The Impact of Presenting Semantically Related Clusters of New Words on Iranian Intermediate EFL learners' Vocabulary Acquisition
Abstract
Teaching vocabulary in semantically related sets use as a common practice by EFL teachers. The present study tests the effectiveness of this techniques by comparing it with semantically unrelated clusters as the other technique on Iranian intermediate EFL learners. In the study three intact classes of participants studying at Isfahan were presented with a set of unrelated words through “ 504 Absolutely Essential words”, a set of related words through “The Oxford Picture Dictionary “, and the control group were presented some new words through six texts from “Reading Through Interaction”. Comparing of the results indicated that, while both techniques help the learners to acquire new sets of the words, presenting words in semantically unrelated sets seems to be more effective.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Channell, J. (1981). Applying semantic theory to vocabulary teaching. ELT Journal, 35(2), 115-122.
Channell, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 83-96). London: Longman.
Ediger, M. (1999). Reading and Vocabulary Development, Journal of Instructional Psychology.
Finkbeiner, M., & Nicol, J. (2003). Semantic category effects in second language word learning. The Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 24 (3), 283-369.
Hashemi, R. H., & Gowdasiaei, F. (2005). An attribute-treatment interaction study: Lexical-set versus semantically unrelated vocabulary instruction. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36(3), 341-361.
Hoshino, Y. (2010). The categorical facilitation effects on L2 vocabulary learning in a classroom setting. RELC J, 41, 301-312.
Hunt, R. R., & Worthen, J. B. (2006). Distinctiveness and memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehrer, A. (1974). Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. North-Holland: Amsterdam.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (p. 416-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Meara, P. (1983). Vocabulary in a second language Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128.
Nowbakht, M. (2015). The comparative effects of presenting words in semantically related sets vs. semantically unrelated sets on the receptive acquisition of L2 vocabulary items. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 68-78. ISSN: 2146-1732.
Rabinowitz, J. C., Craik, F. I. M., & Ackerman, B. P. (1982). A processing resource account of age differences in recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 325-344.
Schmidt, S. R. (1985). Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 565–578.
Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? The Journal of Memory and Cognition, 19, 523–542.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt X., M. Mc Carthy (Eds.), vocabulary: description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, C. B. (1997). Vocabulary instruction and reading comprehension. Bloomington, IN, USA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication Skills.
Tinkham, T. (1993). The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. The Journal of System, 21,371-380.
Tinkham, T. (1997). The effects of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. The Journal of Second Language Research, 13(2), 138-163.
Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: a replication. The Journal of System, 25(2), 261-274.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.6p.19
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.