Assessing Iranian Student-Teachers’ Problem-Solving Ability: A Comparison between Conventional and Problem-Based Assessment

Hamid Ashraf, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Javad Gh. Domsky

Abstract


The advent of problem-based assessment has opened the question of whether or not conventional approaches to assessment are truly a representative of students’ knowledge (Lampert, 2001). In an attempt to find out about the suitability of problem-based tests in evaluating student-teachers’ knowledge of teaching English, a problem-based test was designed and administered to 33 MA students who were selected through the quota approach at Payame Noor University. Comparison of the results of the problem-based test and conventional test through paired-samples t-test revealed that teacher-students gained higher scores in the conventional tests; however, the results of the semi-structured interview with the participants revealed that they considered problem-based test a true measure of their knowledge and favored it over conventional assessment due to its relevance to content and context of the course, its motivating nature, and its dynamic structure. This study can have pedagogical implications for language teachers and material developers.


Keywords


Problem-based learning, problem-based assessment, students-teacher, English language teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansarian, L., Adlipour, A. A., Saber, M. A., & Shafiei, E. (2016). The Impact of Problem-Based Learning on Iranian EFL Learners’ Speaking Proficiency. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), 84-94.

Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481-486.

Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem Based Learning. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Boud, d., & Feletti, G. (1997). The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed.) London: Kogan Page.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. CA: Sage Publication.

Farhady, H., Jafarpoor, A., & Birjandi, P. (1994). Language skills testing: From theory to practice. Tehran, Iran: SAMT.

Hays, R., & Gupta, T. S. (2003). Ruralising medical curricula: The importance of context in problem design. Australia Journal of Rural Health, 11, 15-17

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266.

Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R Model: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning, 1(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1006

Koschmann, T., Glenn, P., & Conlee, M. (1999). Theory presentation and assessment in a problem- based learning group. Discourse Processes, 27, 119-133.

Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell, & E.H. Van Zee (eds.), Inquiring Into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science (pp.283-315). Washingtion, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Kwan, C. Y., & Lee, M. C. (2009). Problem-based learning (PBL): Concept, application, experiences and lessons. Taiwan: Elsevier.

Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching and the problems of teaching, CT: Yale University Press, New Haven.

Larsson, J. (2001). Problem-Based Learning: A possible approach to language education? Polonia Institute, Jagiellonian University. Retrieved on 5 May 2017 from http://www.nada.kth.se/~jla/docs/PBL.pdf

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 3.

Waters, R., & McCracken, M. (1997, November). Assessment and evaluation in problem-based learning. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, 2, 689-693.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.3p.41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2013-2024 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.

International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies  

You may require to add the 'aiac.org.au' domain to your e-mail 'safe list’ If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox'. Otherwise, you may check your 'Spam mail' or 'junk mail' folders.