Evaluation of High School English Textbooks: “English for Afghanistan” based on McDonough and Shaw’s (2003) Model
Abstract
The textbook is an integral component of the ELT classroom. They need to be evaluated periodically, as the needs of learners change according to time, context, and approaches to identify their strengths and weakness. The aim of this research is to evaluate High School English textbooks at schools in Afghanistan. The textbooks include ELT books: ‘English for Afghanistan: for grades 10-12’ designed by the Ministry of Education of Afghanistan. For this purpose, the researcher used McDonough & Shaw’s (2003) model. Both the external and the internal evaluation criteria are applied to the textbooks. The findings indicate that the textbooks are designed for local purposes, which reflect Afghan religious and cultural values. The study also indicated that the textbooks are based on communicative language teaching which includes different situations for teaching the topics. However, the textbooks also had some drawbacks. The listening skill, which is the main component of the CLT approach, is completely neglected; the grammar activities are brought in the deductive approach, and the textbooks are gender-biased. Overall, the textbooks are up to date and meet the learners’ needs and wants, and can achieve the objectives made for each unit. However, the findings of the research can be more useful for teachers, syllabus designers, materials developers, methodology experts, and test designers in revising the textbooks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alimyar, Z. (2015). Teaching English as a foreign language in Afghanistan. Cheragh-e-Hekmat Quarterly Academic and Research Journal.
Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we Want Teaching Materials for?. ELT journal, 36(1), 5-18.
Azizifar, A., Koosha, M., & Lotfi, A. R. (2010). An analytical Evaluation of Iranian High School ELT Textbooks from 1970 to the Present. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 36-44.
Brown, J. D. (2001). Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge University Press.
Cirocki, A. (2010). Age is Only a Number: Evaluating and Modernising Dated EFL Materials. In MATSDA Folio, 14(2).
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heienemann.
Demir, Y., Ertas , A.(2014). Suggested Eclectic Checklist for ELT Coursebook Evaluation, The Reading Matrix,14(2), 243-252,
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA Research and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farzaneh, N., Kohandani, M., & Nejadansari, D. (2014). A textbook evaluation of Socio-cultural Contexts in Top Notch Series. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 472-481.
Harwood, N.(2005). What do we Want EAP Teaching Materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes,4 ,149–161
Hutchison, T. & Torres E. (1994): English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kachru, B. B. (1986). The Alchemy of English: The Spread Functions and Models of Non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kachru, B. B. (1992). The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Kazimi, F., Ludin, G. R., Mushtaq, S. N., and Zaynal, J. (2010), English for Afghanistan: Grade 10. Ministry of Education.
Kazimi, F., Ludin, G. R., Mushtaq, S. N., and Zaynal, J. (2010), English for Afghanistan: Grade 11. Ministry of Education.
Kazimi, F., Ludin, G. R., Mushtaq, S. N., and Zaynal, J. (2010), English for Afghanistan: Grade 12. Ministry of Education.
Khodabakhshi, M. (2014). Choose a proper EFL textbook: Evaluation of “Skyline” Series. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 959-967.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Prentice-Hall International
McDonough, J and Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and Methods in ELT: a Teacher’s Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Mukundan, J. & Ahour, T. (2010). A Review of Textbook Evaluation Checklists Across Four Decades (1970-2008). In Tomlinson, B., Masuhara, H. (Eds.). Research for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice (pp. 336-352). London: Continuum.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., and Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C.(2005). Materials Development and Research: Making the Connection. Paper Presented at a Colloquium on Research and Materials Development at the TESOL Convention, San Antonio.
Sheldon L. 1988. Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246. doi:10.1093/elt/42.4.237.
Thornbury, S., & Meddings, L. (2001). Coursebooks: The Roaring in the Chimney. Modern English Teacher,10(3), 11–13.
Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H. and Rubdy, R. (2001). EFL Courses for Adults. ELT Journal, 55 (1), 80–101.
Tomlinson, B. 2001. Materials Development. In Carter, R. and Nunan, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing Materials for Language Learning. London: Continuum.
Vasiljevic, Z. (2011). The Predictive Evaluation of Language Learning Tasks. English language Teaching. 4(1).
Wahab, M. A. (2013). Developing an English Language Textbook Evaluative Checklist. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(3), 55–70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.11n.2p.72
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.