The Role of Metadiscourse Markers in Comprehending Texts of Reading Comprehension Books Published in Iran and Oxford University Press

Seyed Jamal Ebrahimi

Abstract


Coherence is considered as the distinctive feature for a text which is achieved by fulfilling two components including texture as the more important one. Structural and non-structural are the two aspects of texture. The earlier deals with inter-sentence or intra-sentence structures including metadiscourse markers. These markers were investigated in this research. A corpus of reading comprehension texts has been compiled from books Published in Iran for university students and compared with similar books printed in Oxford University press. Following investigating each of the lessons in the corpus and contrasting the results, it was found that the texts in Oxford University press used 50 percent more interactive resources and twice more interactional resources. This led to conclude that the texts in Oxford University Press books seem to be more reader-friendly than those in books Published in Iran. Based on the results of this research, Iranian EAP (English for Academic purposes) books developers are recommended to include more interactive metadiscourse markers and much more interactionals to provide students-friendlier books.

Coherence is considered as the distinctive feature for a text which is achieved by fulfilling two components including texture as the more important one. Structural and non-structural are the two aspects of texture. The earlier deals with inter-sentence or intra-sentence structures including metadiscourse markers. These markers were investigated in this research. A corpus of reading comprehension texts has been compiled from books Published in Iran for university students and compared with similar books printed in Oxford University press. Following investigating each of the lessons in the corpus and contrasting the results, it was found that the texts in Oxford University press used 50 percent more interactive resources and twice more interactional resources. This led to conclude that the texts in Oxford University Press books seem to be more reader-friendly than those in books Published in Iran. Based on the results of this research, Iranian EAP (English for Academic purposes) books developers are recommended to include more interactive metadiscourse markers and much more interactionals to provide students-friendlier books.


Keywords


metadiscourse markers, reading texts and EAP

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilar, M. (2008). Metadiscourse in academic speech: a relevance-theoretic approach (Vol. 317): Peter Lang Pub Inc.

Beauvais, P. J. (1986). Metadiscourse in Context: A Speech Act Model of Illocutionary Content.

Crismore, A. (1982). The Metadiscourse Component: Understanding Writing about Reading Directives.

Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse.

Crismore, A, Markannen, R, Steffensen, M, (1993). Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing. A study of texts written by American and Finnish University students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39–71.

Dahl, T, (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807–1825.

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk: Univ of Pennsylvania Pr.

Harris, Z. S. (1959). Computable syntactic analysis. Transformations and Discourse Analysis Project (TDAP), 15.

Halliday, M. K, and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic (p. 136). Arnold: London.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing: Continuum Intl Pub Group.

Marandi, S. (2003). Metadiscourse in Persian/English master's theses: A contrastive study.

Myers, G, (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35.

Pérez-Llantada, C. (2003). Communication skills in academic monologue discourse. Empirical and applied perspectives. Circulo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, (15), Not-availabe.

Salager-Meyer, F, (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse.English for Specific Purposes 13 (2), 149–17

Zarei, G. R., & Mansoori, S. (2007). Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive analysis of English and Persian research articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 3(2), 24-40.

Vande Kopple, W, (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82–93

Williams, Joseph M., (1981). Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Harper Collins Publisher




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.90

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.