The Impact of Task Complexity and Strategic Planning Time on EFL Learners’ Accuracy and Fluency in Written Task Production

Asghar Salimi, Parviz Alavinia, Parvin Hosseini, Ali Shafaei

Abstract


The past twenty years has witnessed a remarkable increase in the number of studies investigating different aspects and features of tasks in the second and foreign language class and their effects on learners’ oral and written task performance. Building up on a review of the studies conducted in the field of task-based language teaching a gap was revealed in the literature on the joint effects of task complexity and types of pre-task planning on L2 learners’ performance. The present study investigates the effects of strategic pre-task planning time and task complexity on a group of L2 learners’ written performance in terms of accuracy and fluency. The means of accuracy and fluency of 50 intermediate English language learners, both male and female, chosen randomly from Iran National Language Institute, Miandoab Branch were compared using T-test as the statistical means of analysis. The findings revealed a positive influence of pre-task strategic planning time in both simple and complex tasks, suggesting significant implications for syllabus and task designers, language teachers, and SLA researchers.

 


Keywords


Task-based language teaching, Planning time, Strategic planning, Task complexity, Accuracy, Fluency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, A. and Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arent, R. (2003). Promoting revision and development in L2 writing through a combination- based curriculum. The Korea TESOL Journal, 6(1), 1-26.

Breen, M. P. (2001). Syllabus design. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp.151-159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brindley, J. (1987). Factors affecting task difficulty. In D. Nunan, (Ed.), Guidelines for the development of curriculum resource (pp.45-56). Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Center.

Brown, R., and Bellugi, U. (1964). 'Three processes in the child's acquisition of syntax'. Harvard Educational Review, 34, 133-151.

Brown, G., and Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language: an approach based on the analysis of conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (2001). 'Introduction' in M.Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.

Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In Candlin, C. and Murphy, D. (Eds.), Language Learning Tasks (pp.5-22). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Clark, H., and Clark, G. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383.

Dadashpour, S. (2011). The Effects of Task Complexity on EFL Learners' Written Performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh Branch, Maragheh, Iran.

Das, J. P., Kar, B. C., and Parrilla, R. K, (1996). Cognitive planning: the psychological basis of intelligent behavior. New Delhi: Sage.

Elder, C., and Wigglesworth, G. (2003). An investigation of the effectiveness and validity of planning time in Part 2 of the IELTS Speaking Test. IELTS Research Reports, 6, 1-28.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R (Ed.) (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19 (3), 229-246.

Ellis, R., and Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second ALnaguge Acquisition, 26, 59-84.

Foster, P., and Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12-20.

Foster, P., and Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215-247.

Gilabert, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Barcelona, Spain.

Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215-240.

Givon, T. (1989). Mind, code, and context. essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hosseini, P. and Rahimpour, M. (2010). The Impact of Task Complexity on L2 Learners' Written Narratives, CCSE, 3 (3), 198-205.

Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effects of task complexity and language proficiency on task- based language performance. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(4), 193-225.

Philp, J., Oliver, R., and Mackey, A. (2006). The impact of planning time on children’s task-based interactions. System, 34, 547-565.

Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37,254-268.

Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 261-284.

Kuiken, F., and Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 48-60.

Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intension to articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp.77-99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Long, M. (Ed.) (2007) .Problems in SLA, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Long, M., and Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27-56.

Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83-108.

Mehrang, F. and Rahimpour, M. (2010). The impact of task structure and planning conditions on oral performance of EFL learners. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3678-3686.

Meisel, J. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In C. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp.206-224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.

Pieneman, M. (1985). 'Learnability and syllabus construction in K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds.): Modeling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford university press.

Rahimpour, M. (1997). Task complexity, task condition, and variation in L2 oral discourse. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.

Rahimpour, M. (1999). Task complexity and variation in interlanguage. In N. O. Jungheim&P. Robinson (Eds.), Pragmatic and pedagogy: proceeding of the3rd pacific Second Language Research Forum (pp.115-134). Tokyo, Japan: Pac LRF.

Rahimpour, M. (2002). Factors affecting task difficulty. Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tarbiat Moallem University, 9(33), 1-16.

Rahimpour, M. (2008). Implementation of task-based approaches to language teaching. Pazhuhesh-e-Zabanha-ye Khareji Journal, University of Tehran, 41, 45-61.

Rahimpour, M. (2010). Current trends on syllabus design in FL instruction. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1660-64.

Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45(1), 99-140.

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework, Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.

Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45-105.

Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1-32.

Robinson, P. (2007). Triadic framework for TBLT: Task complexity, task difficulty, and task condition. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 195-225.

Robinson, P., Chi-chien Ting, S. and Urwin, J. (1995). Investigating second language task complexity. RELC, 26, 62-78.

Salimi, A. and Dadashpour, S. (2010). Task complexity and L2 learners' written performance. A paper presented at WCCES 14. Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey, 14-18 June.

Salimi, A. and Dadashpour, S. (2012a). Task complexity and SL development: Does task complexity matter? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 726-735.

Salimi, A. and Dadashpour, S. (2012b). Task Complexity and Language Production Dilemmas (Robinson's Cognition Hypothesis vs. Skehan's Trade-off Model). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 643-652.

Salimi, A., Dadashpour, S., and Asadollahfam, H. (2011). The Effect of Task Complexity on EFL learners' written performance. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1390–1399.

Salimi, A., Shafaei, A. and Kuhi, D. (2011). The Impact of the generic features of tasks on L2 learners’ written production. A Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 653-662.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shafaei, A. (2012). The effect of generic features of task on L2 learners’ oral performance in EFL context. Unpublished master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh Branch, Maragheh, Iran.

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction.Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. and Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120.

Tavakoli, P., and Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: the effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439-473.

Tavakoli, p., and Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239 – 277). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 143-63.

Wang, Y, (2008). Influence of Planning on Students’ Language Performance in Task-based Language Teaching. English language Teaching, 1 (1), 83-86.

Yuan, F. (2001). The effects of planning on language production in task-based language teaching. Doctoral thesis, Temple University.

Yuan, F., and Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monolgic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24 (1), 1-27.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.7p.104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.