The Planning Policy of Bilingualism in Education in Iraq
Abstract
Iraq as a multicultural and multilingual country has different languages as Arabic, which is the dominant language, and it also has some other minority languages, such as Kurdish, Turkish, Syriac....etc. Over the last 80 years, Iraq which was involved in some political struggles, had faced many internal problems regarding the Arabic domination that occurred, and this was owing to the absence of clear language policy used. Children learning in the Iraqi system, for instance, speak and study all courses in Arabic, while speaking and using their own culture at home tend to be done in their first language. The minorities’ language usage in Iraq was ignored both inside the schools as well as in the curriculum construction. So this study focuses on the following issues: the first issue is, What is the strategy of language planning policy in Iraq? the study discusses the strategy and the planning educational system that Iraq applies now, the second issue is, What is the status of minority languages in Iraq? Iraq is a multicultural county and has many minorities communities with different languages, the third issue is, What are the challenges of language in Iraq? as long as there is different languages within one country the study also focuses on the challenges that been faced in the planning policy system, and the last issue is, Is there a homogenous relationship during the current policy? How? the study shows the homogenous relationship inside the current policy and the researches give many suggestions and recommendations regarding to the current policy and what is needed for improving the educational planning policy system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al‐Hirmizi, A. (2003). The Turkmen and Iraqi Home land. Kirkuk: KERKUKVAKFI. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Turkmen
Center, E. H. (2001). Linguistic Diversity and Early Literacy: Serving Culturally Diverse Families in Early Head Start. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Roth, F. P., Speece, D. L., & Cooper, D. H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 259-272.
Curran, M. E. (2003). Linguistic Diversity and Classroom Management. Ohio: College of Education.
Garcia, D. (2009). Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective.
Giles, R. (1977). Perceived benefit model of language shift.
Harmers, J. F., & Blanc M. H. A. (2004). Bilinguality and bilingualism (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joshua Fishman, 1968. Language planning and language planning research: the state of the art.
Kerkuklu, M. S., & Beyath, K. (2008). The Turkmen City of Tuz Khormatu. Iraqi Turks Society for Culture and Solidarity.
Mackey, W. (2000). The description of bilingualism. In L.Weir (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (pp. 22-50). New York: Routledge.
Macnamara, J. (1967). The bilingual’s linguistic performance. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 58- 77.
Weir, L. (2000).Dimensions of bilingualism.InL. Wei (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (pp. 22-50).New York: Routledge.
Willems, G. M. (2002). Language Teacher Education Policy promoting Linguistic Diversity and Intercultural Communication. Strasbourg: DGIV.
Xing, H. (2003). Minority language planning of China in relation to use and development. Khadar, H. S. (2007).The legal status of Kurdish language in Iraq. Niqash: briefings from inside and across Iraq. Retrieved from http://www.niqash.org/articles/?id=2057
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.3p.1
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature
To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.