An Investigation of Suicide Notes: An ESP Genre Analysis

Atekah Abaalkhail

Abstract


Suicide notes are considered important texts used to understand the suicidal act. Most studies focused on these notes psychologically to test hypothesis. Less research has been done discursively from the perspective of language studies. The purpose of this study is to investigate suicide notes, written by English speaking males and females between the years 1945-1954 and 1983-1984, from the perspective of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) genre approach. Specifically, the study examines the communicative purpose(s) and the rhetorical move/step structure in a corpus of 86 suicide notes. The findings suggest that suicide notes share common communicative purposes and rhetorical structure, and, therefore, constitute a genre from the ESP perspective. By examining the rhetorical move structure of suicide notes, this study proposes a model of suicide notes structure, the moves writers use and suggests that suicide notes do constitute a genre without a visible discourse community. The study adds to the existing body of knowledge in genre theory and makes a theoretically based contribution to the fields of genre studies, suicidology, and, potentially, forensic linguistics.

Keywords


Suicide Notes, ESP, Genre, Move Analysis, Occluded Genre, Communicative Purpose

Full Text:

PDF

References


Askehave, I., & Swales, J. M. (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied linguistics, 22(2), 195-212.

Bennell, C., Jones, N. J., & Taylor, A. (2011). Determining the authenticity of suicide notes: Can training improve human judgment? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 669-689.

Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Biber, D., Upton, T., & Connor, U. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Black, S. T. (1993). Comparing genuine and simulated suicide notes: A new perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 699-702.

Black, S. T., & Lester, D. (2003). The content of suicide notes: Does it vary by method of suicide, sex, or age? OMEGA, 46(3), 241-249.

Chaski, C. (2001). Empirical evaluations of language-based author identification techniques. Forensic Linguistics, 8(1), 1-65.

Chia, B. H., Chia, A., & Tai, B. C. (2008). Suicide letters in Singapore. Archives of Suicide Research, 12(1), 74-81.

Chiang, E., & Grant, T. (2017). Online grooming: Moves and strategies. Language and Law, 4(1), 103-141.

Conger, A. (1980). Integration and generalization of Kappas for multiple raters. Psychological Bulletin, 88(2), 322-328.

Connor, U. (2000). Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists. Text, 20(1), 1-28.

Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union’s research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 47–62.

Coster, D., & Lester, D. (2013). Last words: Analysis of suicide notes from an RECBT perspective: An exploratory study. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 31(3), 136-151.

Cotterill, J. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in forensic linguistics. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 578-590). New York, NY: Routledge.

Darbonne, A. R. (1969). Suicide and age: A suicide note analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(1), 46-50.

Delgado, K. J. (2013). The role of relationships in completed suicide: A gendered analysis of suicide notes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wright state University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.

Fincham, B., Langer, S., Scourfield, J., & Shiner, M. (2011). Understanding suicide: A sociological autopsy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Freiermuth, M. R. (2011). Text lies and electronic bait: An analysis of email fraud and the decisions of the unsuspecting. Discourse & Communication, 5(2), 123-145.

Galasiński, D. (2017). Discourses of men’s suicide notes: A qualitative analysis. London: Bloomsbury.

Giles, S. (2007). The final farewell: Using a narrative approach to explore suicide notes as ultra-social phenomena. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Liverpool, U.K.

Handelman, L. D., & Lester, D. (2007). The content of suicide notes from attempters and completers. Crisis, 28(1) 102-104.

Hjelmeland, H., & Knizek, B. L. (2010). Why we need qualitative research in suicidology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 40(1), 74-80.

Ho, T. P., Yip, P. S., Chiu, C. W. F., & Halliday, P. (1998). Suicide notes: What do they tell us? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 98(6), 467-473.

Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113-135.

Ioannou, M., & Debowska, A. (2014). Genuine and simulated suicide notes: An analysis of content. Forensic Science International, 245, 151-160.

Joseph, R., Lim, J. M. H., & Nor, N. A. M. (2014). Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 53-69.

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 74-86.

Leenaars, A. A. (1988). Suicide notes: Predictive clues and patterns. New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.

Leenaars, A. A. (1999). Suicide notes in the courtroom. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine 6(1). 39-48.

Linn, M., & Lester, D. (1996). Content differences in suicide notes by gender and age: Serendipitous findings. Psychological Reports, 78, 370-370.

McClelland, L., Reicher, S., & Booth, N. (2000). A last defense: The negotiation of blame within suicide notes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 225-240.

Miller, C. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 57-66). London: Taylor & Francis.

O’Connor, R. C., & Leenaars, A. A. (2004). A thematic comparison of suicide notes drawn from Northern Ireland and the United States. Current Psychology, 22(4), 339-347.

Olson, L. (2005). The use of suicide notes as an aid for understanding motives in completed suicide. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Utah, Utah, USA.

Osgood, C. E., & Walker, E. G. (1959). Motivation and language behavior: A content analysis of suicide notes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(1), 58-67.

Paltridge, B. (1995). Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(4), 393-406.

Paltridge, B. (2013). Genre and English for specific purposes. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 347-366). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Prokofyeva, T. (2013). Language use in two types of suicide texts. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Roubidoux, S. M. (2012). Linguistic manifestations of power in suicide notes: An investigation of personal pronouns. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, WI, USA.

Sadeghi, V., & Samuel, M. (2013). Genre analysis of the letters of appeal. Discourse Studies, 15(2), 229-245.

Samraj, B., & Gawron, J. M. (2015). The suicide note as a genre: Implications for genre theory. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 88-101.

Sanger, S., & Veach, P. M. (2008). The interpersonal nature of suicide: A qualitative investigation of suicide notes. Archives of Suicide Research, 12(4), 352-365.

Shapero, J. J. (2011). The language of suicide notes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.

Shneidman, E. S. (1985). Definition of suicide. New York, NY: Wiley.

Shneidman, E. S., & Farberow, N. L. (1957). Clues to suicide (Eds.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Shneidman. E. S., & Farberow, N. L. (1960). A socio-psychological investigation of suicide. In H. P. David & J. C. Brengelmann (Eds.), Perspectives in personality research (pp. 270-293). New York, NY: Springer.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (1993). Genre and engagement. Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire [Belgian journal of philosophy and history] 71(3), 687-698.

Swales, J. M. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (2011). Navigating academia: Writing supporting genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Upton, T., & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585-605.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.3p.1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.