The Metalinguistic and Linguistic Knowledge Tests and Their Relationship between Non-native In-service and Pre-service Teachers
Abstract
Fairly recently, the construct of metalinguistic knowledge and its relation to L2 learners’ language proficiency have been the focus of numerous theoreticians, researchers, and the educators in the field. With respect to second language teachers assessment, however, little attempt has been made to explore the metalinguistic knowledge and its relationship between serving and non-serving teachers. The current study, accordingly, was designed to investigate whether there is a relationship between non-native in-service and pre-service teachers performing the metalinguistic and linguistic knowledge tests and if there is a difference between the two groups of teachers’ performance on these two tests. To collect the data on the two constructs of linguistic and metalinguistic knowledge, 80 non-native teachers performed on the Cloze Test and untimed Grammaticality Judgment Test from an English language institute. Following a range of statistical analyses, the findings revealed no positive correlation between the Linguistic and Metalinguistic tests both in the in-service and pre-service teachers of English language. It was also found that the two groups of teachers did not differ significantly with respect to their performance on the Linguistic test while the in-service teachers outperformed their counterpart in the Metalinguistic knowledge test.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications (6th edn). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Berry, R. (2005). “Making the most of metalanguage”, Language Awareness, 14(1), 3-20.
Berry, R. (2009). EFL majors' knowledge of metalinguistic terminology: a comparative study. Language Awareness, 18(2), 113-128.
Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157-168.
Bley-Vroman, R., and Joo, H. R. (2001). The acquisition and interpretation of English locative constructions by native speakers of Korean. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), 207-219.
Butler, Y. (2002) Second language learner’ theories on the use of English articles: An analysis of the metalinguistic knowledge used by Japanese students in acquiring the English article system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451-480.
Correa, M. (2011). Subjunctive accuracy and metalinguistic knowledge of L2 learners of Spanish. Electronic Journal of foreign Language teaching, 8(1), 39-56.
DeKeyser, R. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In: Long, M.H., Doughty, C.J. (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 119-138.
Elder, C. (2009). Validating a test of metalinguistic knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, and H. Reinders, Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. pp. (113-138).
Elder, C. and Manwaring, D. (2004). The relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and learning outcomes among undergraduate students of Chinese’. Language Awareness, 13, 145-162.
Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13 (2), 161-186.
Ellis, R. (2004). “The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge”, Language Learning, 54(2), 227-275.
Gass, S. (1983). The development of L2 intuitions. TESQ Quaterly, 17(2), 273-291.
Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (3), 347-386.
Hu, G. (2010). Revisiting the role of metalanguage in L2 teaching and learning. EA Journal, 26(1), 61-70.
Hu, G. (2011). Metalinguistic knowledge, metalanguage, and their relationship in L2 learners. System, 39, 63-77.
Hulstijn. J. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second language learning: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129-140.
Inagaki, S. (2001). Motion verbs with goal PPs in the L2 acquisition of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(2), 153-170.
Masny, D. (1987). The role of language and cognition in second language metalinguistic awareness. In J.P. Lantolf and A. Labarca (eds). Research in Second Language Learning: Focus on the Classroom (pp. 59-73). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Montrul, S. (2005). On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2. Linguistics, 43 (6), 1153-1190.
Myhill, D. (2000). Misconceptions and difficulties in the acquisition of metalinguistic knowledge. Language and Education, 14 (3), 151-163.
Nabei, T., and Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student’s second language learning. Language Awareness, 11(1), 43-63.
Renou, J. (2001). An examination of the relationship between metalinguistic awareness and second-language proficiency of adult learners of French. Language Awareness, 10, 248-267.
Roehr, K. (2007). Metalinguistic knowledge and language ability in university-level L2 learners. Applied Linguistics, 29, 173-190.
Roehr, K. (2008). Linguistic and metalinguistic categories in second language learning. Cognitive Linguistics, 19 (1), 67–106.
Toth, P. (2006). Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56, 319-385.
White, J., & Ranta, L. (2002). Examining the interface between metalinguistic task performance and oral production in a second language. Language Awareness, 11(4), 259-290.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.6p.246
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.