The Readability of Malaysian English Children Books: A Multilevel Analysis

Adlina Ismail, Normah Yusof, Kamariah Yunus

Abstract


These days, there are more English books for children published by local publishers in Malaysia. It is a positive development because the books will be more accessible to the children. However, the books have never been studied and evaluated in depth yet. One important factor in assessing reading materials is readability. Readability determines whether a text is easy or difficult to understand and a balanced mix of both can promote learning and language development. Various researchers mentioned a multilevel framework of discourse that any language assessment on a text should take into account. The levels that were proposed were word, syntax, textbase, situation model and genre and rhetorical structures. Traditional readability measures such as Flesh Reading Ease Formula, Gunning Readability Index, Fog Count, and Fry Grade Level are not able to address the multilevel because they are based on shallow variables. In contrast, Coh-metrix TERA provided five indices that are correlated to grade level and aligned to the multilevel framework. This study analyzed ten Malaysian English chapter books for children using this Coh-metrix TERA. The result revealed that the Malaysian English children books were easy in shallow level but there was a possible difficulty in textbase and situation model level because of the lack of cohesion. In conclusion, more attention should be given on deeper level of text rather than just word and syntax level.

 


Keywords


Readability, assessment of reading materials, children books, Coh-Metrix

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayob, S. (1981). Sastera untuk kanak-kanak: Fungsi dan implikasinya. Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 73-82.

Carrell, P.L. (1987). Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4(1), pp.21– 40. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/PastIssues/rfl41carrell.pdf

Caramelli, N., Setti, A., & Maurizzi, D.D. (2004). Concrete and abstract concepts in school age children. Psychology of Language and Communication, 8(2), 19-34.

Chew, F. P., & Ishak Z. (2010). Malaysian folk literature in early childhood education. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, pp.557-564. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050913012209

Crossley, S. A., Allen, D. B., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text readability and intuitive simplification: A comparison of readability formulas. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 84 -101. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 21 (2/3), 170-191. Retrieved from http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwesl/Scott_Publications.html

DuBay, W. H. 2004. The Principles of Readability. Retrieved from http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf.

Shamsuddin, F. (2003). Masalah penerbitan buku kanak-kanak. Kertas Kerja Seminar Terbitan Sastera Kanak-Kanak (pp.22-23). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Grabe, W. (2014). Key Issues in L2 Reading Development. In CELC Symposium Bridging Research and Pedagogy (pp.8-18). Retrieved from http://www.nus.edu.sg/celc/research /symposiumproceedings.php

Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 371–398. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x/full

Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing Multilevel analysis of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223 – 234. Retrieved from http://er.aera.net

Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Cai, Z., Conley, M., Li, H., & Pennebaker, J. (2014).Coh-Metrix measures text characteristics at multiple levels of language and discourse. The Elementary School Journal, 15(2), 210-229.

Hamid, R., & Hassan, S. (2012). Penerapan sastera dalam pengajaran bahasa di sekolah rendah. In Seminar Bahasa Melayu 2012: Kecekapan Berbahasa dan Penghayatan Nilai dalam Pendidikan Abad Ke-21 (pp. 226-234). Singapore: MLCS. Retrieved from https://malaylanguagecentre.moe.edu.sg/images/pdf/16-penerapan-sastera-dalam-pengajaran-bahasa-di-sekolah-rendah-rosnita-sarifah.pdf

Heilman, M. J., Collins-Thompson, K., Callan, J., & Eskenazi, M. (2007). Combining lexical and grammatical features to improve readability measures for first and second language texts. In Proceedings of NAACL HLT (pp. 460 – 467). Rochester, NY: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Hill, D. R. (2008). Graded readers in English. ELT Journal, 62(2), 184 – 204. Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org

Hsieh, M., Wang, F., & Lee, S. (2011). A corpus-based analysis comparing vocabulary input from storybooks and textbooks. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 25-33.

Ismail, A., & Yusof, N. (2016). Readability of ESL picture books in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 1(1), 60-70.

Malu, K. F. (2013). Exploring children's picture storybooks with adult and adolescent EFL learners. English Teaching Forum, 3, 10-18.

McCarthy, P. M., Lewis, G. A., Dufty, D. F., & McNamara, D. S. (2006). Analyzing writing styles with Coh-Metrix. In G. C. J. Sutcliffe & R. G. Goebel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th annual Florida artificial intelligence research society international conference (pp.764-770). Retrieved from http://aaaipress.org/Papers/FLAIRS/2006/Flairs06-151.pdf

McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., & Graesser, A. (2002). Coh-Metrix: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension. Grant proposal. Retrieved from http://cohmetrix.memphis.edu/cohmetrixpr/publications.html

McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27 (1), 57 – 86. doi: 10.1177/0741088309351547. Retrieved from http://wcx.sagepub.com.

McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., Cai, Z., & Kulikowich (2011). Coh-Metrix easability components: Aligning text difficulty with theories of text comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

McNamara, D. S., & Graesser, A. C. (2012). Coh-Metrix: An automated tool for theoreticaland applied natural language processing. In P. M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (Eds.), Applied Natural Language Processing and Content Analysis: Identification, Investigation, and Resolution (pp. 188–205). Hershey, PA: IGI Global

McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., & Louwerse, M. M. (2012). Sources of text difficulty:Across genres and grades. In J. P. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring Up: Advances in How We Assess Reading Ability (pp. 89–116). Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A., Cai, Z., & Dai, J. (2013). Coh-Metrix Common Core T.E.R.A. version 1.0. Retrieved from http//:coh-metrix.commoncoretera.com.

McNamara, D.S., Graesser, A.C., McCarthy, P. M. & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mohamed Isa, Z. (2009). Choosing appropriate Bahasa Melayu books for Malaysian children. Jurnal Bitara, 2, 45 – 57.

Latiff Azmi, M. N. (2013). National language policy and its impact on second language reading culture. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 3(1), pp.1-11. http://www.jielusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Azmi-Final.pdf

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Retrieved from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=hLGmKkh_4K8C

Rafi, M. S. (2013). Natural order of vocabulary acquisition. European Academic Research, 1(5), 721-733. Retrieved from http://euacademic.org/UploadArticle/52.pdf

Schwanenflugel, P. J. & Knapp, N. F. (2015). The Psychology of Reading: Theory and Applications. Guilford Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?isbn= 1462523501

Shilfhout, G. (2014). Fun to read or easy to understand? Establishing effective text features for educational texts on the basis of processing and comprehension research. Retrieved from dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/300805/silfhout.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.6p.214

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.