EFL Learners’ Negotiation of Meaning

Samira Saeed Rashid Al Hosni

Abstract


This study aimed at investigating EFL learners’ frequency of negotiation of meaning when performing focused and unfocused communication tasks. The sample consists of thirty learners divided into ten groups. Three research instruments were used to collect data; communication tasks, field notes and interviews. Data analysis revealed that there is no significant difference in the frequency of negotiation of meaning between the two task types. This is due to the fact that, learners performed both task types as unfocused tasks and they were able to use some communication strategies to keep communication flowing and to go round the target structure. Amazingly, despite the existence of the trigger of negotiation, the indicator of misunderstanding, an important negotiation phase, was absent in many cases from the conversations in both task types. Subsequently, the research findings suggest providing learners with opportunities that urge them to perform as language users rather than language learners.

 


Keywords


Communication; focused communication tasks; unfocused communication tasks; negotiation of meaning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allwright, D. (1998). Negotiation of Meaning. In k. Johnson &H Johnson (Eds), Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Al-Sibai,D.(2004). Promoting Oral Fluency of Second Language Learners. Educational Linguistics. Department of English. King Saud University.

Blake, R. (2000). Computer Mediated Communication. A Window on L2 Spanish Interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136.

Branden, K. (1997). Effects of Negotiation on Language Learners' Output. Language Learning, 47(4) 589-636.

Celce-Murcia M., Dörnyei Z., &Thurrell S. (1995). A pedagogical Framework for Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35.

Cheon,H.(2003). The Viability of Computer Mediated Communication in the Korean Secondary EFL Classroom. Asian EFL Journal, 5 (1), ISSN: 1738-1460.

Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Essex, UK, Longman.

Ellis, R. (1988). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task – Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H.,& Loewen, S.(2002). Doing Focus- on-Form. System, 30, 419-432.

Gass, S. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

Gass, S,. & Varounis, E. (1994). Input, Interaction and Second Language Production.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 16, 283-302.

Haozhang, X. (1997). Tape Recorders, Role-Plays, and Turn-Taking in Large EFL Listening and Speaking Classes. China, 35(3), 33.

Harmer, J. (1982).What Is Communicative?. ELT Journal, 36(3), 164-168.

Holiday, A. (2002). Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. London, SAGE Publications.

Holiday, L. (1995). Net worked and Non-Networked Computers and Communicative Approaches to ESL Teaching. Online document. Retrieved from:http: //www. Latrobe. edu.au/esucation/lh/klabook/htm

Jeremy, S. (2010). Pre-Task Syntactic Priming and Focused Task Design. ELT Journal. Oxford journals, 29, 165-174.

Kramsch, C.J. (1986) From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70. 366-372.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, Pergamon Press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods. London. Yale University Press.

Littlewood, W. (1984). Foreign and Second Language Learning. Cambridge. Cambridge University press.

Long, M. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In W.Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Second Language Acquisition. New York, Academic. 413- 468.

Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Theory, Research and Practice. In C. Doughty & J.Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. 15- 41.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 19, 37-66.

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, Interaction and Second Language Development. An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.21, 557-587.

Ministry of Education, (2009). English For Me, Teacher's Book (10 B). Ministry of Education. Oman.

Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused Communication Talks and Second language Acquisition. ELT Journal, 47(3), 203-210.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Pellettieri, J. (1999). Negotiation in cyberspace. In M.Warschauer, M. & K. Kern (eds), Network Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pica, T. (1994). Research on Negotiation: What Does it Reveal about Second Language Learning Conditions, Processes and Outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3). 493-527.

Pica, T,. Holiday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D., & Newman, J., (1991). Language Learning through Interaction. What Role Does Gender Play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-376.

Pica, T., Young, R. Doughty, C. (1987). The Impact of Interaction on Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 731-758.

Scrivener, J. (1994). Learning teaching. UK. Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Shehadeh, A. (2005). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching: Theories and Applications. Retrieved November 14, 2010, from: http://www.palgrave.com/pdfs/ 1403945578.pdf.

Shuttleworth, M. (2009). Repeated Measures Design. Retrieved November 17. 2011 from: Experiment Resources: http://www.experiment-resources.com/repeated-measures- design.html.

Varonis, E. & Gass, S. (1985b) Non native/Non Native Conversations: A model for Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 71-90.

Willis, J. (1996). A frame work for task- based learning. Pearson Education Limited.

Zhang, S. (2009). The Role of Input, Interaction and Output in the Development of Oral Fluency. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 91-100.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.1p.215

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.