Augmenting Tertiary Students' Soft Skills Via Multiple Intelligences Instructional Approach: Literature Courses in Focus
Abstract
The second half of the twentieth century is a witness to an unprecedentedly soaring increase in the number of students joining the arena of higher education(UNESCO,2001). Currently, the number of students at Saudi universities and colleges exceeds one million vis-à-vis 7000 in 1970(Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia, Washington). Such enormous body of learners in higher education is per se diverse enough to embrace distinct learning styles, assorted repertoire of backgrounds, prior knowledge, experiences, and perspectives; at this juncture, they presumably share common aspiration which is hooking a compatible post in the labor market upon graduation, and to subsequently be capable of acting competently in a scrupulously competitive workplace environment. Bunch of potentialities and skills are patently vital for a graduate to reach such a prospect. Such bunch of skills in a conventional undergraduate paradigm of education were given no heed, being rather postponed to the post-graduation phase. The current Paper postulated tremendous merits of deploying the Multiple Intelligences theory as a project-based approach, within literature classes in higher education; a strategy geared towards reigniting students’ engagement, nurturing their critical thinking capabilities, sustaining their individualistic dispositions, molding them as inquiry-seekers, and ending up engendering life-long, autonomous learners, well-armed with the substantial skills for traversing the rigorous competition in future labor market.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barrington, E. (2004). Teaching to Student diversity in Higher Education: How Multiple Intelligences Theory Can Help. Teaching in Higher Education,9(4),421-434.
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open.
Bishop, J.L. & Verlager, M.A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. http://www.studiesuccesho.nl/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/flipped-classroom-artikel.pdf
Bloom, B., Englehart, M, Furst, E., Hill,W. & Krahtwohl, D(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans Green.
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Campbell, L., Campbell, B.& Dickinson, D.(1996) Teaching and Learning through Multiple Intelligences(Boston, MA, Allyn& Bacon).
Chapman, A.(2009, December 20). Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences. Retrieved January18th,2016, from businessballs.com: http://www.businessballs.com/howardgardnermultipleintelligences.htm.
Critical Thinking and Literature-Based Reading(1997). Report. Madison, WI: The Institute for Academic Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED421688&ERICExtSear ch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED421688
Dunn, R., Griggs, S. A., Olson, J., Gorman, B., & Beasley, M. (1995). A meta analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model. Journal of Educational Research, 88(6), 353-361.
Dunn R, Dunn K(1993). Teaching Secondary Students through Their Individual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches for Grades 7–12. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160-166.
Elsherief, E. (2016). Forth to the Past: Digitizing Literature Classes. In Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2016 (pp. 1172-1176). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Felder, R. M., &Brent, R.(2005). Understanding Student Differences. Journal of Engineering Education,94(1).
Gardner, H.(1983). Frames of Mind: the Theory of Multiple Intelligences(New York, Basic books).
Gardner, H.(1993). Multiple Intelligences, the Theory and Practice(USA, Harper Collins).
Gitsaki, C., Robby, M.A., Priest, T., Hamdan, K., & Ben-Chabane, T. (2013). A research agenda for the UAE iPad initiative. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives 10(2), 1-15.
Lazere, D(1987). “Critical Thinking in College English Studies,” ERIC Digest. ED 284275. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/con tentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED284275
Lazerson, M., Wagner, U. & Shumanis, N. (2000). What makes a revolution? Teaching and learning in higher education, 1980-2000. Change, 32(3), 13-19.
Oermann, M. H. (2004). Using active learning in lecture: Best of “both worlds.” Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 1(1), 1-11. Available at http://www.bepress.com/ijnes/vol1/iss1/art1
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities(Chicago, IL, Chicago University Press).
Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS Press.
Topping, Keith J. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology,25(6),pp.631-645.
UNESCO (2001)Report on World Conference on Higher Education. Available online at: http://www.unesco.org/education/wche/index.shtml (accessed 26 February 2004).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.2p.230
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.