Opinions of Students Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language on the Use of E-Portfolio in Writing Lessons

Ramazan Eryılmaz

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the opinions of students learning Turkish as a foreign language on the use of the e-portfolio method in writing classes. During the implementation phase of this case study, two methods were used concurrently. The first method was face-to-face instruction centered on the coursebook. The second method was the e-portfolio method utilizing digital tools. After the implementation, data regarding the participants’ opinions were collected through interview technique, and the collected data were analyzed through content analysis. According to the research findings, there is a diversity of opinions among students regarding digital writing practices. Generation Z students tend to evaluate digital writing more positively. Language control and support are positively received by students. It has been observed that digital writing offers spatial and temporal independence, enhances student-teacher and student-student interaction, and contributes to collaboration and skill development in the context of peer learning. It is concluded that digital writing increases learning motivation and generally improves Turkish writing skills. As a teaching tool, in addition to textbooks and notebooks, the use of digital resources, especially e-portfolio creation tools and dictionaries, which offer unlimited variety, has become a necessity. Based on the study results, it is recommended to use a hybrid approach where traditional and digital writing-based e-portfolio methods are used together in education. Accordingly, curriculum should be updated, digital tools should be used more effectively, and technology infrastructure should be improved. Centers or courses teaching Turkish as a foreign language should take the initiative for infrastructure improvements. In this context, it is recommended that researchers in the field of online teaching of writing, speaking, listening, and reading skills conduct studies and educators develop applications.

Keywords


Foreign Language, Turkish, Digital, Writing, E-Portfolio

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afdalia, T., Mirza, A. A., & Widiastuty, H. (2023). An analysis of students’ writing anxiety and strategies used in writing English journal article. Journal Of English Language Teaching And Literature, 4(2), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v4i2.185

Akgün, E., & Kölemen, C. Ş. (2020). The impact of creating e-portfolios on students’ academic self-regulation skills. Journal of National Education, 49(227), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.47673/MEJ.2020.49.227.117-140

Altunbay, M., & Bıçak, N. (2018). Türkçe eğitimi derslerinde “Z kuşağı” bireylerine uygun teknoloji tabanlı uygulamaların kullanımı. Journal of the World of Turks, 10(1), 127-142. Retrieved from https://zfwt.org/index.php/ZfWT/article/view/1015/1015

Anagün, Ş. S., Atalay, N., & Kandemir, C. M. (2018). E-Portfolio implementation experiences of prospective primary school teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 102-124. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.397652

Aydın, E. (2019). Türkçe öğretiminde dijital hikâye anlatımının yaratıcı yazma becerisine etkisi (Doctoral the sis). Malatya: İnönü University, Institute of Educational Sciences. Retrieved from http://abakus.inonu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11616/18260

Battelle for Kids. (2019). Retrieved from Network: https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks

Chantanarungpak, K. (2015). Using e-Portfolio on social media. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1275-1281. Retrieved from https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/277811/1-s2.0-S1877042815X0022X/1-s2.0-S187704281502323X/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjECQaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJGMEQCIG7Ejzd9coJjWLEcHF%2BLoRAkALwqbiPiV5oRLb

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Political Science.

Çetinkaya, S. (2022). Dijital çağda yazma eğitimi. I. International Azerbaijan Academic Research Congress, (pp. 185-191). Baku. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361505508_Dijital_Cagda_Yazma_Egitimi

Erten, P. (2015). Çevrimiçi işbirlikli öğrenme ortamında e-portfolyo uygulamasının akademik başarıya, tutumlara, motivasyona ve kalıcılığa etkisi [Master’s Thesis]. Fırat University, Institute of Educational Sciences. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=nA1NPwuEgyVqk6AxA0ikFw&no=Bt2DxAp9yAlUzRVk8VEa8Q

Gupta, A., & Pathania, P. (2021). To study the impact of Google Classroom as a platform of learning and collaboration at the teacher education level. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10294-1

Güngör, H., Çangal, Ö., & Demir, T. (2020). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak uzaktan öğretimine ilişkin öğrenici ve öğretici görüşleri. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 40(3), 1163-1191. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.756612

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. (2016). Qualitative Data Analysis (A. Ç. Kılınç, D. Örücü, Y. Samur, A. Ersoy, & S. G. Mazman, Trans.). Pegem.

Im, H. J., & Lee, Y. L. (2022). The effects of Padlet use on writing anxiety and strategy use in online English writing learning. Journal of Digital Convergence, 20(5), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.5.069

Kan, A. (2007). Portfolio assessment. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(32), 133-144. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/585-published.pdf

Küçükaydın, M. A., & Ulum, H. (2023). The effects of Web 2.0 supported environmental education on self-efficacy belief regarding environmental education and environmental awareness. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11783-9

Kvale, S. (1994). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.

Lam, R. (2023). E-Portfolios: What we know, what we don’t, and what we need to know. RELC Journal, 54(1), 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220974102

Lee, S., & Rabu, S. (2022). Google docs for higher education: Evaluating online interaction and reflective writing using a content analysis approach. Education and Information Technologies, 27 (1), 3651–3681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10760-4

Malihehe, B., & Mereseini, T. (2013). E-portfolios: A new trend in formative writing assessment. International Journal of Modern Education Forum, 2(2), 49-56. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255731028_E-portfolios_A_New_Trend_in_Formative_Writing_Assessment#fullTextFileContent

McGrail, E., & Davis, A. (2011). The influence of classroom blogging on elementary student writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(4), 415-437.

Merriam, S. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (Collective, Trans.). Nobel.

Okur, U., & Gürlek, M. (2022).). Kovid-19 salgını sonrası yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde çevrimiçi modeller: Ankara Üniversitesi TÖMER Örneği. Journal of Linguistics, 5(39), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.26650/jol.2022.1213471

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Pegem.

Paulsaon, F.L., Paulson, P.R. & Meyer, C.A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a Portfolio. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 50-63. Retrieved from https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199102_paulson.pdf

Sarıgül, K. (2021). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretiminde çevrim içi süreç değerlendirme araçları. Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Faculty of Arts, 4, 56-80. https://doi.org/10.47948/efad.922748

Şimşek, Y. (2005). Sosyal bilgiler programı ve öğretimi. Eğitimde yansımalar. Proceedings of the VIII Symposium on the Evaluation of New Elementary School Programs, (pp. 329-342).

Yamaç, A. (2018). A general overview of new literacy: Some suggestions for decision-makers, researchers, and teachers. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 11(3), 383-410. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.370469

Zunaidah, A. (2022). Meaningful online learning with e-portfolio: University students’ perspectives. 8th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET), (pp. 228-232). Malang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET56879.2022.9990059.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.4p.85

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.