Role of Prosodic Reading in Listening Comprehension

H. Kagan Keskin, Gökhan Arı, Muhammet Baştuğ

Abstract


This study aims to determine how listening comprehension levels of students are affected by listening to prosodic and non-prosodic readings vocalized by a computer and human. Third-grade students of four different classes at a primary school were randomly selected in a city center in the Western Black Sea Region of Turkey to participate in the study (n=91). Four equivalent classes formed the listening groups of the research in listening comprehension. The groups were (1) the group listening to the model prosodic reading, (2) the group listening to the computer prosodic reading, (3) the group listening to the model non-prosodic reading, and (4) the group listening to the computer non-prosodic reading. Two stories were used in the measurement of listening comprehension, and comprehension skills were measured with open-ended questions. The data obtained were analyzed with the Kruskal Wallis and Conover–Iman tests. Logistic Regression Analysis (LRA) was performed to reinforce the results and increase distinctiveness. According to the results, inferential comprehension scores of the students who listened to the prosodically-vocalized texts differed from other groups significantly. Meanwhile, literal comprehension scores of all students in the listening groups did not differ. The LRA results indicated that the inferential comprehension scores were a significant predictor of the listening groups. Consequently, the relationship between prosody and inferential comprehension was found to be significant in this study. The results also showed that it is necessary to attach particular importance to prosody in listening activities and to use prosodic models suitable for students in reading activities in the early grades of the primary school.

Keywords


Listening Comprehension, Prosody, Non-prosody, Oral Reading, Literal, Inferential, Literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık Ltd. Şti.

Akyol, H. (2011). Türkçe öğretim yöntemleri (Yeni programa uygun) (4 ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

Anderson, J. R. (2009). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth Publishers.

Ateşman, E. (1997). Türkçede Okunabilirliğin Ölçülmesi. Dil Dergisi, 58, 71-74.

Baştuğ, M. (2012). İlköğretim birinci kademe öğrencilerinin akıcı okuma becerilerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Baştuğ, M., & Keskin, H. K. (2012). The Relationship between Fluent Reading Skills and Comprehension Level (Literal and Inferential). Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 227-244.

Breznitz, Z. (2006). Fluency in Reading: synchronization of processes. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Conover, W. J., & Iman, R. L. (1979). On multiple-comparisons procedures. Retrieved from

Çetinkaya, F. Ç., Ateş, S., & Yıldırım, K. (2016). Prozodik Okumanın Aracılık Etkisi: Lise Düzeyinde Okuduğunu Anlama Ve Akıcı Okuma Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi Turkish Studies, 11(3), 809-820. doi:10.7827/TurkishStudies.9339

Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in Favor of a Broad Framework for Pronunciation Instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393-410. doi:doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00047

Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 389-406.

Dowhower, S. L. (1991). Speaking of Prosody: Fluency's Unattended Bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 165-175.

Duke, N. K., & Carlisle, J. (2011). The development of comprehension. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 199-227). New York: Routledge.

EBA. (2016). Eğitim Bilişim Ağı-Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Retrieved from http://www.eba.gov.tr/ses/dinle/0a05e313f3b3349554c40b138630714023009bc35c006

Erekson, J. A. (2010). Prosody and Interpretation. Reading Horizons, 50(2), 80-98.

Gordon, J., Darcy, I., & Ewert, D. (2013). Pronunciation teaching and learning: Effects of explicit phonetic instruction in the L2 classroom. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 194-206). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

Hawkins, R. O., Marsicano, R., Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., & Musti-Rao, S. (2015). Comparing the Efficiency of Repeated Reading and Listening-While-Reading to Improve Fluency and Comprehension. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(1), 49-70.

