Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Malaysian Tertiary Level ESL Students’ Perceptions toward Teacher Feedback, Peer Feedback and Self-assessment in their Writing
Abstract
In Malaysia, teacher feedback is highly preferred by students, who often believe that teachers know best. Teacher feedback shows them their teacher’s idea of an ideal writing. However, excessive dependence on teachers adds to their workload. Therefore, teachers are increasingly promoting two other alternative methods that are gradually gaining importance. These methods are peer feedback and self-assessment. This study investigates ESL students’ perceptions toward teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-assessment in students’ writing process. Questionnaires, adapted from the instruments in the literature, were administered to 107 randomly selected students in a private local university in Malaysia. Students found feedback given to the content and organization of their writing more useful than feedback provided for their vocabulary and grammar. It was also found that students perceived feedback from teacher, peers and self-assessment all as highly useful. Additionally the results indicated while there was no significant difference (p > .05) between the students’ perceptions toward teacher feedback and self-assessment, they were both perceived as significantly more useful (p < .001) than peer feedback. The students also perceived explicit feedback as significantly more useful (p < .001) than implicit feedback. The results of this study have implications for English language learning-teaching practitioners and researchers. They shed light on the options preferred by students in revising their writing in ESL writing classrooms. Future research on the effects of teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-assessment on students’ writing performance will provide better insight on the preferred methods in ESL writing classrooms in similar settings.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement through Self-Assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.
Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written Corrective Feedback: What do Students and Teachers Think is Right and Why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquee, 13(2), 95-127.
Belachew, M., Getinet, M., & Gashaye, A. (2015). Perception and practice of self-assessment in EFL writing classrooms, Journal of Languages and Culture, 6(1), 1–8.
Brown, A. V. (2009). Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46-60.
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93-121.
Dragemark-Oscarson, A. (2009). Self-assessment of writing in learning English as a foreign language. A study at the upper secondary school level. (PhD Dissertation). Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 277. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. University of Gothenburg/Sweden.
Elashri, I. I. E. A. F. (2013). The Impact of the Direct Teacher Feedback Strategy on the EFL Secondary Stage Students' Writing Performance. Online Submission.
Faizah Abd Majid. (2007). Self-regulated learning: Effective practices in ESL writing classes. Journal of LanguageStudies, 3, 115–128. Retrieved from http://education.uitm.edu.my/v1/images/stories/publication/faizah/article9.pdf
Felix, S. W. (1985). More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research, 1(1), 47-72.
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33-53.
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184.
Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime ...?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62.
Gulley, B. (2012). Feedback on Developmental Writing Students' First Drafts. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 16.
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53–70.
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of second language writing, 3(2), 141-163.
Hedgcock, J., & Letkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 287- 308.
Holec, H. (1981) Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning, Oxford: Pergamon (first published Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 1979).
Honsa, Jr, S. (2013). Self-assessment in EFL Writing: A Study of Intermediate EFL Students at a Thai University. Voice in Asia Journal, 1(1), 34–57.
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255-286.
Jacobs, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S.-Y. (1998). Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 307–317.
Kohonen, V. (2012). Developing autonomy through ELP-oriented pedagogy: Exploring the interplay of shallow and deep structures in a major change within language education. In B. Kühn & M. L. P. Cavana (Eds.), Perspectives from the European Language Portfolio (pp. 22-42). London: Routledge.
Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 45-77.
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144–164.
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.
Lightbown, P. (1992). Getting quality input in the second/foreign language classroom. Text and context: Crossdisciplinary perspectives on language study, 198-197.
Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching, 10(2), 88–103.
Little, D. (2012). The European Language Portfolio: History, key concerns, future prospects. In B. Kühn & M. L. P. Cavana (Eds.), Perspectives from the European Language Portfolio (pp. 7-21). London: Routledge.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, 2(1), 39-52.
Mahmoodi, M. H., Kalantari, B., & Ghaslani, R. (2014). Self-Regulated Learning ( SRL ), Motivation and Language Achievement of Iranian EFL Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1062–1068. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.517
Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75-100.
Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). Effect of peer review and tutor conferencing on English as a second language learners’ writing performance. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (JSSH), 19(1), 25-38.
Moritz, C. (1996). Student self-assessment of language proficiency: Perceptions on self and others, Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied, Chicago, IL.
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113–131.
Nielsen, K. (2014). Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: A conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(00), 1–16.
Park, E. (2006). Review M c l e on “The Effectiveness of Teacher’s Written Feedback on L2 Writing.”
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289.
Peng, J. (2010). Peer assessment in an EFL context: Attitudes and Correlations. In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum, ed. Matthew T. Prior et al (pp. 89-107).
Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16(3), 355-365.
Razali, R., & Jupri, R. (2014). Exploring Teacher Written Feedback and Student Revisions on ESL Students’ Writing, IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 19(5), 63–70.
Ross, J. A, Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998). Skills training versus action research in-service: Impact on student attitudes to self-evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(5), 463–477.
Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-70.
Salih, A. R. A. (2013). Peer Response to L2 Student Writing: Patterns and Expectations. English Language Teaching, 6(3), p42.
Schachter, J. (1988). Second language acquisition and its relationship to Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 219-235.
Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA‐Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258.
Singh, K., & Terry, J. (2008). Fostering students’ self-assessment skills for sustainable learning. Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2008 International Conference, (November), 19–21.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Truscott, J., & Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(June), 327–369.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MA: Harvard university press.
Williams, E. (1992). Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment. Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 17(1), 45-58.
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 186-193.
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of second language writing, 15(3), 179-200.
Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of second language writing, 4(3), 209-222.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.158
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.