The Validity of Grammaticality Judgment Task on Saudi EFL Learners

Sami Alanazi

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the validity of the controversial data-gathering tool Grammaticality Judgment Task on measuring the grammatical competency of Saudi EFL learners. Despite the widespread use of GJT in SLA research, it is surrounded by a great deal of criticism. The present paper is part of a larger study investigating the acquisition of past verb forms by Saudi EFL learners. Thirty-six Saudi EFL learners took part in the study and were divided into three groups as follows: guided-planning group, semi-guided planning group, and control group. The task used in the study consisted of twenty test items: 10 control test items, and 10 experimental test items. The results did not reveal significant statistical differences between the three groups. Also, the results did not reflect the actual grammatical competency of the participants.

 


Keywords


Grammaticality Judgment Task, GJT; Second Language Acquisition, SLA; Linguistics; Saudi Learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic accept- ability. Language, 72, 32–68.

Bialystok, E. (1979). Explicit and implicit judgments of L2 grammaticality. Language Learning, 29, 81–103.

Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Bullock, G., Omaki, A., Schulz, B., Schwartz, B. D., & Tremblay, A. (2005). Did they say in Interlanguage that CP is missing, or did they say that in Interlanguage CP is missing? Paper presented at the 8th Bi-Annual Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition Conference, Università degli Studi di Siena, September 9.

Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33(3), 343–377.

Cowan, R., & Hatasa, Y. A. (1994). Investigating The Validity and Reliability of Native Speaker and Second-Language Learner Judgments about Sentences. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Research Methodologies in Second-Language Acquisition (pp. 287-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Davies, W., and T. Kaplan. (1998). Native Speaker vs. L2 Learner Grammaticality Judgments. Applied Linguistics 19, 183-203.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.

Ellis, R. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2).

Ellis, R. (2004). The Definition and Measurement of L2 Explicit Knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227–275.

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring Implicit and Explicit Knowledge of A Second Languages: A Psychometric Study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27.

Gass, S. (1983). The development of L2 intuitions. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 273–291.

Goss, N., Ying-Hua, Z., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Two heads may be better than one: Mental activity in second-language grammaticality judgments. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 263–286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Loewen, S. (2009). Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 94–112). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Mandell, P. (1999). On the reliability of grammaticality judgment tests in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 15, 73–99.

Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistics methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago

Tremblay, A. (2005). On the use of grammaticality judgments in linguistic theory: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Second Language Studies, 24, 129-167.

Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375–409). San Diego, CA: Academic.

White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.6p.78

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2023 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD. 

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.