Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Test-taking Strategies and Performance on Reading Comprehension Tests by Iranian EFL Learners
Abstract
This study attempted to explore the possible relationship between test-taking strategies and (a) successful performance on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading comprehension, (b) EFL learners’ level of language proficiency. To accomplish the purpose of this study, 68 students of English translation of both genders were randomly selected and placed in the three Beginner, Intermediate and Advanced levels, at Alborz Institute for Higher Education, Qazvin, Iran. Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) proved that there was a significant and positive correlation between the scores in reading comprehension test and Oxford Placement Test. While the scores in reading comprehension test did not show any significant correlations with using the majority of test-taking strategies, they had a relatively low and negative but significant correlation with test management strategy. The findings in this study were interpreted as the low knowledge of test-taking strategies in Iranian EFL context and the importance of attending to the cognitive processes effective in taking language tests was emphasized.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Block, E. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly. 26(2), pp. 319-343.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Press.
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills (3rd ed.). United States: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
Cohen, A. D. (2009a). The coming of age of research on test-taking strategies. Retrieved from http://www.tc.umn.edu/~adcohen/Cohen%20articles/2006%20-%20Test-Taking%20Strategies%20LAQ.pdf>
Cohen, A. D. (2009b). Coming to terms with language learner strategies: What do strategy experts think about the terminology and where would they direct their research? Retrieved from http://www.crie.org.nz/research_paper/Andrew%20Cohen%20WP12.pdf
Cohen, A. D. & Upton, T.A. (2007). I want to go back to the text: Response strategies on the reading subtest of the New TOEFL. Language Testing. 24(3), pp. 209-250.
Cubuku, F. (2010) How to enhance reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Retrieved from http://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/cilt1/sayi2/sayi2pdf/cubukcu_feryal.pdf
Fewell, N. (2010). Language learning strategies and English language proficiency: an investigation of Japanese EFL university students. Retrieved from http://www.tesol-journal.com/PDF/A11V2_TESOL.pdf
Hirano, K. (2009). Research on test-taking strategies in L2 reading. Retrieved from http://www.lib.juen.ac.jp/db/14_hira.pdf
Imtiaz, Sh. (2010). Metacognitive strategies of reading among ESL learners. Retrieved from http://salr.net/Documents/Shagufta.pdf
Oxford, R. L. (2010). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Retrieved from http://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf
Phakiti, A. (2010a). Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationships to EFL reading test performance. Retrieved from http://www.ltrc.unimelb.edu.au/mplt/papers/11_1_4_Phakiti.pdf
Phakiti, A. (2010b). Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Retrieved from http://202.197.121.116/Downloads/LangTst/tst_006.pdf
Verezub, E. & Wang, H. (2010). The role of metacognitive reading strategies instructions and various types of links in comprehending hypertext. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/verezub.pdf
Wurr, A. J. (2003). Reading in a second language: A reading problem or a language problem? Journal of College Reading and Learning. 33(2), pp. 157-170.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.2p.138
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.