Features of Arabic and English Use of Self and Other-presentation in Political Discourse
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aitchison, J. (1994). ‘Say, say it again Sam: The Treatment of Repetition in Linguistics.’ In Fischer, Andreas (ed.). Repetition. Tübingen: Gunten Narr Verlag.
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’ in Annual Review of Anthropology (California), 29, 447-466.
Chiltom. P. and Schaffner C. (2002) ‘Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse’, in Chiltom. P. and Schaffner C. (Eds.) Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Declerck, R, and Reed, S. (2001). Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.
Froese, P. (2014). ‘Religion and American Politics from a Global Perspective’ in Religions, vol. 5, 648–662; doi:10.3390/rel5030648
Gao, C and Zheng, Q. (2014). ‘A Linguistic Study of Antonymy in English Texts’ in Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 234-238. doi:10.4304/jltr.5.1.234-238.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hoye, L. (2017). Adverbs and modality in English. Routledge.
Osborn, M. & Osborn, S. (1988). Public Speaking. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Persson, G. (1974) Repetition in English. Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1974.
Richards, I. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, J. (2012). ‘Religious Discourse and the Reinvigoration of American Political Life.’ In Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, Vol. 4. ISSN: 0883-3648
Stiltner, B. and Steven, M. (2009) ‘Religion, Rhetoric, and Running for Office: Public Reason on the US Campaign Trail’ in Nigel B. and Linda H. (Eds.), Religious Voices in Public Places. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. (2007) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’ in Discourse and society, 4, (2), 249-283.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1995). ‘Discourse analysis as ideology analysis’ in Christina Schaffner and Anita Wenden (Eds.), language and pace, 17-33. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, racism and ideology. RCEI: Ediciones.
Van Dijk, T. A (1997). ‘Discourse as interaction in society’ in Tuen A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction,2, 1-37. London: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). ‘Opinions and ideologies in the press’ in Allan Bell and Peter Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse, 21-63. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Djik, T. A. (2006). ‘Ideology and Discourse Analysis’ in Journal of Political Ideologies,11(2), 115-140. Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context. A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Cambridge & New York : Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Study of Doctor patient Interaction. The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.