IBM Corp. (Released 2015). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 23.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Jackson, C. N., & O'Brien, M. G. (2011). The Interaction between Prosody and Meaning in Second Language Speech Production. Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, 44(1), 1-11. doi:10.1111/j.1756-1221.2011.00087.x

John, F. (2005). Intelligibility and the Listener: The Role of Lexical Stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399-423. doi:doi:10.2307/3588487

Kang, S. (2007). Effects of prosody and context on the comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in English and Korean. (PhD), The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1166827417

Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee? Cogn Psychol, 50(2), 194-231. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.08.002

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Morris, R. D., Mandel Morrow, L., Gee Woo, D., Meisinger, E. B., . . . Stahl, S. A. (2006). Teaching Children to Become Fluent and Automatic Readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(4), 357-387. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_1

Leech, N., Barrett, K., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation (2 ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lehto, J. E., & Anttila, M. (2003). Listening Comprehension in Primary Level Grades Two, Four and Six. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 133-143. doi:10.1080/00313830308615

Milosky, L. M., & Ford, J. A. (1997). The role of prosody in children's inferences of ironic intent. Discourse Processes, 23(1), 47-61. doi:10.1080/01638539709544981

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Nat Read Panel.

Nygaard, L. C., Herold, D. S., & Namy, L. L. (2009). The Semantics of Prosody: Acoustic and Perceptual Evidence of Prosodic Correlates to Word Meaning. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 127-146. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01007.x

O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening Comprehension Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437. doi:10.1093/applin/10.4.418

Ofuka, E., McKeown, J. D., Waterman, M. G., & Roach, P. J. (2000). Prosodic cues for rated politeness in Japanese speech. Speech Communication, 32(3), 199-217. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00009-1

Özbay, M. (2005). Sesle ilgili kavramlar ve konuşma eğitimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 33(168).

Öztürk, H. (2016). 3. Sınıf Türkçe Etkinlikler. Retrieved from www.halisalkaya.com.tr

Poelmans, P. (2003). Developing second-language listening comprehension: Effects of training lower-order skills versus higher-order strategy Universiteit van Amsterdam. ( 90-76864-36-5 )

Pohlert, T. (2016). PMCMR: Calculate Pairwise Multiple Comparisons of Mean Rank Sums (Version 4.1).

Purdy, M. (1997). What is listening? . In M. Purdy & D. Borisoff (Eds.), Listening in Everyday Life: A Personal and Professional Approach. Laitham: University Press of America.

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.4.1). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/

Rasinski, T. (2006). Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity and prosody. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 704-706.

Schafer, A. J. (1997). Prosodic parsing: The role of prosody in sentence comprehension. (PhD.), University of Massachusetts Amherst. (AAI9809396)

Schafer, A. J., Speer, S., & Warren, P. (2005). Prosodic influences on the production and comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in a game-based conversation task. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the action and product traditions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a Fluent Reader: Reading Skill and Prosodic Features in the Oral Reading of Young Readers. J Educ Psychol., 96(1), 119-129. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119

Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Ruston, H. P. (2008). Becoming a Fluent Reader from Theory to Practice. In M. R. Kuhn & P. J. Schwanenflugel (Eds.), Fluency in the Classroom. New York: The Guilford Press.

Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing Fluency in the Context of Effective Literacy Instruction. In T. Rasinski, C. Blanchowicz, & K. Lems (Eds.), Fluency Instruction. New York: The Guilford Press Inc.

Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. J Mem Lang, 48(1), 103-130. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00519-3

TTKB. (2016). Türkçe Dersi (1-8. sınıflar) Öğretim Programı. Retrieved from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=332

Tura, R. (2017). Türkçe Seslendir (Version 0.9): www.rtsoftpro.com.

Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2014). The role of speech prosody and text reading prosody in children's reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 521-536. doi:10.1111/bjep.12036

Warren, P., Schafer, A. J., Speer, S. R., & White, S. D. (2000). Prosodic resolution of prepositional phrase ambiguity in ambiguous and unambiguous situations. 99, 5-33.

Yenkimaleki, M., & Heuven, V. J. v. (2016). Effect of explicit teaching of prosodic features on the development of listening comprehension by farsi-english interpreter trainees: An experimental study. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(6), 32-41. doi:10.1080/23306343.2016.1233930

Yıldırım, K., & Ateş, S. (2011). Prozodi: Anlamayı yordayan yükselen bir değer mi? Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 15, 143-160.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.1p.59

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.