Music Theory Literacy of Individuals Receiving Amateur Piano Education

Sezer Dinçer

Abstract


In this study, the level of musical literacy acquisition of individuals who receive self-engage piano education was examined. It is thought that there is an ambiguity between the piano playing ability of individuals who receive self-engage piano education and the development of their music literacy. The aim of the study is to reveal the music theory literacy levels of these individuals and their differences according to various variables. The research was conducted with a descriptive survey model. The study focused on individuals who receive amateur piano education, and the data were collected through literature review, demographic information form and “Music Theory Literacy Scale”. A total of 124 individuals who did not receive professional music education (amateur) participated in the study. A 17-question test was developed to determine music theory literacy. As a result of the study, it was seen that the music theory literacy levels of individuals who received amateur piano education were at an intermediate level. While the participants were highly successful in the questions involving knowledge of note values, they failed in the question involving knowledge of basic tone in music.

Keywords


Music Education, Music Theory Literacy, Piano Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afacan, Ş., & Kaya, E.E. (2019). Investigation of art literacy status of fine arts faculty music department students. The Journal of International Lingual, Social and Educational Sciences, 5(2), 204-214.https://doi.org/10.34137/jilses.605559

Aslan, L., & Deniz, J. (2011). İlköğretim mezunu öğrencilerin müzik okuryazarlik düzeyleri. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 34(34), 25-34.

Aydınlı Gürler, D., & Kaynak Akçaoğlu, T. (2021). Güzel sanatlar fakültesi müzik bölümü öğrencilerinin sanat okuryazarlığı düzeylerinin ve belirli değişkenlerle ilişkisinin incelenmesi. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 86, 191-208.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., & Çakmak, E. K. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri.

Gardner, H. (2004). Zihin çerçeveleri çoklu zeka kuramı. Alfa Yayınları.

Hallam, S. (1998). Instrumental teaching. Heinemann Educational Publishers.

Karasar, N. (1994). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Karasar, N. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. (8. Basım). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araĢtırma yöntemleri. Nobel.

Kurtaslan Yıldırım, H. (2017). Evaluation of art literacy levels of students who study in fine arts high school in terms of variables. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 70, 39-56.

Köseoğlu, F., Atasoy, B., Kavak, N., Akkuş, H., Budak, E.,

Tümay, H., Kadayıfçı, H., & Taşdelen, U. (2003). Yapılandırıcı öğrenme ortamı için: Bir müzik ders kitabı nasıl olmalı, Asil Yayın Dağıtım.

Mentiş Köksoy, A. (2018). Investigation of Art Literacy Levels of Fine Arts Education Students. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(8), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3517

Özer, B. (2018). Güzel Sanatlar Fakültelerindeki Öğrencilerin Sanat Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 73, 441- 450. https://doi.org/10.34137/jilses.605559

Yücetoker, İ. (2015). Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Öğrencilerinin Sanat okuryazarlığı Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 62, 669-676.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.12n.4p.202

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.