologizing in English: Politeness strategies used by native and non-native speakers. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8(1), 3-20.
Gass, S. M., &Selinker, L. (2008).Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Taylor & Francis.
Gholamia, J., & Aghaeib, H. K. (2012). The impact of explicit and implicit instruction on Iranian EFL learners' production and recognition of language functions. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences,9 (2), 107-131.
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academy Press.
Holmes, J. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 194-213.
House, J. (1988). Oh excuse me please...”: Apologizing in a foreign language. EnglischalsZweitsprache, 30(3),13-27.
Hymes, D. H. (1972).On communicative competence.In B. Pride&Y. J. Holmes (Eds.),Sociolinguistics (pp. 46-59). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Judd, E. L. (1999). Some issues in the teaching of pragmatic competence. Culture in second language teaching and learning, 5(3), 152-166.
Kargar, A., Sedighi, F., &Ahmadi, A. R. (2012).The effects of collaborative translation task on the apology speech act production of Iranian EFL learners. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS),4(3), 47-78.
Kasper, G. (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research, 8 (3), 203-231.
Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? Network, 6(2), 105-119.
Kasper, G. (1998). Interlanguage pragmatics. In H. Byrnes (Ed.).Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 183-208).New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.) (1993).Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002).Pragmatic development in a second language. Mahwah, NJ: Blackwell publishing.
Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 149-169.
Lakoff, R. T. (2001). Nine ways of looking at apologies: The Necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in discourse analysis. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 18(2), 187-199.
Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N. (1999).How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Littlewood, W. (1981).Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez-Flor, A., & AlcónSoler, E. (2007). Developing pragmatic awareness of suggestions in the EFL classroom: A focus on instructional effects. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics,10(1), 46- 76.
Meier, A. (1996). Two cultures mirrored in repair work. Multilingua, 15,149–169.
Meier, A. (1997). Teaching the universals of politeness.ELT Journal, 51(1), 21-28.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching &learning. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Olshtain, E. & Cohen, A. (1983). Apology: A speech act set. In Wolfson, N. and Judd, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp.18-35). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Olshtain, E. & Cohen, A. (1989): Speech act behavior across languages. In H.W. Dechert& M. Raupach, (Eds.),Transfer in language production (pp. 53-67). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Omaggio Hadley, A. (1993). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle&Heinle.
Qorina, D. (2012). "Realization of apology strategies by English department students of Pekalongan university. Language Circle,7(1), 36-49.
Richards, J. C. (2003). Developing tactics for listening: Student book. Oxford University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2005). Interchange I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rintell, E. (1979). Getting your speech act together: The pragmatic ability of second language learners. Working Papers on Bilingualism Toronto, 17, 97-106.
Rose, K. R. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2.Journal of Pragmatics, 41(2), 2345–2364.
Safa, M. A.,& Mahmoodi, M. H. (2012). The interface between linguistic and pragmatic competence: The case of disagreement, scolding, requests, and complaints. Journal of English Language,10 (3), 1-26.
Salazar, C. P. (2008). Examining mitigation in requests: A focus on transcripts in ELT course books. In Alcon Soler, E. & SafontJordia, M. P. (Eds.),Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 207- 222).Springer.
Saslow, J., &Ascher, A. (2006).Top Notch Series. Pearson Education: New York.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, leaning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp.21-42).Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soars, J., Soars, L., Falla, T., & Cassette, W. (2002). American Headway: Starter: Student Book. Oxford University Press.
Stenstrom, A. B. (1994). An introduction to spoken interaction. London: Longman.
Taguchi, N. (Ed.) (2009). Pragmatic competence. New York, Berlin: MoutondeGruyter.
Taguchi, N. (2010). Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics, 16(4), 56-69.
Takahashi, S. (2001).The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence.In K.R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp.171-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Takimoto, M. (2006).The effects of explicit feedback and form–meaning processing on the development of pragmatic proficiency in consciousness-raising tasks. System, 34(4), 601-614.
Takimoto, M. (2012).Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 3, 1-14.
Tanck, S. (2002).Speech Act sets of refusal and complaint: A comparison of native and non-native English speakers production. Unpublished PhD dissertation.American University, Washington, DC.
Tehrani, M. D., Rezaei, O., Dezhara, S., &Kafrani, R. S.(2012).Apology strategies of Iranian undergraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 93-109.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
Tuncel, R, (2011). Apologizing and speech act realizations of Turkish EFL learners. International Conference on Management, Economics and Social Sciences (ICMESS'2011) Bangkok Dec., 2011
Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics, 9(2), 145-178.
Wong, S. M. L. (1994). Imperatives in requests: Direct or impolite-observations from Chinese. Pragmatics, 4(2), 491–515.
Yoshimi, D. R. (2001). Explicit instruction and JFL learner’s use of interactional discourse markers. In K.R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 223-244).Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Zimin, S. (1981). Sex and politeness: Factors in first- and second-language use. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 35-58.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.6p.53
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.