Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Scope of Cooperative Learning (CL) Strategies in Teaching English to Saudi Adult EFL Learners: A Study of Practical Barriers and Possible Implications
Abstract
This study aims at investigating the teachers’ practices and perceptions in teaching English in Saudi Arabia by viewing their stance on Cooperative Learning (CL) — an innovative teaching approach proposed to raise the language proficiency level of adult EFL learners. The study has been conducted in Qassim University, Saudi Arabia—a vibrant and flourishing EFL context. A quantitative tool (a questionnaire) has been used to collect data and to serve qualitative purposes. It reports 80 EFL teachers’ (40 males and 40 females) perceptions about CL using a 17-items comprehensive survey covering all the possible barriers in the way of implementing CL strategies in EFL classes. The survey items also explore how the EFL teachers in Saudi Arabia foresee the implications of making such an innovative move in their classes. The responses have been analyzed on a 5-point Likert scale which ranges from strongly disagree-disagree-neutral-agree-strongly agree. Major findings are that CL strategies have practical barriers but their implications are far more positive. The barriers are mainly due to the wrong learning habits of the adult EFL learners in Qassim University and lack of will and vision of the educational administration. The study recommends that CL strategies need to be given due consideration and support by the administrators and policy makers to raise the proficiency level of adult EFL learners. The study also allays the misconception that majority of the practitioners in English language teaching field are not ready to practice and implement CL strategies in their classes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdel Rauf, A. (2010). Grammar-translation method: Still alive in Arab TEFL classroom. TESOL Arabia Perspectives, 17 (1), 13-18.
Alijanian, E. (2012). The effect of student teams achievement division technique on English achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(9), 1971-1975.
Assalahi, H.M. (2013). Why is the Grammar-translation Method Still Alive in the Arab World? Teachers’ beliefs and its implications for EFL teacher education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3(4): 589-599.
Chianson, M.M., Kurameh, M.S., & Obida, J.A. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning strategy on students’ retention in circle geometry in secondary schools in Benue State, Nigeria. American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 2(1), 33-36.
Davoudi, A.H. M. & Mahinpo, B. (2012). Kagan cooperative learning model: The bridge to foreign language learning in the third millennium. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2(6): 1134-1140.
Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 933-940.
Haydon, T., Maheady, L., and Hunter, W. (2010). Effects of numbered heads together on the daily quiz scores and on-task behavior of students with disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education. 19(3): 222-238.
Heath, T.J. (2010). The Impact of a Cooperative Learning Training Program on Teacher Perceptions about Cooperative Learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Ishtiaq, M., Ali, Z., & Salem, M. (2015). The effects of student teams achievement division (STAD) on motivation of Saudi EFL adult learners. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 3, 11-24.
Javid, C. Z., Farooq, U., & Gulzar, M. A. (2012). Saudi English-major undergraduates and English teachers' perceptions regarding effective ELT in the KSA: A comparative study. European Journal of Scientific Research, 85(1), 55-70.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher 38(5): 365-379.
Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (2009). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.
Khan, S.A., Javaid, M.A. & Farooq, U. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of cooperative learning method versus traditional learning method on the writing ability of the students. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 4 (1), 23-32.
Khan, G.N. & Inamullah, H.M. (2011). Effect of student’s team achievement division (STAD) on academic achievement of students. Asian Social Science, 7(12), 211-215.
Kohn, A. (1992). Resistance to cooperative learning: making sense of its deletion and dilution. Journal of Education, 174, 38-55.
Law, Y. K. (2011). The effects of cooperative learning on enhancing Hong Kong fifth graders' achievement goals, autonomous motivation and reading proficiency. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 402-425.
Maherzi, S. (2011). Perceptions of classroom climate and motivation to study English in Saudi Arabia: Developing a questionnaire to measure perceptions and motivation. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 9(2): 765-798.
Mahmoud, M.M.A. (2014). The effectiveness of using the cooperative language learning approach to enhance EFL writing skills among Saudi university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 616-625.
Mohseny, A. & Jamour, F. (2012). The impact of student team achievement division on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL pre-intermediate learners. International Electronic Journal for the Teachers of English, 2(6), 105-129.
Pan, C.Y. & Wu, H.Y. (2013). The cooperative learning effects on English reading comprehension and learning motivation of EFL freshmen. English Language Teaching, 6(5), 13-27.
Slavin, R. E. (2010). Co-operative learning: What makes group work work? In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. (pp. 161-178). Paris, France: OECD.
Slavin, R.E., (2011), Instruction based on cooperative learning. In Mayer, R.E. and Alexander, P.A., (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 344-360), New York: Routledge.
Slavin, R.E. (2009). Cooperative learning. In G. McCulloch & D. Crook (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education. Abington, UK: Routledge.
Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stokes, P. & Wall, T. (2014). Research Methods. London: Palgrave
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2012). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research. 17: 31-48.
Tran, V.D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education 3 (2): p-131.
Van Wyk, M.M. (2010). Do student teams’ achievement divisions enhance economic literacy? A quasi experimental design. Journal of Social Science, 23(2): 83-89.
Van Wyk, M.M. (2012). The effects of the STAD-cooperative learning method on student achievement, attitude and motivation in economics education. Journal of Social Science, 33(2), 261-270.
Wallestad, C. K. (2010). Prospective TESOL teachers' beliefs, understandings, and experiences of cooperative learning. State University of New York at Buffalo.
Wang, T.P. (2009). Applying Slavin’s cooperative learning techniques to a college EFL conversation class. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning 5(1): 112-120.
Wang, M. (2012). Effects of cooperative learning on achievement motivation of female university students. Asian Social Science, 8(15), 108-114.
Zain, Z. M., Subramaniam, G., Rashid, A. A., & Ghani, E. K. (2009). Teaching economics using cooperative learning approach: Accounting students’ performance and attitude. Canadian Social Science, 5(6), 92-102.
Zhou, H. (2012). Enhancing non-English majors’ EFL motivation through cooperative learning. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12, 1317-1323.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.110
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.